Customer Review

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars A house built on straw, 13 May 2011
This review is from: Uncle Jack (Hardcover)
Tony Williams is a competent enough writer, but the idea that he has come up with a likely candidate for Jack the Ripper in his distant relative, the eminent Victorian medic Sir John Williams, is a heap of speculation built on very little. Nor is his 'I didn't want to believe it, but...' tone remotely credible; it is quite clear from the outset that Williams wants to convict his famous forebear.

The evidence is scanty to the point of non-existent. Williams lived in London in 1888, he had links to the London Hospital in the Whitechapel area, he may have run informal clinics in Whitechapel, he apparently - though even this is disputed - performed an abortion on one of the Ripper's victims in 1885, he was a strange and rather arrogant man in an unhappy marriage and he is rumoured to have had another woman. Called Mary. Like the Ripper's last victim. And several hundred thousand others in Britain at the time.

Oh, and he left among other things a surgeon's knife to the passion of his later life, the National Library of Wales, which may or may not have human blood on it. Anyone would think he was a surgeon or something. Ah, hang on a minute...

And really that's about it. There is nothing to say that Williams was ever a suspect, no identification evidence, no shred of a motive - though garnering specimens for medical research is hinted at - just nothing. Even the wildly improbable candidature of James Maybrick has the much-debated diary to back it up. That this kind of thesis still gets aired has more to do with our love of conspiracy theories and the wish for 'significant' crimes to have a 'significant' perpetrator, rather than the poor, local, sex-crazed nutcase that Jack the Ripper almost certainly was.

This isn't the worst book ever written on Jack the Ripper, but it's definitely at the Hartlepool United end of the league. If you really want a proper analysis rather than the twisting of selected facts to fit a predetermined conclusion, read Paul Begg or Philip Sugden.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 14 Jun 2012 13:48:46 BDT
100101 says:
"That this kind of thesis still gets aired has more to do with our love of conspiracy theories and the wish for 'significant' crimes to have a 'significant' perpetrator, rather than the poor, local, sex-crazed nutcase that Jack the Ripper almost certainly was."

i don't think the ripper was a sex crazed nutcase although he is labelled one (lust killer) there was no indication of the sort, his agenda it seems was the removal of the vital organs and womb(particulary the uterus) and the heart from mary kelly his last that we know off,very strange for a sexually motivated crime.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Hampton, UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 58,074