Customer Review

7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Not much about engineers, 24 July 2013
This review is from: Engineers of Victory: The Problem Solvers who Turned the Tide in the Second World War (Hardcover)
Engineers of Victory would lead most potential readers to expect a book about the contribution that engineers made to the global Allied victory in the Second World War. Well, don't hold your breath. Any number of opportunities to explain, let's say, the engineering behind the Mulberry harbours, the laminar flow wing of the P51 Mustang, or the development of the R-R Merlin 61 are ignored in this book. In the case of the Mustang, the author writes that there was an aeronautical puzzle concerning the Mustang's greater weight but longer range of a Spitfire. Had he asked an engineer, Mr Kennedy would have been told that the designers of the aircraft had spent a long time testing a variety of laminar-flow wings developed by NAA-NACA, the fore-runner of NASA, in the USA, before selecting the one with the best lift to drag ratio. There was absolutely no mystery.

Further, in the second chapter, the author describes the Vickers Vimy as being four-engined, when it had just two, and refers to Elmer Bendiner, a survivor of the Schweinfurt raids, as Elmer Bendiger throughout the book including the bibliography. This may only be serious for Mr Bendiner's lost sales, but I started to wonder as I went through the book how much else might be wrong. I know a fair amount about aircraft, but know little about submarines. What errors might lurk there?

Finally, the book, at 436 pages, is at least a fifth too long, largely because of the repetitious writing style.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 24 Oct 2013 20:37:02 BDT
J. A. Cook says:
With reference to Mr. Greensted's comment: concerning laminar flow wings- the Spitfire also had a laminar flow wing. The Mustang's greater range was due to something known as the Meredith effect. Indeed, consulting an engineer might be appropriate for others!

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Oct 2013 09:01:33 GMT
I never said that the Spitfire did not have a laminar flow wing. Where is it in my review, please?

Posted on 17 Jul 2014 13:50:32 BDT
Brunel says:
Stephen, couldn't agree more. I learned nearly as much from your review as I did from spending nearly £10 on the good Mr Kennedy's book.

Brunel
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: London

Top Reviewer Ranking: 53,538