4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
The Game Isnt What It Used To Be,
This review is from: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (PS3) (Video Game)
Call of duty modern warfare 3.
Finished the single player in more or less 6 hours. it felt like MW2 with different people and scenary.
(SAME PEOPLE DIFFERENT COSTUMES)
Am not gonna lie i spent a few hours on it trying different things trying to find something to make me go oh wow this is AWSOME but no.The only thing that made me go WOW. was the MOAB(Mother Of All Bombs) it felt good getting it but the journey is painfull. first you have to use the specialist strike package. you dont get "KILLSTREAKS" you get perks after 25kills(well 24 cuz u have all perks which includes hardline) you get the bomb it ticks down and blows up everyone thats not on ur team. similar to MW2's Nuke but it doesnt kill ur teammates...
(NO WOW FACTOR)
The killstreaks are rendered useless most of the time cuz of all the buildings.
so getting all those kills to rain down death with your AC-130 is put to shame by all buildings blocking you.(POOR MAP DESIGN
I also managed to get The Ospery Gunner which is good but people in buildings again..so useless. one thing which is wierd...the AC-130 takes a few rockets to get it down...if u manage to target the OSPERY AIRDROP and shoot at rocket at it before it reaches the target that person gets no Care packages....wat a waste for 17 kills LOL
Also i noticed on black ops the Mic/Voice chat is Crystal Clear. but on MW3 it sounds distorted and autotuned. (POOR DEVELOPMENT)
...the Graphics.(2007) they look outdated.
This game has seriously disappointed me. I basicaly Bought MW2. Thats how i feel.
Plus Side. Lots of people play it so mulitplayer is never boring. To a certain Extent.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 14 Dec 2011 18:41:33 GMT
H. Cowan says:
ok first the single player isnt the big thing in mw3, i liked the campaign 5-6hours it takes to complete, but actually its the SAME people because its a 3 part story all concludes to makarov how was in mw1 mw2 mw3. not in black ops because it was made by a different development team (treyarch) also you have to use the specialist package to get a moab but to get a moab it must be a gun streak which means killstreaks or as they are actually called point streaks dont count. if you cant use ac-130s then use different point streaks like advanced uav, recon drone, ect. the map design is not a problem it just isnt camp friendly it means people cant camp anymore round corners, i think you camped tryed camping but it didnt work so you rage quit, voice chat is the same in blops as it is in mw3, use party chat its the best, autotuned? dude autotunned is something completely different thats were your voice is put to a song and the pitch of your voice is changed. poor development is nothing to do with game chat ALL games with game chat have that quality. The graphics are actually using a updated game engine (2011) made and are bulit on mw2. i admit graphics are not as good as battlefield 3. what do you expect when you buy a game like assassins creed or fable 3 they have the same graphics engines each time, it would take to long to make a new engine it takes years it took EA 8 years to make the frostbite graphics engine and call of duty is realeased every november. by the way i have played this game and thanks to the no camping corners i have a 1.93 kd ratio and a 2.40 win lose with campaign completed on hardened, try surivival mode you dont seem to be to good at this game. :)
In reply to an earlier post on 14 Dec 2011 22:38:54 GMT
Orville Miller says:
Add me on ps3 and ill show you.
For one i dont camp its not my playstyle.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›