Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Barbourian Hordes, 15 May 2012
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The End of Time. The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe (Hardcover)
Julian Barbour, a well-known maverick at conferences, has managed to present his unorthodox views in a balanced and accessible way in this popular treatment. His singular vision ties together the various themes in a startling manner. The theory therein is exciting, disturbing, and invigorating.

Somehow a rather complex set of ideas incorporating the canonical approach to quantum gravity, the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, and Barbour's novel approach regarding configuration space are presented at a level anyone bothered to put the time in (ho ho) can understand. Generally, Barbour is good at laying out ideas in a simple manner, although he does occasionally transition from carefully explaining everything to quickly reeling off some technical sentence or other, albeit only in a minority of cases. He writes equations out in words, with some loss of technical generality, on the other hand. My main minor criticism of the book is his description of the wavefunction as three coloured 'mists'. Despite my training in QM, I got lost sometimes when trying to remember whether blue represented probability or position and so on.

I think the main reason the book works is because Barbour's theories are themselves usually only describable in qualitative terms anyway, since quite preliminary. I've often thought cutting edge ideas are often easier to explain than well-established ones, since often they only exist in qualitative form. And Barbour has a vision, a breathtaking vision, one that incorporates many themes that are now (2012) even 'hotter' then they were back in 1999, which I think is the original publication date. Barbour's approach to QG is fascinating, even if it should prove false.

One further minor quibble, however, is that the book is called the end of TIME, and Barbour's theory is presented as a theory of time (i.e. there isn't any 'flow,' etc.), yet in reality it is an anti-realist position with regard to MOTION and/or real 'becoming,' NOT 'time' as such. The further independent argument required - that time is reducible to change, motion, etc. - even if plausible, is nowhere satisfactorily provided. The nearest Babrour comes to providing such, in my view, is when he mentions a critique of Ashtekar's views. (It may be objected that Barbour's positive arguments for a 'Machian' approach incorporate a certain denial of absolute and/or real time, but this requires an argument. Since distinctions such as denying A-series, B-series, or C-series time are not addressed, for example).

Incidentally, where Barbour contrasts his MWI with other historical Everettian's, including Everett, an update would be interesting, since the field has moved on so much since 1999, perhaps partly inspired by Barbour's book.

All in all, this is an accessible and brilliant book, containing one of the most interesting unified views on nature, physics and time ever. If you enjoyed Deutsch's Fabric of Reality from the late 90s, you'll probably enjoy this book too. Barbour is careful, perhaps more so than Deutsch, to point out his ideas are unorthodox, in terms of the 'sociology' of physics. However, much as in the case of Deutsch, a sizeable and growing minority of physicists are developing ideas that resemble many of those contained in this book.

I should note that I find Barbour's conception of 'Nows' or 'instants' physically incoherent, but that it took me a long time to work around his many brilliant and subtle arguments contained herein.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 26 May 2012 11:28:52 BDT
malreux says:
Just wanted to add that since writing this review I've been convinced by some comments of Simon Saunders that I was too hasty in my judgement found in the last sentence of the review. Basically, it relates to some worries about 4D covariant QFT - however, I'm now convinced I was too hasty and hadn't understood Barbour's motivation. Barbour is looking to some as yet unspecified canonical approach to QG, and has very interesting ideas re what he calls the 'deep structure of GR'. I now recant the final sentence of my review.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›