Shop now Shop now Shop now Up to 70% off Fashion Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Amazon Fire TV Subscribe and Save Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Overturns important myths about the causes of WW1, 8 Aug. 2011
This review is from: Inventing the Schlieffen Plan: German War Planning 1871-1914 (Hardcover)
When I was at school I studied Medieval History with enjoyment because of the shortage of facts-this required the historian to fill in the gaps to a greater extent than with modern history. However, the military historian of the First World War is in some ways in the same position. The destruction of much of the German archive in bombing raids during of the Second World War means that whilst there is voluminous data from the Entente side, evidence on such crucial things as German casualty rates and war plans is limited. The historian has to fill in the gaps.

I remember first reading about `The Schlieffen plan' as a schoolboy (I think it was in a `Look and Learn' potted history of the War), and it was certainly portrayed as being the font of German militarism. Zuber claims that this plan was invented by the German General Staff in the 1920s to enable the blame for the failure to win the Battle of the Marne to be laid at the door of 3 conveniently dead officers: Moltke, Bulow and Hensch. In the 1950s the German historian Ritter found a manuscript written by Schlieffen describing what purported to be the German plan used in 1914 and used it a key part of his description of German militarism. According to Zuber, Ritter defined militarism as the one sided determination of national policy according to military calculations, rather than raison d'etat or rule of law, morality etc. National policy in 1914 was determined solely by technical considerations of mobilisation. Ritter initially wrote that this was true of all the European states, not just Germany, but later narrowed to being mainly a German issue. The Schlieffen plan dictated invasion of Belgium once mobilisation commenced.

Because the traditional view of the Schlieffen plan is so entrenched it requires an effort of will to think oneself into what Zuber is saying, but much of his argument is convincing. In particular, his argument that there was not a pre-conceived plan to march through Belgium and wheel round Paris in some vast plan of encirclement does appear valid, and Schlieffen's 1905 manuscript does not support the weight placed on it.

His wider arguments that the case for German militarism and war-guilt is weakened if not demolished are not so convincing, although he does make some valid points. In particular:-

1. The Russians mobilised first, and the conference held by the Russians & French was crucial to the road to war because the Russians committed to attack before fully mobilised (by the 16th day). This inclined them towards mobilising early to minimize their state of unpreparedness.
2. The Germans were aware of these aggressive war plans, and also the size and increasing preparedness of the Russian `steamroller'. It was unreasonable not to expect plans to be drawn up to counter this.

However, Zuber overstates his case, and in particular the following points are unconvincing:-

1. The attack on Liege is excused by the need to protect the German flank because, if Britain joined the war, which was likely `the Germans had to assume the Belgians would then side with the entente regardless'. This is a huge assumption and no evidence is presented for this.

2. Zuber argues that the French would have invaded Belgium anyway, the Germans just got there first. His only evidence for this is appears to be that the French plans required 3 armies to deploy near the Belgian border. Such a radical argument surely needs much greater weight of evidence than this!

One gets the feeling reading the book that Zuber is determined to rescue the reputation of the pre- WW1 German Army from the common view that it was the parent of Nazism and the atrocities committed by the Wehrmacht as well as the SS in WW2. I don't think he fully succeeds. The recklessness and brutal cynicism of the invasion of Belgium is still there, and Ritter's characterisation of this as `Militarism' still looks right to me. But Zuber did convince me that the conventional view of the Schlieffen Plan needs to be revised.

Despite my misgivings I would say that this is essential reading for anyone who is interested in the history of the 20th Century, not just the origins of the Great War, given that German Militarism is central to the way the Modern World has been created. Even if you ultimately disagree with his broader claims, he does convincingly argue that the truth is more complex that the version of events handed down to us by Liddell Hart, & still widely believed.

The price of this book is obscene, clearly no-one except academics & those with access to a library are expected to read it. This is a shame as anyone interested in the Great War ought to read it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Be the first person to comment on this review.

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in

Review Details



Location: UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 141,856