5 of 44 people found the following review helpful
Doctor Who The Monsters Collection - The Silurians,
This review is from: Doctor Who - The Monsters Collection: The Silurians [DVD] (DVD)
Doctor Who and the Silurians: The Doctor and UNIT are called in when a research centre experiences problems.
Part 1: UNIT is summoned to Wenley Moor research station which is experiencing power losses.
Part 2: Investigating the caves, the Doctor is attacked by a dinosaur-like creature.
Part 3: The creature from the caves, wounded and dangerous, is on the loose on Wenley Moor.
Part 4: The Doctor attempts to make peace between the humans and Silurians.
Part 5: The Silurians infect Major Baker with a virus and release him to spread the infection.
Part 6: As the Silurian plague quickly spreads, the Doctor desperately searches for a cure.
Part 7: The Silurians intend to destroy Earth's protective Van Allen Belt, destroying mankind.
31 Jan - 14 Mar 1970
Warriors of the Deep: The Silurians and Sea Devils are provoking a war to leave them sole heirs to the planet...
Part 1: Seabase 4 is on alert as a strange craft approaches.
Part 2: The Silurians and Sea Devils send in the Myrka to spearhead their invasion.
Part 3: Vorshak's crew are cut down one by one by Sauvix's Sea Devil Warriors.
Part 4: War is avoided but lives are lost; the Doctor reflects there should have been another way.
05 - 13 Jan 1984
Tracked by 2 customers
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 11 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 29 Apr 2013 17:42:44 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 12 May 2013 07:23:01 BDT]
Posted on 10 May 2013 03:55:04 BDT
Philip Quinton says:
This isn't a review, it's daft and pointless speculation.
Posted on 10 May 2013 14:37:07 BDT
Mr S. Anderson says:
Amazon really have take some action with this "reviewer".
What about customers just getting into Dr Who,and i imagine there will be quite a few with the 50th anniversary media hype,pre-ordering these sets on the assumption that it contains all these stories.
I truly hope in the meantime that they have some extra time to double check these comments before they are duped into pre-ordering.
In reply to an earlier post on 10 May 2013 20:45:17 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 11 May 2013 08:48:16 BDT]
In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:37:05 BDT
I. Mcdougall says:
I reported all of his reviews as inappropriate, but they're still here. What criteria does Amazon use when it decides what, or what not to take down?
In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 21:39:05 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 25 May 2013 16:19:14 BDT]
Posted on 5 Jun 2013 16:22:39 BDT
The EYE OF HORUS Editor says:
TO ITERATE THE OTHER COMMENTS - "All of his reviews as inappropriate, but they're still here. This isn't a review, it's daft and pointless speculation. Must be unemployed and nothing better to do with his/her life. Sad. What criteria does Amazon use when it decides what, or what not to take down?"
In reply to an earlier post on 5 Jun 2013 18:17:51 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 6 Jun 2013 00:40:21 BDT]
Posted on 10 Jun 2013 01:33:02 BDT
In reply to an earlier post on 10 Jun 2013 20:15:38 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 10 Jun 2013 22:07:18 BDT]