Customer Review

26 of 35 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating but Surreal Take of Evolution-Creation Debate, 21 Jun. 2008
This review is from: Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism (Hardcover)
A lot of books have been published about the evolution-creation controversy but this has got to be the most original and, in many ways, most outrageous. Fuller has been always known for his rather perverse take on things and people (esp. Thomas Kuhn, who also comes in for a whipping here) but this tops them all. Fuller is basically arguing that `Science' in the philosophically robust sense of a unified sense of reality (the kind of thing physicists still go on about) requires a belief in the privileged place of humans in the universe. This belief is by no means self-evident but requires a belief that we have some privileged relationship with whomever was responsible for the universe's creation. In this respect, Fuller argues that a belief in `intelligent design' in some broad sense - and he's not afraid to talk about God in this context -- is needed to do science. Once you accept this point, as many philosophers and scientists have, then Darwin's theory of evolution with its strong emphasis on chance-based processes starts to look strange. And I suppose that's really the point of this book, to make Darwin and Darwinism look strange. There are some truly mind-blowing moments here, including a sustained comparison between evolution and astrology in its scientific heyday (about 500 years ago). Fuller also does a good line on nasty remarks, calling modern evolutionary theory `genetically modified Darwinism' and the blog Panda's Thumb, `Darwin's brownshirts'. He even spends time pouring scorn on theistic evolutionsists like Francis Collins and Kenneth Miller, whom he regards as intellectually superficial. Fuller also makes the interesting point that no good science has ever come from atheism, and that one can go on arguing about the merits of evolution and creation without affecting the day-to-day work of science.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 20 Feb 2009 15:04:20 GMT
R. Davies says:
I'm not sure if this is a good review or not but it makes the book sound ridiculously poor and the author a complete idiot.

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Jan 2010 11:20:41 GMT
tex says:
This is an excellent review, the only thing it lacks is a few quotes and examples from the book. It is even easy to think of the great contributors to modern science, from Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and on to Newton, and right up to Gregor Mendel (1850s), to see that all these were Christians, of various denomination, and all believed that if they were unearthing truth then it was to the glory of God. Mendel was first to nail the concept of the 'gene' (you can read an English translation of his paper pub. by Harvard Press, foreword by Mangelsdorf), and he was an Augustinian monk who rose to be abbot of his abbey. Newton wrote more on bible studies and theology than he did on science, and you can read it online now. One or two enlightened ancient Greeks and Islamic scholars had the right idea too, but they all fizzled out as their culture did not support their lone genius sufficiently to achieve critical mass.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

3.3 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
Used & New from: £0.01
Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Location: London, England

Top Reviewer Ranking: 6,040,695