Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop Cyber Monday Deals Week in Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Amazon Fire TV Shop now DIYED Shop now Shop Fire Kids Edition Shop Kindle Voyage Listen in Prime Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

25 of 27 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars It works, but it needs _very_ careful set-up in my experience. Failed after 2yrs., 13 April 2011
This review is from: Cisco-Linksys Maximum Performance E4200 Dual-Band N Router (Accessory)
Given the generous amount of antennae within the e4200, I bought this expecting a significant improvement in 5.0GHz network coverage around my home and in my garden, compared to my Apple Airport Extreme (also a simultaneous dual-band router).

After experimenting a lot with physical location, orientation, network settings and so on, it seems to offer no/little improvement (have checked this with three different computers in several different locations). Its settings are more flexible than the Airport Extreme, which is nice, but in the real world this does not offer much (if anything).

Also, to confirm what one review (elsewhere) has said (but which others have stated incorrectly), it is not readily wall-mountable, though with a spot of velcro I have managed this. Yes, the e4200 is actually light enough to stay up and in position with velcro on the ceiling! Not what Linksys intended, I am sure, but is nonetheless an advantage over the heavier Apple Airport Extreme.

Therefore, my conclusion is that this is a perfectly good simultaneous dual-band router for someone looking for their first such device, though there are cheaper models in the Linksys range that accomplish the same thing.
For those already using a simultaneous dual-band router, it offers no/little noticeable improvement....not to me, anyway. My advice: save your money.

** UPDATE on APRIL 16th 2011 ** After a considerable amount of further experimentation with orientation, location and height above the ground (more than is sensible or practical for most people), I am now achieving what could be termed 'maximum performance'. My connection is about 30% faster than the Airport Extreme allowed. Have increased my rating by a star. My advice now: yes it is a very fast router but I suspect that most people will not see the benefit from it. It does reward the user with state-of-the-art performance if they're prepared to put a lot of time into experimenting with physical set-up.

** UPDATE on July 25th 2013 ** After getting intermittent hangs and freezes, the unit has completely died. Tried resetting it and reloading my settings. Worked once but even resetting now makes no difference. Not good enough. Back to Apple Airport Extreme for me. Am fed up of failing routers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-4 of 4 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 10 Jul 2011 17:14:51 BDT
Last edited by the author on 10 Jul 2011 17:15:40 BDT
Waz H says:
Your feedback is greatly appreciated, Ive been considering the RV220W for a while now as im looking looking for a 'Quality' Wireless router, and although the wireless component is mainly used for simple web browsing and email recovery on a couple of laptops, the main reason this router stands out for me other than the brand and pedigree, is the 686.8MB Lan/Wan throughput rate, which is an essential element for me as i do a lot of online gaming via my XBOX 360 which is hard wired.

Thanks for your feedback.

In reply to an earlier post on 10 Jul 2011 17:53:01 BDT
keribillen says:
Hi, I would think that the e4200 is more than ample (probably overkill) for a hard-wired XBox 360. For online gaming via such a set-up, your broadband connection is more-than-likely to be the bottleneck.

Best regards,

Posted on 18 Jul 2011 11:08:56 BDT
me again says:
Can you expand on what you did to achieve the update comments April 16th please,thinking of purchasing this so any more info would be benificial. Thanks.

In reply to an earlier post on 18 Jul 2011 13:07:28 BDT
keribillen says:
I did two things:
1) Elevated the router as high as I could.
2) Put it onto a shelf that I could vary the angle of. I found in my set-up that having it facing downwards (so not horizontal) about 40 degrees speeded up the connection.

So, you could try doing the same but I suspect that the positioning that works for me will not be the best for you, because the performance will depend somewhat on the positioning and orientation of your computer.

Good luck!
‹ Previous 1 Next ›