7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
A brief synopsis,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Messianic Legacy (Paperback)
Many thinking Christians will already be aware of the part that St Paul and, later, Constantine, had in shaping the religion they know today. This book fills out some historical details which illustrate in an astonishing way the contrast between "gentle Jesus meek and mild" and how much more ruggedly He would have been perceived as The Leader in the context of His time and place. It also proposes that as a Jew it would have been most odd if Jesus had not been married and had children. This unusual slant on Jesus explains in one stroke the many anomalies and inconsistencies in the Gospels as manipulated by Paul and Constantine. This is a challenging section for Christians, but the authors treat your beliefs with utmost respect and assert that what they have come up with is already known to theological students (includes your local priest) and will deepen, rather than wipe out, the beliefs of a serious Christian disciple.
The next section is a cogent, sweeping piece of work which explains the human need for something to believe in, and how 20th century dictatorships stage-managed events to fill those needs. If you ever wondered how a beast like Hitler could charm one of the most civilised peoples on Earth, here is one plausible explanation. Really worth reading, in my opinion.
The last section suggests there is a quasi-secret organisation of aristocratic families who have held "the secret" that Jesus did marry and his bloodline continues today. This society holds an intention that one day the heirs to David's line, through Jesus, will come to rule. It sounds corny in this précis form, but there is hard evidence that this society exists and is both serious and influential.
So, the thread that runs through the book is that Jesus was from the royal lineage of David (undoubtedly true) had children (most probably) and his heirs exist today. I found this argument weakening and running out of steam towards the end, however.
Conspiracy theorists will love it; academics, pedants and fundamentalists will hate it. If you are open-minded, go for it. You will definitely learn a new slant on certain aspects of history.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 24 Feb 2010 19:03:49 GMT
Last edited by the author on 24 Feb 2010 19:05:47 GMT
beyond the wall says:
MaxC - "Jesus was from the royal lineage of David (undoubtedly true)" ... what royal lineage of David? because this is how it is described in the OT, but nowhere else? .. archeology of the last decades clearly gives the lie to any super-David-Solomon kingdom .. Judah in the 10th, even the 9th, century BCE was a sparsely populated, insignificant, little kingdom, with Jerusalem having a pop of around 1000 .. the clear implication that it was the Judahites of the 8th century who fabricated this story; using Omri and Ahab, of 9th century Israel, as their template; to show that they should be the true leaders of a united kingdom, and not the Israelites, hence the 'weak' Israelite king Saul ... thus making Jesus son of a (fictional) legend .. David at most being just a local chieftain, if he even existed at all .. a consideration for just about every major character in the whole Judeo-Christian story
‹ Previous 1 Next ›