28 of 29 people found the following review helpful
Make sure it's Kate!,
This review is from: Emma [DVD] (DVD)
Jane Austen's stories have always been a rich source of material for both film makers and those who produce period drama for television and these productions have varied, of course in quality. So what makes one production of the same story better than another? We all have our own opinions on this but I ask that firstly, the story 'sticks to' the original book and that secondly, the characters are well cast and believable - that they reproduce the people Jane Austen invented. I could talk about many other things that make a production exceptional - details of the period, ambiance and so on but those first two are the most important to me.
The most successful production of Emma - with no exception - is the one starring Kate Beckinsale. She portrays Jane's Emma to perfection; in fact she IS Emma! Not a giggly airhead (as depicted on a more recent television serial) but a privileged young woman who is kind-hearted and caring but impetuous and rather too self-confident. Space cannot allow me to praise each actor, separately here because everyone's performance was so good but it would be wrong to not mention Mark Strong as a totally believable Mr Knightly and Samantha Morton as the pretty and indecisive Harriet. Of course, it would be impossible to avoid mentioning such a gifted actress as Prunella Scales (whatever part she undertakes); what a wonderful performance as the garrulous Miss Bates!
Disregard all other productions of Emma. Let Kate Beckinsale transport you to Jane Austen's world!
Tracked by 1 customer
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 24 Jan 2012 18:36:31 GMT
Mary Kruger says:
We must agree to disagree. Beckinsale's performance did not impress me as "kind hearted", and my husband, when she convinced Harriet not to marry Mr. Martin, even declared, "What a b!+ch! She's horrible!" The acting generally is quite good, I agree, but Miss Beckinsale portrayal is too worldly to be sympathetic. I like the Emma in the book (and in the 2009 production, and even, in spite of the movie's other horrors, in the Paltrow movie) because she is so clueless (as "airheaded", as you say) about how her actions affect others. I agree that the production is generally "true" to the novel, as you define fidelity, but an enlightened Emma is just a manipulative... well, what my husband said.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›