28 of 30 people found the following review helpful
A must read,
This review is from: Bad Blood: The Secret Life of the Tour de France (Paperback)
Like many I have watched the Tour de France on television and marvelled at
the super human achievements of the cyclists who put themselves through this hell. What is even more fascinating, however, are the relationships that exist in this world; not just between the riders, but also the journalists, administrators and financiers. Whittle's book gives a rare insight into how it is to live and work in an environment where people lie and deceive on a daily basis, not because they dislike you, but because
their very survival in this world appears to depend on it.
Other reviews have said that there is nothing new in this book regarding the material facts of the numerous doping scandals. This misses, what I see, as the point of the book. Whittle gives the reader a glimpse of the relationships that exist within elite sport. His relationships with David Millar and Lance Armstrong typify how difficult it has been for Whittle to stay in love with a sport that once gave him so much as a fan, but as part of the professional cycling circus, he struggles to find truth and honour, not least within himself.
I don't believe, as one reviewer states, that Whittle sets out to tie
Armstrong to doping. Armstrong has a place within cycling that is without
precedent, and so you can sense Whittle's growing sense of anger that Armstrong failed to use the power his position afforded him to banish doping from the peloton. Armstrong like everyone else featured in
this book is,neither a hero or villain, but a human being who has fought
to survive in such a hostile environment, something a figure like Marco
Pantani was unable to do.
This is a compelling and often disturbing account of the paradox of loving a
sport, whilst at the same time seeing the lure of success in it challenge
and, in some cases, destroy, relationships and individuals.
A must read.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 19 Aug 2009 09:05:21 BDT
"I don't believe, as one reviewer states, that Whittle sets out to tie
Armstrong to doping."
I can't believe that you wrote that. The whole book is dripping with innuendo. But the simple fact is that Lance is tested so frequently that he couldn't possibly be doping.
In reply to an earlier post on 16 Oct 2012 12:00:09 BDT
Last edited by the author on 16 Oct 2012 12:00:39 BDT
Robert Davies says:
"But the simple fact is that Lance is tested so frequently that he couldn't possibly be doping"
I guess that unless you're one of the 'Armstrong can do no wrong' brigade, then you probably want to rethink that last sentence...
‹ Previous 1 Next ›