15 of 18 people found the following review helpful
A clingfilm-thin follow-up to a previous worthwhile book.,
This review is from: Beyond the Limit (Hardcover)
Prof Sid should be worth a read. He has seen more of the action and characters of F1, closer up, than anyone - even Murray Walker or B. Ecclestone. ...
The book consists of a hotchpotch of anecdotes presumably assembled from the ones left on his editor's floor from the previous book, many of which are banal, weak and lacking any connection with F1. This last point would not matter if the stories were pithy, witty and interesting: few are.
A pointless, skimpy and garbled re-hash of the 2000 season is trotted out to fill out the mid-section and the book ends with appendices of tables of extremely erudite but arcane statistics on injuries, construction materials, design specs and other matters vital to the FIA Medical and Technical Committees but of no interest to anyone else - not even Grand Prix drivers, I suspect - least of all Eddie Irvine ...
Prof Sid is a self-deprecating fellow. The result of the modesty of his narrative is that on many occasions you feel he's apologising for being present at the events and with the characters involved: consequently, descriptions are thin, lack colour and tend either to drift to vague, aimless conclusions or just stop dead, leaving the reader suspended, waiting for a point that will never be made.
By all means buy this book for a journey, swallow it whole at one sitting for the occasional insight or humorous anecdote expressed by an evidently charming man, then leave it on the plane without a second thought, as I did. One day we will have the full autobiography of Prof Sid, hopefully guided by a writer such as Alan Henry, Nigel Roebuck or David Tremayne. Unlike this one, that book will be worth keeping.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-3 of 3 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 14 Sep 2012 00:41:12 BDT
G. Slevin says:
You should be ashamed of yourself writing such a negative and biased review.
In reply to an earlier post on 15 Sep 2012 23:07:04 BDT
C. Nation says:
Clearly you fail to understand the nature of reviews in general and this one in particular.
I take only the merit of the writing into account. That Prof Sid is a charming fellow is evident and l make this point. But that does not make his book a good one. Prof Sid is many admirable things but a good writer is not one of them.
If you are of the opinion that an unfavourable review of a book by someone you admire is something to be "ashamed" of, you have a deal of growing up still to do.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›