Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Reasons to be cheerful, part 4?, 26 Sept. 2011
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Made In Britain: How the Nation Earns Its Living (Hardcover)
Britain, the doomsayers would have you believe, is sinking in a dead-end economy in which manufacturing is reduced to an insignificant rump, replaced by burger-flipping and call centres. The common complaint, here as in the US and, no doubt, Japan, is "We used to make stuff..."

In this well-balanced assessment of the reality of post-modern British industry, Evan Davis tries to cheer up the Eeyores, first of all showing that, despite conceptions to the contrary, our European neighbours France and Germany also don't manufacture that much any more, and that although Americans are in aggregate better off at least we don't have to work their hours. More importantly, what we do manufacture is pretty damn good; world leading, in fact, when we look at UK companies like GlaxoSmithKline, ARM Holdings and Brompton, but also in foreign-owned factories such as that of Nissan near Sunderland.

That's less than half the story, though, (in fact, less than a quarter) because the majority of British industry is based on services, and there we really are good. We just need to ensure we understand how to stay ahead of the game in that respect, as emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil move up the value chain, and there the government has a crucial role to play in ensuring it not only encourages the right behaviours but also in ensuring it does not stifle the success stories. For example, in imposing increasingly restrictive conditions on student visas we not only deny ourselves the revenues from tuition fees from newly affluent citizens of the rising economies, we also deny ourselves access to overseas talent. Davis uses the example of post 9/11 US policy to demonstrate the potential effects.

Davis's writing is very accessible, and he has written for non-specialists, being very sparing with economic terminology, although he does explain the concepts of gross value added and comparative advantage well. His treatment of the 1960s "I'm backing Britain" campaign is hilarious, and he also deals with objections to working conditions in overseas joint venture firms: the living quarters of Chinese workers in a British-Chinese suit factory in Shandong Province are certainly sparse, but beat anything described in Orwell's Down And Out In Paris And London. Particularly user friendly is his use of an analogy from Wolfe's The Bonfire Of The Vanities to explain how the finance industry profits from the "crumbs" of its transactions.

There are without doubt some oversights. Strangely, in dealing with the benefits of overseas talent he overlooks one of the UK's biggest contributions to the new economy, fibreoptic technology, developed in the 1960s in Harlow by Sir Charles Kao, an overseas-born graduate of UCL, an internationally renowned institution. There's also no mention of the British fashion industry, worth twice as much to GDP as manufacturing, and he references JK Rowling and Harry Potter but not the potential for the British film industry.

The book is also shot through with an inordinate amount of bad editing, with many forms of the verb "to be" totally lost, numerous stray prepositions, a couple or three sentences which can only be understood through deep analysis, and typos such as "excised" for "exercised" and "economy" for "economic".

Overall, though, this is a good book, worthwhile reading and perhaps for buying for anyone wishing we could go back to the golden age of steam trains, coal mines and blast furnaces.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 11-14 of 14 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on 9 Jun 2012 13:31:47 BDT
therealus says:
Table manners.

And frankly, if I were your friend and you couldn't be bothered with correct table manners then I wouldn't be your friend for very long. Have you no respect? My advice is to step away from the shovel.

In reply to an earlier post on 9 Jun 2012 14:06:31 BDT
Last edited by the author on 9 Jun 2012 14:50:05 BDT
In answer, I respect you and your viewpoint. You believe you are right to correct the author of this book for his mistakes, and I believe I am right to defend him. If you post comments that contain some critical parts, it is only fair that you can expect a debate? So I feel it is my right to "stay with the shovel" for as long as I feel it necessary. My whole point: was there anything really worth correcting in the first place?

My viewpoint is that the book gives an original and largely correct viewpoint of the big picture. Big pictures are very important, more so than details, IF the details are minor and make no actual difference (the book communicates all it needs to). This article in Guardian a few days ago was interesting and shares some of my views on this matter. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/05/queen-english-language

And are you saying that if we were friends and I used the wrong fork while eating with you, you would discount me as a friend? If it mattered to you and I valued your friendship I would learn this and use it while with you. As it would be a minor point I would let it drop, as our overall friendship would be more important.

In reply to an earlier post on 10 Jun 2012 17:05:10 BDT
Last edited by the author on 10 Jun 2012 17:05:53 BDT
therealus says:
OK. I think I've seen enough bedwetting. He terminado.

In reply to an earlier post on 10 Jun 2012 17:38:08 BDT
I take it he won't answer now, "terminado". To all who may read this I believe he applied that "bedwetting" at myself. Name calling and giving up is a little low, perhaps because the points that I argue fairly are valid viewpoints. With him it was his way or the highway. He took off down the highway.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details