Customer Review

38 of 45 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars IMPORTANT BUT SHALLOW, 12 May 2012
This review is from: The New Few: Or a Very British Oligarchy (Hardcover)
Ferdinand Mount's "The New Few" is destined to be an important book, contributing to the national debate despite its superficial analyses and anemic prescriptions.

"Few" is an important book because its headline topics of income inequality and the alienation of the masses have visceral appeal in today's disgruntled society and because its author is not a bleeding heart liberal but a well credentialed Tory whose book will receive prominent reviews in the national press. Mount's fluent and confident prose doesn't hurt either.

In terms of diagnosis, Mount's almost impassioned analysis is thin soup compared to the FT `s Washington correspondent, Ed Luce's, recent "Time to Start Thinking" which addresses more of the same issues in US society and is all the more alarming for its comprehensiveness.

Mount's book provides food for thought and almost a call to action but its diagnosis focuses on two only loosely (one might say, sloppily) related themes: growing income inequality in Britain and the relentless centralization of power and disengagement of constituents in our political society.Mount mentions global competition but fails to reflect on its consequences for the prosperity of skilled blue collar and many white collar workers. He spends little time examining other root causes such as how decades of misguided social, educational and industrial policy have hollowed out society and left the country almost devoid of both skills and values.

Given the incompleteness of "The New Few's" diagnosis, it is not surprising that its prescriptions for a cure are unconvincing. Shareholder restraint on compensation (Mount cites JP Morgan -the man not the bank's - rule of thumb that a CEO should earn no more than 20 times the average worker. I doubt if the robber baron came any closer to living by this rule than Mao did to his own benchmark of 4:1), stricter regulation of banks, and devolution of political power are all on the Coalition's agenda; no one expects them to make any difference. Mount diagnoses brain cancer and prescribes vinegar and brown paper.

Mount may add fuel to the call for a mansion tax (even though shareholder activism rather than taxation is his preferred solution), but all of his `oligarchs,' many of them foreigners who contribute enormously to tax revenue and consumer spending but do not place any demands on the National Health, state education or social services, could be rounded up and expelled (or worse) and Britain's reality TV generation would still not be able to compete in the world market against the education-hungry, hard working, savings junkies of Asia and their mercantile , long-game playing governments. The book may become important but it is also dangerous in that it feeds populist angst without addressing real solutions.

The book is almost worth reading alone for the term "Croupier's take" (which Mount quotes from Warren Buffet) referring to the 7.3 billion raked off the economy each year by financial middlemen who provide dubious or negative real value.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 10 Jul 2012 12:03:00 BDT
Lark says:
This is a very interesting review, are you recommending the book with the caveat that it provides no panacea and underestimates the (negative) legacies of past governments?

It seems like you share his perspective to a point but consider it inadequate, are your and the author's concerns just different? His narrower and yours broader? I guess perhaps this is the case since what you mention recommends the other book whose subject is American society is more comprehensive. I am also a little unsure about what you mean by populism and would be interested to hear clarification of that point.

The position you highlight yourself of a country dependent upon foreign nationals for tax revenue and consumer spending, is that something from this book or reflected upon in it? If so how does the author believe it came about? Is it off shore tax havens and "treasure islands" or does the UK have no domestic wealthy elites?

Finally, just on a point of interest, is Mao's benchmark cited in this book or were do you get that reference from?

Posted on 1 Nov 2012 20:22:35 GMT
D. Campbell says:
I have read Mount's book and fully endorse Diacha's critique. In fact the 'Few' is a book, aand there are many around, which succeed in upsetting you to no avail.I am kind of addicted to such books and all I get is pain. Is there no help!!!!

In reply to an earlier post on 22 Nov 2013 01:49:05 GMT
Yes, help is at hand; try, for example, GRECO "The End of Money", and/or BUDD "Finance at the Threshold" - be prepared for some hard re-thinking, but surely a glad change from books that require very little and so only give you the "pain" of no hope for the future. Hope you find them stimulating.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details


4.0 out of 5 stars (27 customer reviews)
5 star:
4 star:
3 star:
2 star:
1 star:
18.99 15.19
Add to basket Add to wishlist

Location: London

Top Reviewer Ranking: 2,266