26 of 33 people found the following review helpful
Warning - read this before you buy,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Liver and Gallbladder Miracle Cleanse: An All-natural, at Home Flush to Purify and Rejuvenate Your Body (Paperback)I am in my late 40's, 5feet 4inch, 8 1/2stone. Practice yoga regularly and am mainly vegetarian. Generally my health is above average.
I completed the miracle liver and gallbladder flush two days ago.
I have not slept for two nights due to having to constantly spit out bright white foam surrounded in mucous that smells a little of chemicals, and I mean constantly. If I do not spit then I can't breathe. My bronchial tubes have closed up after light exertion like walking upstairs as if I am an asthmatic. I have a burning sensation in my throat, nausea and there is absolutely no possibility of going to work. It would be terribly embarrassing to be spitting every 20seconds and I feel very weak, irritable and stuffy headed. I have not been able to go to my yoga class for three days or even go out of the house for that matter.
I followed Mr Mortiz's directions to the letter except that the first tablespoon of epsom salts dissolved in 6ozs of water was taken fifteen mins later than suggested.
My first thought was that perhaps I am allergic to epsom salts, but, in accordance with Mr Mortiz's advice, I took the prescribed amount that was written on the packet, before the liver cleanse to cleanse the colon and experienced no discomfort. It could be that the four tablespoons of epsom salts if too much for someone of my mass - who knows..
If I suddenly start feeling amazing I will add a post script to this review, by the way I did pass about 20 gall stones (if that is what they were).
Tracked by 5 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 11-20 of 24 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on 7 May 2012 17:28:12 BDT
Last edited by the author on 7 May 2012 17:31:48 BDT
The NHS not run by the pharma industry? That is pure bunkum, Chancery.. The NHS would rather fit toxic 52% mercury filling instead when teeth if fed the correct diet repair themselves.
I've seen documented proof online that says NHS doctors get paid bonuses for the amounts of vaccines they give young children. The information is out there people just need to open their eyes and research it themselves.
I know hundred of people who are benefitting from liver flushing and changing their diets and getting onto more natural foods and fermented food. The GAPS diet is essential for sorting out Autism and other issues more are suffering from.
Cleansing the liver and gallbladder and getting them working correctly is a key element to getting healthy. As is changing diet and learning what toxins are in the food, water supply and the environment and then doing something about getting them out of the body faster than they come in.
Some amazing information is available of people sorting people suffering with cancers and other 'degenerative' diseases the information is available online and not in the NHS? A great source of info is "oneradionetwork" for those seeking the truth.
In reply to an earlier post on 7 May 2012 17:57:14 BDT
Last edited by the author on 7 May 2012 17:58:39 BDT
No, the NHS is not run by the pharma industry, John, any more than government is run by Nestle or Apple. Do these companies influence governments? Absolutely. Do they occasionally collude to the public's disadvantage, intenionally or otherwise? Absolutely. But do they run it? No. You do your arguments no favours by employing histrionics and scaremongering overstatements. If you have hard facts, with sound statistics to back them up, then quote them, but your broad generalisations owe more to crank politics than evidence based science.
The last three NHS dentists I used over the course of the last fifteen years all said they no longer used mercury based fillings, that the NHS no longer recommended them, so where has your "The NHS would rather fit toxic 52% mercury filling" come from? 1956? Which date, by the way, inspires me to point out that many people, self included, are old enough to have old mercury based fillings and we are all still standing, with no signs of mercury poisoning. Mercury occurs as a trace element in many foods that people eat every day without problems. Some unlucky souls are sensitive to mercury, but that's a rare disorder, not a generalised complaint. In the world you will ALWAYS be able to find people sensitive to things in much lower doses than normal. This is no more proof of toxicity than saying peanuts are a dangerous poison because some people are allergic to them.
And you seem to be suggesting that vaccines are a bad thing for children. Why? Because they make them live longer? When I was a child you regularly saw people disabled by polio and scarred by small pox. You never see either condition nowdays. Do you REALLY want to return to the dark ages of infant mortality and see people's lives crippled by crushing illnesses and deformities? Why???
The likelihood of autism being sorted out by diet is slim to nil. It is almost certainly a psychological problem caused by dysfunction in childrearing. Yes, they may find a biochemical cause which MAY be influenced by diet, but the important thing is they haven't yet. At all. Just as they have found no good scientific evidence to support the scaremongering that it is caused by vaccines. Without that evidence, it is just rumour-mongering, and not helpful rumour-mongering at that.
Lastly,the 'toxins' in food are not nearly as important to the human body's good functioning as is eating nutritious food, and, even more importantly, NOT overeating. More human ailments are caused by over-nourishment than by any amount of mercury or nitrates. And that IS a fact, which ANY health statistics anywhere in the Western world will back up any day you care to name.
