Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop Clothing clo_fly_aw15_NA_shoes Shop All Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Shop Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Paperwhite Shop now Shop Now Shop now
Customer Review

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Flawed conspiracy theory, 9 Aug. 2013
This review is from: Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank? (Paperback)
The author's theory is intriguing, if unlikely. However, Mr. Gardiner loses credibility in his ignorance of detail. For example, ships do not have nameplates screwed to the hull. The letters of the ships name are individual castings riveted to the hull, rather less easy to remove than the author suggests (though not of course impossible). The implication that the scam was concocted as a result of White Star losing it's appeal regarding the Hawke collision is of course nonsense. The appeal went against White Star in April 1913, a year after the Titanic had sunk, and the House of Lords judgement was in November 1914. Hardly possible for E.J.Smith to have been encouraging White Star to pursue the matter from beyond his watery grave. The book is an enjoyable piece of hokum, but I am afraid that the likelihood of there being any truth in it is slim indeed. Too many people would have known what had happened for nothing to have come out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 25 Jul 2015 12:08:09 BDT
Last edited by the author on 25 Jul 2015 12:30:57 BDT
P. G. Croft says:
It's a THEORY--based on the evidence found, some questionable, other's not explained to my satisfaction. It's those, no matter how few, that leave the door open to warrant this books credibility. The people behind the scenes had so much wealth, power, and influence in the right places--and that ilk still does, that I can quite believe this to be true. I wait for further evidence. You display great naivety to think that ' Too many many people would have known what had happened ---'' to be able to suppress their evidence-- really? Given the age they lived in, where subservience was the norm, with threats and fear of the hire em fire em regime that prevailed. All the Main daily newspaper's were owned by Barons, who had strong links to the higher echelons of society, and who towed the government line. (evidenced in WW1 ). Evidence of this has been written in other books on the subject. Also, the crew was confined against their will ( probably illegally) coached what to say and not to say, or to keep their mouths shut altogether.etc etc. For cover-ups--look no further than 9/11. P G Croft.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details