Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
TOP 500 REVIEWERon 22 October 2014
Based on the real life memoir of Jordan Belfort, we follow the rise of this young, hungry stockbroker (DiCaprio) who learns the quick way to the top unscrupulously. From living on the poverty line, to living a lavish life of wild parties, drugs, sex, fast cars & his inevitable downfall by the FBI.

The Wolf of Wall Street's almost 3 hour run time is an excessive charting of the eccentric people Belfort comes into contact with or surrounded by in the industry, that indeed he himself soon turns into an equally eccentric, unrecognizable person from that young, hungry stockbroker he started out as. Initially for the first hour it is an interesting journey of rags to riches with a little skirting of the law & bad boy behavior. As the next hour & 45 minutes delves deep into the greed & mass excess lifestyle of drug addiction, sex addiction, relationship implosion & FBI/SEC agencies coming knocking as things spiral out of control. This movie isn't a serious dramatic offering like 1987's Wall Street but instead a satire with a mixture of silly & subtle comedy styles spread through the film. The comedy scenes with DiCaprio & Jonah Hill in particular were the ones that i enjoyed the most. The satirize approach means the drug addiction & sexual content goes way over the top, from snorting cocaine from hookers bottoms, to mass orgies etc... with little time passing without scenes of one or the other & F-bombs every other word. Indeed it is more a film about focusing on the excess & greed , than it is a film with characters you actually care about or follow much in the way of development after the first hour. Martin Scorsese behind the camera is pretty spot on in immersing you into this lifestyle, from the rowdy trading floor to the mansions & excessive parties. Along with some neat touches of Goodfellas-esque narration & one particular funny car journey from the country club with an interesting twist.

Leonardo DiCaprio (Titanic) carries the film impressively as you can't take your eyes off him, featuring in pretty much every scene, his acting quality is consistent & never wavers. He has a great supporting man in Jonah Hill (21/22 Jump Street) whose acting chops are well & truly established, he's given a chance to show off his unique silly comedy style here in different extremes & gives you an idea of the realms of excess the movie goes into with his more outre humor. There is a host of good supporting talent including Matthew McConaughey (Mud) as an eccentric stockbroker, Jean Dujardin (The Artist) as a shady Swiss banker, Kyle Chandler (Super 8) as a dogged FBI agent & Joanna Lumley (The New Avengers) as an English cougar...i mean rose.

In conclusion, The Wolf of Wall Street is a satire on the life of Jordan Belfort which succeeds in charting the macho, unscrupulous methods & excessive lifestyle route to the top as these untouchables come crashing down to Earth. But at almost 3 hours long it was too indulgent, repetitive & morally hollow. Contains strong language, violence, mature themes & sexual scenes (full frontal nudity). Worth a watch.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
This is the rags to riches story of Jordan Belfort, played by Leonardo DiCaprio. He comes from a working class, blue collar background, and wants to climb to the top of Wall Street, by hook or by crook. He gets a job with a backstreet firm of stockbrokers, selling penny share stocks to working class families, and through sheer force of personality, charm and chutzpah, starts earning mega bucks ($70,000 US dollars in one month alone)
He realises few get rich working for others, and so he sets up his own stockbroking business on Wall Street, hiring buddies who come from similar modest backgrounds. Their mantra is rules are made to be broken, and clients are suckers, who can't be parted from their money fast enough. The business goes from strength to strength, and Jordan and his mates soon have more money than they can find ways to spend.
$2000 suits, $1500 hookers, qualudes and cocaine, yachts, beachside mansions, Lamborghinis and Ferraris, Rolex watches, the self- indulgence of these multi-millionaires has no limits.
Inevitably, as the business prospers, both through insider trading and manipulating stock markets, the U.S. authorities, primarily the FBI, start to take an active interest.
Leonard DiCaprio is consistently excellent. He gives a very melodramatic performance, with lots of tub thumping speech making, a performance very much from the Al Pacino school of acting. Jonah Hill, as Jordan's sleazy, right-hand man, is even better, arguably the most likeable unlikeable character, since Sean Penn's slime-ball attorney and counsellor-at-law in Carlito's Way ( Carlito's Way [Blu-ray] [Region Free] ). These two very much steal the show, although the lady who plays Jordan's wife is very effective too.
Inevitably, comparisons will be drawn between this movie and Oliver Stone's Wall Street, and also Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire Of The Vanities ( Wall Street [Blu-ray] [1987] [Region Free] Bonfire of the Vanities [Blu-ray] [1990] [US Import] ). Bonfire was a so so interpretation of a great book, and is less effective than Wolf. It's closer to call when matching this film up against Wall Street. They are more or less equally good, choosing one over the other would basically boil down to whether you prefer the combination of DiCaprio and Hill or Charlie Sheen and Michael Douglas. This movie has a harder edge than Wall Street, whilst Wall Street had more likeable characters, particularly Martin Sheen's character. Overall, if I had to watch one of the two films again, I'd definitely go for Wall Street.
The main difficulty with this film, is the complete absence of any sympathetic characters. Although Jonah Hill's role is quite amusing, you don't find yourself rooting even for him. I love the USA, my partner and I own a holiday home in Florida, and we have several American friends. However, this film is a near 3 hour advertisement for all that's bad in American society, and anybody watching it, would shudder at the thought of having anything to do with our cousins over the other side of the big pond.
The people in this film are uniformly avaricious, duplicitous, bellicose, immoral, depraved and obnoxious. Their souls are as bad as their suits are good. The movie overall, is basically a thinly disguised celebration of lechery, debauchery, and all the worst excesses of wealth. If the performances of DiCaprio and Hill weren't superb, and the two of them do basically carry the movie, the film would only be on a par with, say, Kevin Spacey's Swimming With Sharks, i.e. a movie who's bark is much worse than its bite ( Swimming With Sharks [DVD] [1996].
I wouldn't dissuade you from renting this film, but I'd advise against paying the full price for the blu ray. I think buying Wall Street on blu ray is a better choice, if only because I think that film will stand the test of time much better. Or else, read The Bonfire Of The Vanities, if you haven't done that already - The Bonfire of the Vanities.
Thank you for taking the time to read this review.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
on 3 September 2014
I enjoyed The Wolf of Wall Street. I'm not convinced it's up there with the best of Scorsese but for a 3 hour movie it flew past in a whirlwind of excess and was certainly never dull.