In reply to an earlier post on 7 May 2012 18:16:21 BDT
Mrs. J. M. Bunting says:
which just goes to show one man's medecine is another man's poison, and at the end of the day it is all about balance, and yes some of us are far more sensetive to theings than others. Everything in moderation, I believe is the key to better health.
In reply to an earlier post on 25 Aug 2012 19:10:26 BDT
Not all NHS dentists are fitting mercury filling correct, but the fact they haven't been banned is telling. You must have found 3 good ones who were aware of how toxic mercury is and stopped using for their own piece of mind and safety:
Documented proof that doctors are getting "back handers" as such for vaccinating a certain % is available here:
In reply to an earlier post on 26 Aug 2012 22:08:00 BDT
John, the paper you are quoting as evidence of "backhanders" is about the use of incentives for doctors to ensure that the maximum amount of children are immunized - i.e. protected from dangerous diseases. This is not a "backhander" as the term backhander means a secret payment. This is, on the contrary, an open scheme intended to keep the public healthy. It no more proves corruption than anti-drink-driving campaigns prove the government is trying to convert us to Mormonism. They are upfront attempts to save lives.
In reply to an earlier post on 26 Aug 2012 22:52:41 BDT
If the vaccines were "healthy" the doctors wouldn't need "bribes" to administer them. Many vaccines have mercury within them.. You really need to investigate more Chancery Stone.
I am sure if people really knew before they had vaccines 'recommended to them' by the doctors, that the doctors were paid up to £2400 (1999 money, I am sure this figure is more now). That people may think differently about having them.
Now if vaccines were safe why would there be a "vaccine damage form" in most NHS clinics in their form racks?
£120,000 for a disabled life does not seem right.
Enough information for anyone to make an informed decision about the "health" benefits of vaccines...
If you type "vaccines" and "Bill Gates" into Youtube you will also see it is a front for a sterilisation program in Africa.
In reply to an earlier post on 30 Aug 2012 21:55:36 BDT
John, Tuna has mercury in it, in sizeable amounts. People who eat a lot of sushi are in danger of mercury poisoning, but it seldom happens. Pensioners eating cheap tinned tuna are not keeling over in their thousands daily. Due to a health problem, I eat tinned tuna on average twice a day - and I'm still not dead, or poisoned, or even sick from all that lethal mercury. As previously stated, mercury is a naturally occurring element, you eat it all the time, along with iron, lead, tin, silver and lots of other metallic and chemical compounds, none of which I'd recommend you chewed on for a snack. Demonising mercury serves little function unless you have some concrete evidence (other than its known toxic qualities) to back it up.
As for the doctors' payments, £2400 is the very top figure, and that's for ALL the patients vaccinated, not per patient. Most doctors wouldn't make this much. But that's irrelevant, because they are being paid £35,000+ a year just to see you and me. All that money just for having patients on their books. Is that the government bribing them to take patients? You can't decide one payment is a bribe and the rest is salary. This is how the NHS works, it's not corruption going on behind closed doors, it's not the NHS paying for doctors gambling or claiming for prostitutes on their expenses.
As for the "vaccine damage form" I have no idea what this is, nor have I ever seen one, but you do realise that hospitals are full of such documents, all in the event of some medicine or operation going wrong? This is the risk with medicine. I, for example, can't use Ibuprofen, but does this mean it's a dangerous drug and should be banned? No, it just means it's not safe for me. I always have to 'declare' it on medical forms.
What point are you making with the £120,000 payment for those damaged by vaccines? Surely if you don't want to be vaccinated, or have your child vaccinated, you can just opt out of it and run the risk of disablement from polio, or death - that would deal with all your problems. I believe in the UK you can be a conscientious objector and refuse to have them? Is this unsatisfactory in some way?
Lastly, are you seriously offering a search for Bill Gates + vaccines on Youtube as a source of credible information? Seriously?
In reply to an earlier post on 30 Aug 2012 22:23:20 BDT
Research from university showing that Mercury Kills Brain Cells (Neurons)
I'm glad you enjoy tuna. I suggest you also look into a book and studies done by some researchers who ate lots of tinned tuna, their mercury level did go up... It is documented in "slow death by rubber duckie" you can find it if you like... But with the amount of tinned tuna you eat you probably can't be bothered. Mercury does kill brain cells as shown above, but everything in moderation 1 -2 tins a month is fine... the BPa from the tin liner is probably just as bad for you.
I'm so glad you have every confidence in the NHS and vaccines. I don't know any doctors, but I very much doubt they are on only 35k a year. I actually know someone personally that was infertile from a childhood vaccine.
In reply to an earlier post on 31 Aug 2012 21:55:30 BDT
Let's speed this conversation up, John. You believe the government is paying doctors large sums of money to trick the public into having dangerous vaccines. Why would they do that? What's in it for them?