Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting game..., 7 Aug. 2010
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Dark Fall: Lights Out - The Director's Cut Edition (PC DVD) (DVD-ROM)
Last time I played a game like this was about 15 years ago.

I was in the mood for something where one has to use the mind more than brawn (i`m usually into violent shooters\strategy games) and decided to try this.

I was in for a bit of a shock when, in 1st person the screen simply slide-showed to the next bit of street or wall or whatever. A shock when used to smooth 1st person games where walking down a street is nothing for games these days to do. Strange how the maker of this game decided to go decade-retro.

However, it kinda works since you do end up focusing on the puzzle to solve rather than eye candy - and the graphics are not that bad, there is some moving animatiom such as fog and light glow. My main gripes with games like these is because of their nature they barely show people. I can understand in a spooky lighthouse, but before that there`s a small village port with people and a pub, but you only see one barely animate drunk stuck to a wall. You hear people laughing in the pub, but of course you can`t enter.

And that`s another thing that mars games like these somewhat, the invisble forcefield barrier or objects that don`t work until they feel like it. I don`t like not being able to go up a stairs just because it`s a bit dark or being stopped going up a stairs because there maybesomething spooky there. The lantern\torch you get is also illogical; there are many dark places in the game, but the lantern shines only where it wants to if it helps the plot along. Don`t like. This kind of thing makes it hard to plod along logically thinking out the puzzles when illogical things like this happen.

However...having pretended this is normal, I am finding it quite an absorbing game. Nice sound effects and graphics. Good, intellectual story with the odd surprise to discover. There`s definitely some kind of love and depth put into this game and I suspect that the faults I mentioned earlier are down to limitations of personell than ambition.

Good game if you want to retro-game and help train those brain muscles more than mindlessly playing the standard RTS.

Well, finally got to the end of the game after a month. Hardwork. There was one bit where I could not understand the riddle at all and I`m ashamed to say I had to look up a cheat for it after wrestling with it for days. I STILL didn`t understand the logic of the puzzle afterwards which is most irritating. Still if the answer had been really easy I would`ve felt even more annoyed for cheating on that bit. Also, certain places where there should be life were conspicuously absent for no logical reason (basic game-engine limit no doubt). Interesting plot while highly unlikely reason why the lighthouse was the way it was. It certainly won`t be what you expect. I was also curious (midway in the game- without giving away spoilers) about the light house and decided to check it up. This place actually EXISTS! It`s real. I must visit it sometime.

I would only advise playing this if you like a bit of mental torture and are very, very stubborn to finish once you start, like me!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 19 Oct 2010 13:08:29 BDT
Kattia says:
I don't know why you call it a "retro" game? This game comes under the category of pc Adventure game, some new and some old.
I could say the same about your interest in the "violent shooters/strategy" games. They have been going on for a very long time - does it make them "retro"? These Adventure games are a certain style of games and a great pleasure to play - without shooting and moving people like a chess game which come under another category..

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Oct 2010 13:24:42 BDT
Last edited by the author on 19 Oct 2010 13:38:05 BDT
Seafireliv says:
Why the aggressive tone?

I call it Retro because it plays much like the early games of the 1990s that were available before the more 3D games came in. I feel like i`ve gone back 20 years when playing it. I explained this, so why do you choose to ignore what I wrote in my review? Are your abilties to read a review and sum up inadequate? Or do you like to take just one sentence out of context of the entire review?

For your sake, a brief explanation:
You could call my interest in "violent shooters/strategy" `retro`, but only if they are games like the original doom, Civilization original, counterstrike, Baldur`s gate etc, etc that were around in those days, they are defintely retro- Still good games, mind you. The modern ones of today such as Doom3, Farcry2, Fallout 3, Oblivion, Civ4/5 are not as they are quite recent.

Understand what I mean?

Your written words seem angry, aggresive because I call it `Retro`. Why? Bad hair day? I see no reason for it. Calling something Retro is not always a bad thing as you seem to think it is.

Less of the attitude. Thankyou.

In reply to an earlier post on 2 Nov 2010 19:17:10 GMT
dave00dance says:
i agree uncalled for aggressive tone above, in responce to why the game is slide show form i think it is because some adventuure games studios dont really have the funds to make a fully 3d enviroment in first person also things in 3d never look half as good as fine art back drops, example how crap broken sword 3 looked or gabrial knight 3 when they shifted to 3d engines everything in first person would look strange and flat

In reply to an earlier post on 2 Nov 2010 19:31:51 GMT
Seafireliv says:
Thankyou. A considered logical approach. I agree.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details