Customer Reviews


5 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Good-natured debate
This book helped me to reach a decision - both sides of the argument are well-presented but overall, this has given me the confidence to vote 'Yes', as a matter of principle. After that, the real debate can commence; without that, there is nothing.
Published 2 months ago by Georgie F

versus
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Where are the Reasons?
I was looking forward to reading this book from two well known and informed commentators. It starts with the Yes arguement from Mr Kerevan and is well written and puts that side of the question well. So far so good. Then in the second part, Mr Cochrane simply repeats all the usual stuff we've heard already with the usual lack of balance or indeed any sign of good reasons...
Published 2 months ago by SB


Most Helpful First | Newest First

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Good-natured debate, 12 May 2014
This book helped me to reach a decision - both sides of the argument are well-presented but overall, this has given me the confidence to vote 'Yes', as a matter of principle. After that, the real debate can commence; without that, there is nothing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Yes and No, 22 April 2014
By 
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Scottish Independence: Yes or No (The Great Debate) (Kindle Edition)
A book of two halves. George Kerevan's pro-independence arguments are well presented and backed up by statistics, facts and footnotes. If anything, there were rather too many statistics but it was a full argument that covered all the main issues. Top marks.

The No argument from Alan Cochrane was, however, very disappointing. It began with rallying cries of shared history, the 2012 Olympics, the Union Jack and the Queen. It then went on to rehash all the old scare stories that have already been countered by the Yes campaign. I confess I was looking for a lot more. Sadly, it seems the No arguments have run dry.

This is an interesting book and certainly brings al the arguments together which makes it useful for anyone who does not know much about the issues. For anyone who has kept up to date with the arguments, you won't learn anything new. I'll give it four stars because of George Kerevan's excellent analysis but anyone looking for a powerful argument as to why Scotland should remain within the UK will feel let down by the NO case.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Useful sets of arguments, yes and no, 20 Jun 2014
By 
William Podmore (London United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Journalist George Kerevan puts the case for voting Yes in the 18 September referendum. Alan Cochrane puts the case for voting No.

Kerevan offers us an English parliament, and calls for Welsh and Northern Ireland self-rule. He opposes what he calls a ‘little Britain’ attitude, but taking Scotland out of Britain would clearly result in a little Britain.
He praises immigration because it “makes labour markets more flexible”, the usual employer’s attitude. He assumes that adding numbers of people adds to GDP. He fails to notice that if Scotland had a different immigration policy from England, there would have to be border controls between England and Scotland. And only 2 per cent of Scots want a more liberal immigration policy, as Cochrane notes. Further, Britain is outside the Schengen free travel agreement, but Scotland would have to join it. Again, border controls would result.
Kerevan says that he wants to increase R&D spending, but he makes no mention of the threat to R&D that break-up would bring, as Scotland’s leading scientists recently pointed out.
Kerevan follows Salmond’s gamble that the Conservative, Labour and LiberalDemocrat parties were bluffing when they ruled out a currency union if Scotland voted to secede.
Cochrane observes that break-up would destroy jobs in shipyards, defence-related industries and at the Faslane and Coalport bases.
The Scottish government wants to continue to charge 36,000 fees to students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland, but, if Scotland became a separate state, this would be illegal under EU law. (For the EU, absurdly, allows governments to discriminate within member states, but not between member states.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Where are the Reasons?, 26 May 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Scottish Independence: Yes or No (The Great Debate) (Kindle Edition)
I was looking forward to reading this book from two well known and informed commentators. It starts with the Yes arguement from Mr Kerevan and is well written and puts that side of the question well. So far so good. Then in the second part, Mr Cochrane simply repeats all the usual stuff we've heard already with the usual lack of balance or indeed any sign of good reasons for the "No" campaign other than "Better Together" which leaves me in the dark as to why this is so. Seems the "No" campaign is the same old same old "Vote No and things will get better tomorrow", but as we all know, tomorrow never comes.
Overall, it's just an OK read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars good detail, 4 Jun 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Scottish Independence: Yes or No (The Great Debate) (Kindle Edition)
very informative, it tends to get bogged down with necessary detail in places
overall a good addition to this important decision
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Only search this product's reviews