Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

18 of 22 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Good in parts, 19 Jan. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: And Sons (Kindle Edition)
A.N. Dyer is seventy-nine-years-old. As a young man he wrote a novel, I think it would be called a coming of age novel, called Ampersand. It became something of a classic in American literature, vying with Catcher in the Rye as the must-read novel for older teenagers. Dyer went on to write several other novels, though I don't think they achieved quite the cult status of Ampersand. By the time this story starts he has written nothing for several years and he is almost a recluse.

The story is narrated by Philip Topping, the son of Dyer's oldest friend, Charlie Topping. And it begins with Charlie's funeral at which Dyer is to give the eulogy. He arrives at the church with his youngest son, Andy, a seventeen-year-old boy who, we are told, was the result of a brief affair his father had with a Swedish au-pair girl. Dyer also has two much older sons, Richard and Jamie, but they are not at the funeral. Dyer sits in the front pew waiting for the ordeal of having to address the large congregation, but all he can worry about is the fact that Andy does not seem to be in the church. That is because Andy is waiting on the church steps for a twenty-four-year old girl with whom he has been conversing on the internet and whom he has arranged to meet outside the church. It is his profound wish that he will lose his virginity with the girl.

Andy's girl is late. He doesn't make it into the church. His father is desperately concerned. The eulogy is not what one might call a success, though as Dyer leaves the church he is still faced with a great many people who are eager to get him to sign their copies of Ampersand.

As I say, Andy is the youngest of the sons in the title of the novel. Richard was for many years a hopeless drug addict. But he is reformed. He devotes his life to counselling other drug addicts in California. He is married to another former drug addict and they have two children, Emmett and Chloe. Emmett is sixteen and plays an amusing part in the story later on. Richard has had no contact with his father for years. His children have never met their grandfather. Jamie is not married. He has devoted his life to filming death and poverty around the world, though he does not bother to sell the films. They just mount up in cardboard boxes. He never descended to the depths Richard plumbed but, unlike his brother, he still takes recreational drugs, despite his age.

Those are the sons. The Dyers are among America's elite. They are East Coast WASPS. Their world is a strange one, to most of us, populated by other famous and rich people. But, as you will have seen, they are a thoroughly dysfunctional family.

Dyer senior and Topping senior went to the same expensive school (the setting for Ampersand). Their sons also went there. Andy is still there at the time the story is set.

The novel begins relatively well. It looks as though it is going to be a realistic novel in the tradition of some of the great nineteenth century English novelists (who are mentioned rather too often). I, for one, was prepared to go along with Gilbert's theory that almost all WASPs are either rather obnoxious druggies or just plain stupid. But any claim to realism is lost, about half way through the book, when we come to what might be called the "Great Revelation". I shan't tell you what that revelation is. It is enough to say that it instantly moves the story into grotesque fantasy. As soon as we read it we understand that we are no longer reading believable fiction.

I am told that many American reviewers have given the book that coveted title "The Great American Novel", though not all are agreed on that (what I have called the Great Revelation has not been universally admired). The novel does have faults. To start with, it is far too long. It is, at times, horribly pretentious. There are long passages in which the author seems to be saying "look how clever I am, I can write about great works of art and great writers of the past and I can churn out frightfully high class prose effortlessly". Indeed, in one scene, where Dyer is being shown original manuscripts of Jane Austen, Charles Dickens and Anthony Trollope, the intelligent reader will instantly think that what he is reading now is nowhere near as good as what those authors produced. They set out to entertain their readers, not to prove how superior they were. Sadly, Gilbert, though a very good writer, is plainly much more concerned to prove his own superiority than to give pleasure to readers (other than to those who want to boast they have been reading a "literary" novel).

The word is that Gilbert hopes his novel will win the Booker prize. If that happens it will say more about the lack of competition than about the worth of & Sons. He might, more realistically, stand a chance of winning the Literary Review's Bad Sex award. There are three or four sex scenes. The first is handled quite well. The others are just plain disgusting.

But I must not be too negative. There are some really wonderful passages in this book. Just as one is thinking of discarding it for ever, of throwing it in the fire because of some awful pretentious garbage, one comes across a gem of brilliant writing and insight. And it is often very funny. We do not feel much sympathy for the characters (I would exempt Philip, Emmett and Andy from that criticism), but they are well drawn. There are some excellent set pieces (the party in the Frick is beautifully and wittily described). And the end, when you finally get to it, is worth waiting for. Gilbert is, quite obviously, an exceptionally talented writer. But he does need a good editor with the courage to tell him to remove many thousands of unnecessary words and to cut down on the showing off.

