55 of 64 people found the following review helpful
2, 5 kg of Queen Mum - a marvellous biography on an extraordinary personality,
This review is from: Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother: The Official Biography (Hardcover)
Queen Elisabeth, The Queen Mother or just Queen Mum was a household name all over the world. I suppose all of us who read this official biography have followed her life and have personal recollections of her. She war a fixture of royal life and events in her trademark clothes and pearls, always gracious and smiling, a real character and a real lady. Most of us will have formed an opinion about her.
Writing a biography on such a personality is not an easy task. Her first biographer Hugo Vickers had spent too much energy and pages on the Queen Mother's outfits and colour schemes of her dresses. He was all a bit to "loyal" and keeping with the myth, a bit to close to her and bit too admiring. Does William Shawcross fare better?
In my view yes indeed he does, very much so. He managed to get to the bottom of her personality, her basic functioning, and her basic personality: her great zest for life, her liking of people, her sense of duty and great loyalty and her positive approach to life in general, and her great sense of humour. But he is blind to her faults. There is a balance of this book - unless the official biography on Queen Mary he does not focus at length on her childhood and rushes through the "Queen Years". Of course, this is not my first biography of the Queen Mother and therefore not much came as a surprise to me, but there are new elements to discover. First, this is the first biography were one learns about the events and her views through herself - by her fantastic letters. Oh gosh how will future biographies been written? Based on text messages and emails...?? Secondly, the relationship with The King becomes clearer and more balanced. Popular view has it that she was the strong one and that he relied on her. Yes, that is true, but she relied very much on him too. It was a partnership in the true sense: Elizabeth & Bertie, Duke and Duchess and King and Queen together.
Shawcross is critised for having avoided the difficult issues - the abdication, her real political influence, her real political views. Well, I only agree partly. I think with regards to the abdication it is pretty clear where she stood and what she thought about it. Her attitude towards the Duchess of Windsor is as well crystal clear. That she was kind to the Duchess when she stayed in BP for the funeral of the Duke of Windsor is by far no indication of Shawcross glossing over the issue and white washing the Queen Mother. When it comes to her real political influence on running the monarchy with her husband and with her daughter indeed things are a bit more difficult. The Queen Mother was very discreet (or as she put it "very cagey") when it came to putting things into writing on political issues. Her letter exchange with Queen Mary on the abdication proves this quite clearly. The RF talked about it. Furthermore Princess Margret had scanned the writing and ordered many letters to be destroyed. She did what Princess Beatrice did with Queen Victoria's diaries. But I feel that Shawcross could have tried to find other means to find out. The same applies to the more recent ups and downs like the Charles-Diana-Camilla saga. So there is an area which can be explored further.
Before concluding a word on Shawcross style of writing: the whole book is written with a great flow and in very entertaining way. It is easy to read, without being superficial. It is massive (2,5 kg heavy), but never boring.
All in all, I think it is an excellent biography and properly the very best official biography I have ever read. Highly recommended.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 20 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 13 Nov 2009 21:59:14 GMT
Last edited by the author on 14 Nov 2009 13:12:13 GMT
nazi crack-pot and a lizard,to boot.
In reply to an earlier post on 14 Nov 2009 11:15:35 GMT
who? the Queen Mother? Get your history straight...she might haven many things but never a Nazi
In reply to an earlier post on 14 Nov 2009 14:48:53 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Nov 2009 20:26:51 GMT]
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Nov 2009 00:24:40 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Apr 2010 23:20:03 BDT]
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Nov 2009 14:51:39 GMT
and that makes her a nazi?
who are "they"? what do you excatly mean?
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Nov 2009 14:55:28 GMT
of course I go on writing
I do not mind postings like this
discussions are always interesting
but here i simply do not get what should have made the Queen Mother a Nazi
I suppose the idea "Nazi" has a different meaning here.
strange why was your review deleted? I had this as well, but later the reviev was put back online.
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Nov 2009 15:57:10 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Nov 2009 20:28:25 GMT]
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Nov 2009 22:49:28 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Apr 2010 23:20:46 BDT]
In reply to an earlier post on 16 Nov 2009 08:27:54 GMT
all this are point of discussion, but that is not to mix with being a Nazi. Coming from a family having suffered much under the Nazis I take exception if the particualry inhuman views of Nazis are fixed with other views on God knows what.
In reply to an earlier post on 16 Nov 2009 08:29:02 GMT
that is really strange. I always print my reviews or save them on my pc just in case...