Customer Review

88 of 94 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Misleading!, 8 Jan 2014
This review is from: Philomena: The true story of a mother and the son she had to give away (film tie-in edition) (Paperback)
If you think you are going to read Philomena's story - You are wrong. This is Michael Hess ( Antony) story. It centres on his journey through life feeling rejected and alone. He embarks on a career in Law which takes him to the Whitehouse, rubbing shoulders with the President, and partying in Gay Bars, progressing to a life that includes a sordid and depraved side, often pushing aside those that come to love him and selling out fellow friends and associates that are homesexual to further his career, and save himself from public humiliation.You have every sympathy for his situation, and his lost identity, but he did have a good family, a mum who loved him, and a sister that shared his past and present life.His attempts to find his real Mum were rather half hearted in my opinion, and he didn't really appreciate the love and education that his adoptive family provided.
It is an emotive subject, and I really wanted to read Philomena's story and how it affected her. Unfortunately this book does not cover her story at all. Maybe I will have to watch the film, but I do feel the title of the book is misleading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 4 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 11-20 of 25 posts in this discussion
Posted on 3 Mar 2014 21:57:44 GMT
Cloudberry says:
Most are agreed that the book is a very good read but that the title of the book is misleading. This may well have been the publishers' ploy after the film went into production (I'm guessing, I don't know). The small print in the front of the book where it mentions about the copyright etc. informs us that it was first published under the title "The Lost Child of Philomena Lee".

For those who have said the will not see the film, I would recommend it. Yes, you now know what happens, but the film does focus on Philomena and the help Martin Sixsmith gives her - acted brilliantly by Judi Dench and Steve Coogan.

Going back to the book title, I think whoever decided on the change has been clever but very naughty. They need their wrists slapped hard by .... Trade Descriptions Act people?

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Mar 2014 11:30:25 GMT
Biffy says:
Well i was a bit disappointed that Philomena almost "disappeared" from the book but my interpretation of that is Martin Sixsmith intends to write another book about Philomena and the man who was the Father of Anthony (Michael). Time will tell!

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Mar 2014 12:02:35 GMT
Josquine says:
I agree with the general tenor of the principal review and this comment - but it wasn't a disappointing read except to the extent that it wasn't what I expected.

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Mar 2014 12:03:53 GMT
Last edited by the author on 6 Mar 2014 12:07:53 GMT
Josquine says:
DO go and see the film - it's not at all like this book, and is brilliant. I'm sure you'll love it. However, the final chapter of the book shows that the film contains an immense amount of dramatic licence.

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Mar 2014 12:05:07 GMT
Josquine says:
The back cover's actually about the film, not the book, but you have to read the words very carefully to realise that.

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Mar 2014 12:34:07 GMT
jilly says:
I agree with you Josquine, I was just annoyed that the back of the book says it was about Philomena's search for her son, and that wasn't so, in fact I was really puzzled.

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Mar 2014 14:25:59 GMT
Josquine. Read the back again. It clearly say's marttin sixsmith,s book delves into a woman's grief with restraint and dignity. This BOOK is not about Philomena and therefore misleading!

In reply to an earlier post on 12 Mar 2014 20:07:54 GMT
BrynG says:
The original title of this book was "The Lost Child of Philomena Lee". This old title is clearly more representative of the content. I still think it's a fascinating and heart-rending tale, but I completely agree that the new title is misleading (although it is appropriate for the film which is about the search)

Posted on 17 Mar 2014 21:00:43 GMT
I agree completely with these views. I was given the book and was very much looking forward to reading about 'a mother's search for her son'. What a let-down! I have never been so disappointed in a book. After reading it I certainly do not want to see the film.
The only lesson I have gained from Michael's story is that the antithesis of Polonius' advice to Laertes (Hamlet) is as true as the original. 'This above all, to thine own self be false and it shall follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be true to any man.

Posted on 23 Mar 2014 12:16:21 GMT
I agree with these comments. Having realised halfway through that it wasn't about Philomena at all, but a history lesson in US politics and AIDS, I skimmed to the end in a double quick time. Not what I was expecting at all. But I will still look forward to the film.

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: uk

Top Reviewer Ranking: 134,924