My own theory is that good writers like Gilbert are being let down by the invention (in the latter half of the twentieth century) of a new genre of fiction called "literary". Too many publishers are eager to claim their products are literary, rather than just a good read. And clever authors are being encouraged to produce work which ought really to be found in Private Eye's Pseuds Corner rather than in readable novels.

I do not say you shouldn't buy and read this book. You will find some wonderful stuff within its covers, even if you are slightly disappointed by the dross. And, so long as he becomes less self-indulgent, Gilbert will, I am sure, be a great novelist one day.

POST SCRIPT: I wrote this review a while ago. I then thought I ought not to post it, because it was so negative about a book which had apparently been acclaimed by the critics as a masterpiece. Then I heard the book being discussed on the BBC's Saturday Review programme. Pretty well all my own complaints about the novel were made by the reviewers on that programme. It seems, though the consensus amongst critics in America is that Gilbert has produced the book of the decade, that English critics have not been won over. Anyway, I am now brave enough to post this review.

Charles
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 11 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 20 Jan 2014 09:50:29 GMT
lovemurakami says:
I don't usually comment on other people's reviews as I appreciate the time taken to read and review a book. However, I feel I must say something about your review of & Sons. I am pleased you point out that there are some wonderful passages in the book, however your suggestion that in parts there is some "pretentious garbage" and it is "self indulgent". Surely Gilbert has written this novel as a comment upon the shallowness of American society (and society in general) and the culture of celebrity.

What I would say to other readers is read this novel and it isn't a chore to read, it is a joy, it isn't "horribly pretentious", really I could turn your argument on yourself and say that your review is "pretentious and self indulgent" to quote yourself.

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2014 17:43:55 GMT
elmsyrup says:
I don't find your comment very helpful because you seem to be denying CE Utley's right to hold a different opinion than you.

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2014 18:50:18 GMT
lovemurakami says:
Unfortunately the review seemed very pretentious and overly long, if he doesn't like the book, that's fine, just don't call something garbage and self indulgent and then produce a self indulgent review.

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2014 20:52:48 GMT
Last edited by the author on 20 Jan 2014 20:54:25 GMT
C. E. Utley says:
Of course, people will disagree about this book. I don't think it is too far fetched to say it is an "important" novel. Though, as you (Love Murakami) will have spotted, I, and many more highly qualified critics than I am, are not convinced that it is "great".

I am surprised you accuse me of pretension. If I had been required to bet I would have thought the champions of & Sons would have said I was just impertinent, cheeky and stupid (for failing to spot the brilliance of Mr Gilbert).

But the real point to be made is that there is room for disagreement about novels like this one. You loved it, I thought it was not all it has been cracked up to be. Funnily enough, if it hadn't had all that hype from America, I might not have been so cruel about it.

And, by the way, I bought the book because I had read your review, which struck me as not being the standard "this is the greatest book ever written" (probably full of spelling errors) which Amazon is packed with.

Charles

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2014 20:56:58 GMT
C. E. Utley says:
Love Murakami, I did wonder whether long reviews might be frowned upon on Amazon. I will try to be shorter next time (though I did think Gilbert deserved more than just "I didn't like it").

Charles

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2014 20:59:26 GMT
C. E. Utley says:
Elmsyrup, thank you very much for standing up for me.

Charles

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Jan 2014 20:32:09 GMT
lovemurakami says:
Hi, I am really pleased that you read it because of my review and am sorry you didn't love it as much as I did. It was my discovery of early last year, I was lucky enough to get an e-proof. What I love about reading is the fact that everyone has a different 'take' on a novel, and even if it doesn't work for us it makes us think and debate. I am sure that Amazon don't frown upon long reviews and as I said in my first comment, I always appreciate reviewers work as not only do people invest their time in reading a book but then take more time in mulling over it and writing a review. By the way I am a bit of a sucker for modern American fiction.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Jan 2014 23:02:12 GMT
C. E. Utley says:
My review may have been negative, but I am pleased I read the book. I have done a little more research. A lot of the British critics agree with you and disagree with me. The Observer was on my side, but most others were on yours. It was interesting, and in a way surprising, that the BBC found three critics who were not keen on the book. Although, to be fair, one of them did say he liked it, just that it was a notch or two below great.

I shall look out for your reviews in the future (does that "Vine" thing mean you get books early?).

Charles

In reply to an earlier post on 22 Jan 2014 20:31:12 GMT
lovemurakami says:
Yes, Amazon offer me and others the chance to review proof copies of particular novels. I also signed up to a site to get early e-proofs, which is where I got offered & Sons to read, and as you can see, I loved every moment of it. Enjoy your next read.

Posted on 6 Jul 2014 06:50:51 BDT
Last edited by the author on 6 Jul 2014 06:56:00 BDT
MJF says:
TOO MUCH INFO, CHARLES!
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details