Customer Review

44 of 64 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars If you believe in sacrificing your first born to the climate gods this book isn't for you, 16 Feb 2012
This review is from: Watermelons: How Environmentalists are Killing the Planet, Destroying the Economy and Stealing Your Children's Future (Paperback)
This book is well written, fast paced and well researched. Don't listen to the idiots who will attack anything that doesn't support their religion of Man Made Climate Change.

If you're a fully registered nutjob to the climate change cult then nothing is likely to change your mind. This book is for people who don't believe everything they're told by politicians and the "scientists" the politicians pay.

All is explained inside!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 3 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-6 of 6 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 16 Feb 2012 11:29:16 GMT
Martin Lack says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 18 Feb 2012 13:18:57 GMT
Martin Lack says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 18 Feb 2012 15:22:42 GMT
Jim Quinnel says:
Again potentially libelous but typical of you.

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Jan 2014 17:29:02 GMT
PsychoPigeon says:
haha, I always laugh when the left use the big oil conspiracy theory to dismiss any criticisms of their whack job theories.

In reply to an earlier post on 25 Jan 2014 12:39:52 GMT
Martin Lack says:
Two problems with that analysis:
1. My not being left-wing falsifies the Watermelon conspiracy theory.
2. Industry-funded denial of inconvenient science is conspiracy fact.

Posted on 4 Jun 2014 10:49:12 BDT
Iain S says:
Well researched? The author makes no attempt to understand science at all, and says he 'doesn't need to'. The only thing he researches is digging up dirt for ad homin attacks, which are the basis of all his arguments.

Does the author prove that CO2 does not absorb infra-red radiation? No
Does he prove that man's activities haven't caused the 40% increase in atmospheric CO2? No

Given the above two facts, the sceptics had better come up with a bulletproof explanation of how our climate works before anyone could conclude it's safe to keep adding more CO2. They don't do this though, they just make ad homin snipes at climate scientists, and perpetuate the usual myths.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›