Customer Review

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Historical Truth, 8 July 2009
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: New Testament History (Library of Theology) (Hardcover)
Although written forty years ago F F Bruce's New Testament History remains a classic scholarly study of the political and philosophical background before, during and after the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. In this book Bruce traces, in infinite and objective detail, the context of the Jewish Messianic Hope prevalent at the time of Jesus. He also identified the sources and interpretations of that Hope amongst the various Jewish groups living under Roman rule.

Bruce specialised in the study of Paul the Apostle and there are plenty of references to Paul's influence as an early convert to the Christian faith. However, the book is also a brilliant description of Judaea during the Roman occupation, the philosophical schools prevalent at the time (including the different Helenistic influences) and the Jewish politico-religious groups including the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes and Zealots. The political nature of these sects (which Josephus referred to as schools, "after the Greek fashion") was expressed in their doctrine and attitude towards Roman authority. Bruce's own characterisation of each of them is masterful.

Bruce was a member of the Plymouth Brethren but did not share the dispensationalist outlook sometimes associated with their teachings. He also differed on the nature of Biblical inerrancy taking the view that the Bible was historically accurate but not necessarily precise. However, in his view, a lack of precision did not invalidate the historical record. Neither did any passages open to debate invalidate the Christian gospel or its theological implications. As he pointed out, "Apart from the New Testament writings and later writings dependent on these our sources of information about the life and teaching of Jesus are scanty and problematic" However, he noted, this is not surprising using the example of Haji Mirza Ali Khan, Fakir of Ipi, to illustrate his point superbly.

Bruce draws attention to the non Christian sources of information about Christians including Suetonius, Josephus, Tacitus and others and he is not averse to questioning original works where he thinks they may have been modified to suit Christian tastes. He also makes reference to the Gospel of Thomas pointing out, "it may well be genuine" but drawing attention to the difficulties involved in authenticating a document which appears without any life-context.

However, there is clear life-context for Bruce's description of the primitive Jerusalem church, the conflict between Christians and orthodox Jewish authority as well as conflict between Jews and Gentiles all of which is set in its political, social and religious context. His description of time and place is an essential read for anyone seeking to establish the truth about early Christianity whether as an apologist or critic. Bruce was an expert in his subject and an objective historian of the highest quality. Where matters are uncertain he states so quite specifically.

Bruce would not have accepted the claims put forward by those who suggest that Paul created Christianity (a view developed in Germany theologians during the nineteenth century and whose supporters included Adolph Hitler). For Bruce, Paul preached the gospel of the risen Christ - whatever the consequences. Everything else (including pastoral duties) were secondary to that evangelical role. All this is described with the scholarly detachment expected of a Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis.

New Testament History is a book of the greatest integrity which demands to be read and has stood the test of time. A five star rating well deserved.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 17 Apr 2011 09:47:31 BDT
K. Moss says:
Helpful review, Phil.
Thanks,
Kevin

In reply to an earlier post on 17 Apr 2011 13:31:05 BDT
Neutral says:
Kevin,

Professor Bruce remains the touchstone for anyone who is interested in establishing the integrity and limitations of the written evidence we call the Bible. His acceptance of those limitations in particular contrasts sharply with the caricature of blind faith evangelical believers often forwarded by those whose prime motive is to attack Christian belief and deny the historical existence of Christ.

By the same token, of course, it also contrasts with those Christians for whom the word "problematic" equates with heresy. Professor Bruce was a member of the Open Brethren but did not accept the dispensation interpretation of Biblical or world history professed by some Brethren members. Those who heard him shared his view.

In reply to an earlier post on 17 Apr 2011 14:31:03 BDT
K. Moss says:
Hi Neutral.

You are absolutely right. I first read Prof. Bruce when I was at Uni, although the copy I now have is a more updated version. It is certainly solid and robust in its approach to the NT narratives.

A book which does much the same, with a similar degree of academic robustness is: The Old Testament Documents: Are They Reliable and Relevant?.

I had an opportunity to study under Dr. Kaiser in Cambridge in 2008, and he was a fascinating man. Even at 75, he had an energy on his feet whilst lecturing, and a penetrating mind when it came to distinguishing between competing theories in relation to the OT documents. My only criticism of his book would be the typesetting, which for some reason appears to impede the easy flow of one's reading.

Regards,

Kevin
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

5.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

4 star
0

3 star
0

2 star
0

1 star
0

Out of stock
Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Location: UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 4,821