Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Remember this is fiction..., 17 Mar. 2011
This review is from: Ghost Writer [DVD] [2010] [Region 1] [US Import] [NTSC] (DVD)
The Ghost Writer is one of those political conspiracy films which is firmly rooted in fiction but makes enough references to real people and real events to create the illusion of something more sinister.

In The Ghost Writer, Ewan McGregor is hired to provide a final edit to former UK Prime Minister Adam Lang's memoirs. McGregor's predecessor had gone missing in action and ended up washed up on a beach in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. Lang is a thinly veiled allusion to Tony Blair; his wife Ruth to Cherie Blair, and the disillusioned (and bearded) former Foreign Secretary, Richard Rycart, was clearly based on Robin Cook, albeit a version who had not died whilst walking in Scotland.

The basic premise is good. The Ghost Writer inadvertently uncovers more and more secrets as he goes along - never acting as an investigative journalist but merely satisfying his own curiosity. The level of menace is good. Right from the outset, the Martha's Vineyard setting is used to create claustrophobia. The Ghost Writer is surrounded by evil forces that lurk barely seen, right in the periphery of vision. The locations are terrific, the camera shots are stunning and the wilderness setting is slightly reminiscent of Wallender.

The actual plot seems plausible at first. Adam Lang is a man obsessed by legacy and having the final say. He is dogged by accusations of having colluded in war crimes and seeks the protection of a private and secure beach house whilst making the occasional foray out onto the US speaker circuit. He has a great sense of control freakery and a vicious temper. And, quite usefully, he has a man to run along behind him and pick up the things he breaks in fits of pique.

But as the levels of conspiracy grow, holes in the plot start to appear. Fundamentally, the central assumptions behind the conspiracy make no sense. Why would people have behaved as they apparently did in the past - and why are they taking things so seriously now? The evidence that the Ghost Writer finds consists of little more than an unfounded allegation by the previous Ghost Writer and a couple of photos suggesting that Lang's claim to have entered politics to win Ruth's heart were not strictly true. In reality, inconsistencies between Adam Lang's official story and actual facts could be brushed away as poetic licence; the allegations had no supporting evidence and Lang's subsequent political career was what it was - conducted in the public gaze and subject to public accountability. In other words, it is all a bit of a storm in a teacup. But if you can go along with the story line it does make for some genuinely suspenseful scenes and a memorable ending.

The one aspect that really did grate was the Richard Rycart/Robin Cook character. The real Robin Cook had not supported Tony Blair's decision to go to war in Iraq and resigned from the Government. He did so with sadness and dignity. He did not cause mayhem from the back benches; he did not seek to embarrass Tony Blair or the Labour Party. He took a principled position and stood by it. Rycart, however, is portrayed as a bitter and scheming man intent on pursuing a personal vendetta against Lang (who had sacked him). Robin Cook deserved better treatment than this.

So, as political fiction this does score reasonably well - but please don't mistake it for fact.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 18 Mar 2011 14:17:50 GMT
Last edited by the author on 18 Mar 2011 15:23:10 GMT
"but please don't mistake it for fact."

That's exactly what you've done. The film, like the book it is based on, is indeed FICTION. Therefore, your unnecessary rant about the "Richard Rycart/Robin Cook character" does not stand up to scrutiny and is pointless.

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Mar 2011 08:42:58 GMT
I think it's a case of mud sticks. Even though this is obviously fictitious, there is still a mental association built up between the real life character and the fictitious events. In the same way, I know that Ricky Gervais's Extras is fictitious but I can't help thinking of snorting cocaine at the Baftas whenever I see Ronnie Corbett.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›