Customer Review

11 of 37 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars So 1980s, 26 Aug 2010
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: So (Audio CD)
As someone who liked early Genesis, I didn't need any persuading to follow Peter Gabriel's solo career and bought all four 'magazine' albums soon after they were released. The gap from the third to the fourth was quite long, however, and longer still to 'So' (admittedly there was the 'Birdy' soundtrack and 'Live' in between). By the time 'So' appeared, digital recording techniques had long supplanted analogue, making this a radically different experience. And that is where I guess I differ most from the many who rate this album highly. I avoided it when it was originally released, partly because of the hype, partly because the hit singles didn't overly impress me, and partly because of what the recording culture did to it. 'Sledgehammer' is decent and contains some of Gabriel's old lyrical panache, but the video sold it. 'Don't Give Up' is tired and depressing, but record buyers were suckers for superstar duets. So many people have recommended this to me, however, that I thought it was worth a try. Oh dear.

When I listen to the much-maligned early albums, which when released received deservedly high acclaim, I feel as if I'm listening to a band of musicians rather than an exercise in multi-tracking. In addition, Gabriel had so many different ideas then, musically and lyrically. He could evoke every shade of emotion. 'So', by contrast, is a flatliner. It is machine music with the kind of ambience a band could not recreate on stage (if any band did, I'd walk out), one which blighted so many recordings in the late 1980s. It is the kind of album you would have bought to show off your hi-fi system. As such, it is a very dated album. The percussion is overdone and intrusive while the other instruments seem to exist in their own vacuum. The whole thing sounds so sterile that Gabriel sounds as if he's had the stuffing knocked out of him. Even the lyrics are not what they're cracked up to be. 'Red Rain' consists of little more than 'Red rain is coming down'. If he'd said it was coming up, it would have at least sounded vaguely interesting.

'So' is therefore little more than a product of its time alongside other hideous, similar-sounding products of the late 1980s, such as the albums being knocked out by the likes of The Cars and INXS. In Gabriel's case, this is no disgrace. Almost every recording artist's best work comes in youth and early maturity, followed by decline, and though 'So' was huge by comparison with Gabriel's earlier work, it is no coincidence that it was his first album to be subjected to a major promotional campaign. As much as I love his earlier albums, however, I would not recommend them to anyone who liked 'So', as I cannot imagine anyone who liked this liking those.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-6 of 6 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 4 Nov 2010 19:12:51 GMT
A. Kennedy says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 28 Mar 2012 01:39:12 BDT
Bloom says:
SO wrong silly,it's sad

Posted on 29 Mar 2012 03:39:22 BDT
So right , every album until this one was brilliant, saw him about 5 times in 1982, including the womad concert (Genesis).
He definatly lost the magic here, everything is formulated so therefore sterile and stale, and as said very eighties,never mind.

Posted on 25 Sep 2012 22:52:40 BDT
inkster says:
I like "SO".
I also like PG's earlier albums.

Posted on 15 Nov 2012 17:14:35 GMT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 23 Apr 2014 08:34:31 BDT
AK 1957-05 says:
Good review - this is where Peter and I parted company (I had been a fan since early Genesis). The low point is the Bush duet (and I'm still a huge Kate fan, but this was MOR in excelsis). It's the epitome of that "sophisticated" Eigthies music that salesmen would play in their BMWs in order to feel "edgy" - see also Dire Straits, Simply Red).
In Peter's defence, I will say that I have seen him perform some of these songs live and they were amazing. But as the reviewer says, that airless, Eighties studio sheen totally does for this album.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

So
4.6 out of 5 stars (118 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (87)
4 star:
 (19)
3 star:
 (10)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Location: Hull, UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 817