Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop All Amazon Fashion Up to 70% off Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Shop Amazon Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

3 of 8 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Not quite persuaded with quality, 10 Oct. 2012
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Persuaders!: The Complete Series - [ITV] - [Network] - [Blu-ray] (Blu-ray)
Having read the reviews about how great this was on Blue ray. I desided to buy this set to replace my previous collection,which was also on DVD. And to be honest, i'am a bit disappointed with some of the quality.
Yes loads of great extra's, most of which relate to the series, and one or two with no connection what so ever, A 1974 interview with Tony Curtis on the Russell Harty show for example, but ok and of some interest. But if you are
fan of the series you will be in Persuaders heaven with this set. It will keep you amused for hours as you relive
the year 1970 to 1971. Check out the cars parked in the streets, the clothes and the haircuts. And all those actors that you had forgotten about. Watchout for some of those who had appeared in the Saint, and later would appear in James Bond with Roger Moore.

I do think that the transfer to blue ray is not as good as some people make out.
One of the problems is that it is bit grainy in places and white speckles do appear on some dark areas,check out the beginning of the episode Read and Destroy. And as some other people have already commented on you do see the odd hair appear the lens,see the part were Roger Moore is kissing the girl at the airport in Overture. But for me the biggest disappointment is the 4.3 aspect for all the episodes. Considering the extras are in 16.9.And that even my old collection was in,or showed in 16.9.
In this day of wide, flat screen tv's they could have made the effort.
But maybe there is a technical reason for this that someone could enlighten me on.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 28 Oct 2012 13:18:04 GMT
T. Bartell says:
Few if any series before the 1990's were shot in 16.9 format. Even the reconstruction of Star Trek: The Next Generation had controversy because some people wanted to salvage the picture elements that were outside the original 4.3 broadcast frame. If that had been done it would have resulted in a 15.9 picture but would have required a lot of cgi work to edit out boom mikes, technician's elbows, sawhorses, sets that didn't reach the edge of the frame, the odd pepsi bottle, etc. And that would only have been possible because they had access to all the original film stock which had to be re-edited from scratch. My guess is 10 years from now when cgi is drastically cheaper and 4K discs come out we'll see a 15.9 set of Star Trek so that they can double-dip yet again. If Network only had access to pristine prints of the original broadcast version we're not likely to see anything else, and OMG we're thankful to get that. The only way they could have produced a 16.9 set would be to zoom in and fill the screen by cutting off the top and bottom of the picture. Your player or your tv remote should have a zoom button, so you can do that yourself.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›