Do not believe this review, if you can call it that. As crime thrillers go these two are amongst the best films of the 70s. Very well acted, directed and photographed.
MrViewer has a habit of trashing classic films, in two or three lines. These normally contain insubstantial statements like "I liked the scenery".
This is one no better:
Line 1 - "If I liked G. Hackman.."
In what way don't you like G. Hackman and why?
Please justify the statement. Why do you dislike one of the best actors of the 70s and 80s?
Line 2 - "Do not believe the hype".
What hype? The films are both over 30 years old and have been out on DVD for years.
Line 3 - "One or two interesting moments but that is all".
What can I say about that - well its of no use to anybody wanting to know about the films thats for sure.
There are two films in this set, you've given them both 1 star and written a review of 28 words for the DVD set (never mind any extras). Either you're doing it to wind people up (its working) or are incapable/can't be bothered to justify your sweeping generalisations.
As per my comment on your review of Unforgiven I am the first to say you have a perfect right to dislike the films and to post a 1 star reviews. However backing up your 1 star reviews with some substance would help people to make informed decisions about their purchases.
Go ahead make my day!