Another unscientific response from a Dawkins' fan. I wonder why he doesn't introduce some fan club guidelines on the website. Aren't you supposed to be specific, and cite page numbers, etc. and be disciplined?
What exactly is a 'disgraceful' book? How can you say that there is not 'a SINGLE positive argument in support of Christianity’? How about page 53 on Jesus? You may not rate what he says but that is a different matter.
The Dawkins' website seems to offer cheap degrees in 'ad hominem' spotting to the fans, but Dawkins cannot expect to get away with similar tactics on individuals (like Collins & S J Gould) who refused to acquiesce. Your contribution tells us that you found at least one AHA on each page of McGrath's book ('page after page')-. Did you really? Come on! Give us a break, Paula.
Hardly 'reassuringly rational', indeed neither reassuring nor rational - instead rather reassuringly rant-full!