36 of 44 people found the following review helpful
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides (Perfect Paperback)
Game over, job done. What a book! Seven years of research into the truth of the Holocaust and eventually this book was published to summarise all the well known facts and issues on the matter. Calmly and scientifically the author worked his way through the big points like a top barrister in a court room battle. The bottom line is that yes there was a holocaust, the jews were indeed targeted, brutalised and mistreated. But no six million deaths or anything like that figure. Probably one million (though that of course was a million too many). It's been a con all along and now they have been exposed. So what happens now then? Will they give back the billions of dollars??? Great book well written and the perfect first stage if you are looking to understand the issues, or in my case last book, as I now conclude my research. I know the truth.
Tracked by 1 customer
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-6 of 6 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 23 Feb 2013 20:59:40 GMT
I'd take a look at this http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co
In reply to an earlier post on 10 Feb 2014 12:22:59 GMT
If you can stay awake long enough Dad, try reading The "Extermination Camps" of "Aktion Reinhardt"-An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious "Evidence," Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the "Holocaust Controversies" Bloggers, available to download for free from the Holocaust Handbooks homepage. In 1800 pages and nearly 4000 footnotes, the authors dismantle nearly every word by the pathetic and dishonest Holocaust Controversies bloggers. After that, you will no longer feel the need to make such fatuous, ignorant comments...
In reply to an earlier post on 17 Aug 2014 22:21:35 BDT
Never too tired to deal with people like you.....Right at the beginning of the above-mentioned "analysis" (p36) Mattogno et al refer to the testimony of Leuchter! This and the man himself have have long been discredited - easy to check online. However, if a "serious" work needs to refer to him so early on it's surely a sign of a lack of other more substantial evidence!
There is a huge amount of evidence of what took place during the holocaust - for example look at what David Irving says on pps 90-100 pf the court transcripts of Irving vs Lipstadt. As for Auschwitz, go to the holocaust controversies list of documents relating solely to extermination at this site and check them back to their sources - they've all been linked/referenced.
But then I suspect that you and some others in this section are not that interested in honestly and fairly analysing historical events.
Posted on 17 Aug 2014 22:47:51 BDT
The opening and closing words of this "review" tell you all you need to know about the arrogance of this person. They suggest a book brimming with conclusive proof but it actually just rehashes and repeats the same old tired and lazy myths, lies and half-truths which have been doing the rounds for years. Dalton has an eager (and profitable) potential audience desperate to soak up this sort of stuff but as an academic work it falls flat.
An "academic" who expects intelligent people to believe that a conspiracy has existed across the cold war divide, between thousands of people, over several countries and so many years to produce the thousands of eye witness reports, written testimonies and bureaucratic documentation proving the extent of the holocaust can only really be intending to reach people who are definitely not academic!
In reply to an earlier post on 31 Dec 2014 14:38:10 GMT
Last edited by the author on 1 Jan 2015 18:48:22 GMT
Rob opines that Thomas Dalton is:
"An 'academic' who expects intelligent people to believe that a conspiracy has existed across the cold war divide, between thousands of people, over several countries and so many years to produce the thousands of eye witness reports, written testimonies and bureaucratic documentation proving the extent of the holocaust can only really be intending to reach people who are definitely not academic!"
And yet all those "thousands of eye witness reports", as Gemar Rudolf incisively points out to the reader in page after page of his book called Lectures on the Holocaust, are certainly less than credible. As to that bureaucratic documentation which Rob alludes to it is instructive to note, as Jurgen Graf has done in his book called The Giant With Feet of Clay, that when the Soviets opened up their archives to the public in 1990 that not one of the 88,000 German documents which the Soviets had could show a drawing or photo which represented one of those infamous homicidal gas chambers. This is certainly most odd considering how meticulous and methodical the Germans were in their record keeping.
What is also odd is that instead of debating their opponents in public forums the Holocaust believers imprison them, savagely attack them, which is what occurred to French historian Robert Faurisson in the 1980s [that last beating in 1989 almost cost Faurisson his life], while also murdering them, which is what happened to French publisher Francois Duprat when a car bomb planted by Holocaust hoodlums exploded in his car in 1978. Duprat's wife was a little more fortunate as she "only" had to have her legs amputated after that explosion had occurred.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›