Customer Review

5 of 44 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Doctor Who The Monsters Collection - The Silurians, 27 April 2013
By 
This review is from: Doctor Who - The Monsters Collection: The Silurians [DVD] (DVD)
Doctor Who and the Silurians: The Doctor and UNIT are called in when a research centre experiences problems.

Part 1: UNIT is summoned to Wenley Moor research station which is experiencing power losses.
Part 2: Investigating the caves, the Doctor is attacked by a dinosaur-like creature.
Part 3: The creature from the caves, wounded and dangerous, is on the loose on Wenley Moor.
Part 4: The Doctor attempts to make peace between the humans and Silurians.
Part 5: The Silurians infect Major Baker with a virus and release him to spread the infection.
Part 6: As the Silurian plague quickly spreads, the Doctor desperately searches for a cure.
Part 7: The Silurians intend to destroy Earth's protective Van Allen Belt, destroying mankind.

31 Jan - 14 Mar 1970

Warriors of the Deep: The Silurians and Sea Devils are provoking a war to leave them sole heirs to the planet...

Part 1: Seabase 4 is on alert as a strange craft approaches.
Part 2: The Silurians and Sea Devils send in the Myrka to spearhead their invasion.
Part 3: Vorshak's crew are cut down one by one by Sauvix's Sea Devil Warriors.
Part 4: War is avoided but lives are lost; the Doctor reflects there should have been another way.

05 - 13 Jan 1984
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 2 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 11 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 29 Apr 2013 17:42:44 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 12 May 2013 07:23:01 BDT]

Posted on 10 May 2013 03:55:04 BDT
This isn't a review, it's daft and pointless speculation.

Posted on 10 May 2013 14:37:07 BDT
Amazon really have take some action with this "reviewer".
What about customers just getting into Dr Who,and i imagine there will be quite a few with the 50th anniversary media hype,pre-ordering these sets on the assumption that it contains all these stories.
I truly hope in the meantime that they have some extra time to double check these comments before they are duped into pre-ordering.

In reply to an earlier post on 10 May 2013 20:45:17 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 11 May 2013 08:48:16 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:37:05 BDT
I. Mcdougall says:
I reported all of his reviews as inappropriate, but they're still here. What criteria does Amazon use when it decides what, or what not to take down?

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 21:39:05 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 25 May 2013 16:19:14 BDT]

Posted on 5 Jun 2013 16:22:39 BDT
TO ITERATE THE OTHER COMMENTS - "All of his reviews as inappropriate, but they're still here. This isn't a review, it's daft and pointless speculation. Must be unemployed and nothing better to do with his/her life. Sad. What criteria does Amazon use when it decides what, or what not to take down?"

In reply to an earlier post on 5 Jun 2013 18:17:51 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 6 Jun 2013 00:40:21 BDT]

Posted on 10 Jun 2013 01:33:02 BDT
STB says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 10 Jun 2013 20:15:38 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 10 Jun 2013 22:07:18 BDT]
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details

Item

4.0 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
£9.99 £6.86
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Top Reviewer Ranking: 5,914,366