Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

36 of 46 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars For completists only, 16 Oct. 2011
This review is from: Agrippina (Audio CD)
Agrippina and René Jacobs go back a long time. I remember a stage production in the Brussels Monnae opera in May 2000, directed by Robert Carsen with Jacobs in the pit. The opera was a revelation with a dream cast: Anna Catharina Antonacci was Agrippina, Rosemary Joshua sang Poppea and Lawrence Zazzo was a youthful Ottone. Very soon after this production, rumours were spread that Jacobs would record Agrippina. It took him 10 years to finally realize this recording and the only one to survive from the 2000 cast is Domique Visse in the small role of Narciso.
In these 10 years, the recording I grew accustomed to was Gardiner's, a model of professionalism with a cast of Baroque specialists. Alas, Jacobs' cast is almost uniformely inferior to Gardiner's. Moreover, Jacobs' extremely dramatic direction often asks for overacting from the singers, which is simply not necessary with a libretto that speaks for itself.
The opera is dominated by Agrippina, sung by Della Jones in the Gardiner recording. She is very cunning and funny in the recitatives, and although her voice is not the most pleasant, she won me over in a completely compelling interpretation.
What to think of Jacobs' Pendatchanska? She is surely a gifted singer, with shrill high notes, but quite some exciting moments. To name one: Jacobs reorchestrated her Act 1 aria 'Tu ben digno' to great effect, Gardiner sounds dull there in comparison.
But, in the recitatives, she does not convince me she is Agrippina. It must be the overacting that spoils it for me and the shrillness of the voice makes listening to her tiresome. A missed opportunity, since Antonacci would have been perfect...
Jacobs cannot image Nerone to be sung by a countertenor, so he choose the mezzo Jennifer Rivera for that role. Nonetheless, the countertenor Derek Lee Ragin copes much better with the high lying tessitura of Nerone, Rivera struggles with the notes and is simply miscast. Another idea of Jacobs is that Claudio should be sung by a bass-baritone and not by a deep bass. The low D in his aria 'Cada il mondo' can hardly be sung by a bass-baritone, and that expresses the ridicule nature of the emperor. That may be true from a dramatical point of view, but on record I like to hear the low notes as written by the composer. Gardiner's Alastair Miles has all the notes and more than that: his interpretation can and will never be bettered. The same goes for Micheal Chance's Ottone, innocence impersonated. Again Jacobs chooses a singer, Bejun Mehta, whose voice is an acquired taste. To me, just another miscast.
I love both Poppeas equally, a great portrait of the vanity of women. Her entrance aria 'Vaghe perle' is in my opinion one of the best Handel composed.
The other roles are much smaller, although I must point out that Dominique Visse is much better than the bland countertenor Jonathan Peter Kenny in the Gardiner recording.
You certainly do not have to buy Jacobs for the better singing, but maybe there is another reason of interest: Jacobs uses another edition of the opera. There are numerous differences in the score, especially in the second half of the opera. Here, I can follow Jacobs' alterations. We get a lot of new arias, which should better reflect the intentions of the composer.
Ultimately, this recording is for Agrippina completists. If you want just one, Gardiner is still the one to have.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 17 Dec 2012 01:20:10 GMT
Z. Gulaboff says:
Dear Nico,
For your information, Alexandrina Pendachanska is nominated for a Grammy award for this particular performance, shrill or not (in your opinion). The ceremony is on 10 February 2013. Check the results. You might have to update your review and your opinion.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details


3.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)
5 star

4 star

2 star

1 star

Add to basket Add to wishlist

Top Reviewer Ranking: 7,205,613