Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

18 of 24 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Shoahbusiness, 17 Jun. 2012
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (Paperback)
This book has attracted mostly positive reviews and comments here - some of them get it right.

Finkelstein argues that before 1967, the holocaust did not feature as salient fact of American-Jewish life. The Six-Day war that same year changed this: the holocaust became a weapon in an ideological war to legitimise Israel's treatment of its conquered Palestinian population, and American complicity in this. From this, the `holocaust industry' emerged.

What is the holocaust industry? Finkelstein does not offer any systematic definition. He appears to be using this term as shorthand for a collection of ideological tropes and attitudes deployed by American-Jewish interest groups for political purposes. The lack of systematic definition of this term however does not vitiate this book as a serious work of criticism. The reason for this is because the bulk of the book is devoted to documenting the political misuse of the holocaust for cynical political purposes.

The showpiece of the book is the so-called `double shakedown' of Swiss banks and German firms in the 1990s and early 2000s. In the Swiss case, American-Jewish leaders of the World Jewish Congress and other organisations extorted substantial reparations on a false pretext that the country's banks looted the accounts of Jewish survivors and victims. In the German case, the shakedown assumed the form of blackmailing German businesses into making further reparations for their participation in Nazi crimes, despite Germany already having paid substantial compensation to holocaust survivors. What's more, having extracted these monies by threat (e.g. the threat of US sanctions), the real survivors of the holocaust barely received anything. Hence the double shakedown: of Swiss banks and German firms on the one hand, and of holocaust survivors on the other.

In two later editions of this book, Dr. Finkelstein devotes considerable space to expanding and defending his findings. I do not know of any critic that has actually taken issue with the substance of his findings, let alone actually rebut or falsify them.

The broader purposes of the holocaust industry are by now widely accepted: to sanctify the state of Israel and render it immune to criticism, and to taint any criticism of the conduct of the Israeli state with the stigma of anti-Semitism.

One can take issue with individual statements he makes. As Finkelstein's style is polemical, occasionally shrill, he is wont to make the odd sweeping statement. He compares Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to American Jewish treatment of African-Americans, polemical flourishes which are clearly meant to provoke tempers rather than reasoned debate. However, it would be cheap to poke holes in his argument by seizing and faulting individual statements while ignoring his principal contentions, where the substance of his argument is made, and for which he supports with meticulous referencing. As I have already said, the contentions he makes on the chapter of the double shakedown have never, to my knowledge, been addressed by his critics, let alone falsified.

One criticism I have of the book is that the notion of a holocaust `industry' is not well developed, as I have already intimated - is it a conspiracy, a bundle of attitudes, an industry in the literal sense of a conscious manufacturing of myth or what? But again, this weakness does not detract from the central contentions he makes. It is not necessary to prove that there is a centralised conspiracy, only that interest groups use the holocaust in an entirely cynical way in which he describes and documents. For this reason, to compare this book to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, as one of Finkelstein's critics did, is utterly contemptible. It is a fact that the Nazi holocaust happened. The Jewish people of occupied Nazi Europe suffered immensely - `colossal suffering' as Finkelstein puts it. But it does not follow from this fact that everything Israel says and does, or that everything Jewish individuals say and do, is automatically vindicated and rendered immune to any criticism whatsoever.

Despite the calumnies laid against him, this is NOT a work of holocaust denial. Numerous members of his family perished in the holocaust. Both of his parents survived the camps. His central findings in relation to the double shakedown of Swiss banks were replicated independently by no less than Raul Hilberg, the doyen of holocaust historians. He does not take issue with serious holocaust scholars like Raul Hilberg and Henry Friedlander (whose works he references in this book). His outrage is against those who exploit the fact of the colossal suffering of the Jewish people during the Second World War for wholly unrelated contemporary political ends.

If the holocaust is to be properly studied, and it historical justice is to be done to its victims, then attempts to hijack it to promote contemporary political and ideological interests must be emphatically rejected. Any reasonable person can agree that to exploit the dead in order to harm the interests of the living deserves contempt. That, fundamentally, is what this book is about.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 19 Jan 2015 15:33:11 GMT
Erroll says:
You opine that:

"It is a fact that the Nazi holocaust happened. The Jewish people of occupied Nazi Europe suffered immensely ..."

That second sentence is certainly accurate. But the first sentence is highly problematic because one has to wonder, if the Jewish Holocaust happened, why governments in 17 countries [including, of course, Israel] see fit to throw people in jail if they dare to point out that there is no evidence which shows that Hitler signed a written order to exterminate Jews, no evidence that the Germans deliberately murdered six million Jews, and that there is certainly no evidence which can back up the claim that millions of Jews, or anybody else for that matter, died in homicidal gas chambers. And yet revisionists have been imprisoned in many European countries for writing books and giving talks which contest that alleged fact, not in fascist countries, which is what one would expect, but, astonishingly, in countries which claim to be democratic.

"A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing."-George Orwell

"Intellectual freedom is the right of every individual to both seek and receive information from all points of view without restriction."-American Library Association

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Jan 2015 21:12:50 GMT
F Henwood says:
Bravo. What wisdom.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›