Customer Review

12 of 17 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Retelling the social, 5 Jun 2011
This review is from: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies) (Paperback)
This is a quite readable book in the context of its topic area. It is not a book I personally like although I think it is widely read.

The key problem of the book is its tendency to largely ignore swathes of existing mainstream sociology (particularly American). Many of the gaps or problematizations Bruno identifies with our orthodoxy are questionable given my (more sympathetic) reading of the mainstream sociology. Some of the claims he makes to justify his ANT approach are simply false. Consequently, I would recommend PhD students not to read ANT extensively as a basis for their understanding of the field -- lest they reinvent the wheel. Rather, ANT can be a source of inspiration (particularly the empirical stories). ANT is not sufficient due to its inability to build knowledge that accumulates over existing knowledge, unless you work in some weird academic context enamoured by ANT and largely ignorant of the 'lamestream scholarship'.

Many of Bruno's insights, I feel personally, are just rhetoric tricks where the old is said in a new way. Of course the new way of saying things 'reveals' or 'highlights' aspects we might otherwise miss but from a more analytical perspective the insights tend to often be not much else but footnotes to the existing understanding. Well, in all honestly there are not many scholars who can do even that. He bravely seeks to reinvent a field. It is an impossible project, which I guess we should admire.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 31 Oct 2013 21:08:47 GMT
K. Andreasen says:
I am curious as to which studies in mainstream sociology you are refering to. I am currently (re)reading this book, and it certainly strikes me as a frontal attack on much of the sociology I have been taught, though that is mostly of the continental kind.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Top Reviewer Ranking: 3,088,349