Customer Review

9 of 38 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM, 25 April 2007
This review is from: Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe (Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute) (Paperback)
INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM

This book is an excellent example of "Chariots of the Gods" and other speculations about the presence and/or influence of ETs in the history and developments of our planet -- except for the fact it clearly contains statements that squarely put it in the realm of Biblical Creationism. Not I, but a pro-ID Creationist reviewer (A Review of Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe By Zach Stearns June 27, 2005) states:

"Finally, a short essay penned by both Meyer and Dembski concludes the compilation; this piece simply argues that the Christian doctrine of divine Creation may be the most causally adequate explanation of the Big Bang. It is not proving that the Big Bang implies a supernatural creator, as some critics suggest; the authors merely assert that it is the best explanation given the knowledge we have and the opposing, naturalist possibilities."

However they try to disguise it, IDC is not science but the efforts of individuals with questionable motives to sustain the ancient fables-based concept that superior, extraterrestrial intelligence(s) were responsible for our existence and the existence of the entire Cosmos.

Heraclitus of Ephesus refuted them some 2600 years ago when he wrote that the Cosmos was created by no man or god but it forever was, is now, and forever will be an "Everliving Fire".

Which is also what the late great Carl Sagan expressed when he wrote:

"The Cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be."

It is a process through which all things flow and evolve, are constantly formed and transformed, from clusters of galactic superclusters to planets and molecules, as well as intelligent beings which do not create, but are created by the process.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 5 Jun 2008 17:04:13 BDT
D. M. Ohara says:
"Heraclitus of Ephesus refuted them some 2600 years ago when he wrote that the Cosmos was created by no man or god but it forever was, is now, and forever will be an "Everliving Fire". "

'Cosmogenes' may not know the meaning of the word 'refute': it means 'to demonstrate the falsehood of', and not, as in some popular misunderstandings, simply 'deny' or even 'deny vehemently'.

And has not Edwin Hubble, among others, in the meantime really and truly refuted Heraclitus's assertion - which was never more than an assumption, because no sound arguments or evidence were ever advanced in its support?
Or perhaps 'Cosmogenes' simply takes it on trust that the ancient Greeks were better informed on such matters?
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: New Mexico

Top Reviewer Ranking: 6,046,898