4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Seeks to redefine photography,
This review is from: Why It Does Not Have To Be In Focus: Modern Photography Explained (Paperback)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
Flicking through the book an initial reaction might be: If I had taken that, it would have ended up in the bin. The book's subtitle is "modern photography explained" - and seeks to justify why the photos have deliberately defied the "rules" - everything you have been told about how to take a good photo seems to be overturned. Blurry, over- and under exposed, wonkily composed, some are literally photos of nothing at all.
Many will have heard the names Henri Cartier-Bresson, Nan Goldin, Cindy Sherman and Gillian Wearing. Others are unfamiliar to me, like Francesca Woodman who tragically committed suicide at the age of 22.
There is a double page spread for each photo, discussing how and why it was taken, with information about the photographer. Some are weird, surreal, and some are surely posturing, pretentious? Waiting for someone to point out the Emperor is not wearing any clothes?
P.53 - a photo of a light bulb! The comment is "this image could be interpreted as an amateur, almost accidental, snapshot of a ceiling." Hm. P 65 another photo which suggests a "family holiday snapshot" but it has paint smeared across it.
But there is exciting, challenging stuff, a bouquet of flowers captured in the moment of exploding, there is restaging of Old Masters and surreal fantasy scenes.
Perhaps Alex Prager, whose enigmatic photo Deborah is on page 147, sums it up: "It's not photography... they should come up with another word for what the young generation of photographers are doing." Andreas Gursky, famous for his oversized photos of supermarkets, agrees. "A fixed definition of the term "photography" has become impossible."