It's based on the memoir of Jordan Belfort about his sky highs and depraved lows as a stock broker on Wall Street in the 1990's. It may be a lazy comparison but the film shares much with Goodfellas in terms of story arch and structure - Belforts rise and rise to become The Wolf and the inevitable crash and burn that must follow.

Leonardo DiCaprio of course plays Belfort and puts in another cracking performances, narrating and anchoring the tale in a similar fashion to Ray Liotta/Henry Hill from that previous Scorsese classic. There's great support elsewhere from Jonah Hill and a whole raft of familiar faces including a memorable cameo from Matthew Mcconaughey. It's all ably directed by Martin Scorsese, bringing the stylistic flourishes you'd expect, perhaps the main reason it all flies past so breezily.

Admittedly it's probably not going to be to everyone's taste - while there's not much violence of any description, there's a huge amount of bad language, shed loads of nudity, copious drug use and a distinct lack of a moral compass. Pretty much how I imagined Wall Street in the 80's and 90's to be honest.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
11 of 13 people found the following review helpful
on 15 January 2015
An adaptation of Jordan Belfort's memoir chronicling his rise and fall on Wall Street and his hard-partying, addiction-fuelled personal life.

Welcome to Martin Scorsese’s 22nd feature film, another of his examinations of the rites and rituals of a particular sect, be it the wiseguys of ‘70s Little Italy ( Mean Streets ) or the society scions of late 19th-Century New York ( The Age Of Innocence ).

With its rise-and-fall arc, its hedonism and hubris, its gleeful exploration of the dark side of the America Dream, its money, crime and narcs, its sex, drugs and rock’n’roll (though the soundtrack also takes in Madness, Simon & Garfunkel and a fair bit of Euro pop), The Wolf Of Wall Street forms a loose trilogy with GoodFellas and Casino. And if it can’t quite match the energy and quality of those classics, it nonetheless stands as Scorsese’s finest for 15 years.

When we first meet Jordan Belfort, he’s more pup than wolf, his lowest-rung job at L.F. Rothschild requiring him only to “smile and dial”. A first-day lunch with big boss Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey, hilarious) sows the seeds of the chaos to come, though: Hanna advises him that the stock market is “all fugazi” while preaching the worthlessness of morals and the necessity of greed, cocaine and, to stay relaxed, jerking off twice daily. Then, on 19 October, 1987, the very day Jordan becomes a licensed broker, the market crashes and Rothschild goes under.

Jordan joins a penny-stocks firm in Long Island, employing a bunch of expert salesmen (mainly weed) from his old Queens neighbourhood and making Donnie Azoff (Jonah Hill, terrific) VP despite his phosphorescent teeth and shoulder-slung pastel sweaters.

The triumphant result is named Stratton Oakmont, and if there’s one thing these guys know how to do, besides sell, it’s party – Jordan blows $26,000 on a lunch, is married to a model, shags prostitutes five, six times a week, and hoovers Quaaludes, Xanax, cocaine and morphine. It’s only a matter of time before the FBI (in the form of Kyle Chandler) come calling…

Perhaps deciding the crazed behaviour is enough, perhaps thinking he took stylistic verve as far as it could go in GoodFellas , Scorsese shoots largely with a static camera. His use of whip pans, crash zooms, freeze frames and tracking shots proves so infrequent that Spielberg, visiting the set, suggested he might want to move the camera. But TWOWS is far from muzzled.

It is, of course, all part of Scorsese’s plan to charm viewers into accepting Belfort’s outrageously selfish, unthinkingly cruel behaviour. It works, too – more so because Terence Winter’s ( Boardwalk Empire , The Sopranos ) screenplay cleaves to our anti-hero, refusing to investigate the fallout of his misdeeds as he steals from rich and poor alike to line his own pockets (and mirror). It’s a decision some will take issue with, just as some, justifiably, accuse Scorsese of being in thrall to his gangsters.

But this is Jordan’s tale, and it’s sold by a magnetic, never-better DiCaprio.

A touch too long, yet never slack, at three hours, TWOWS benefits from independent funding, Scorsese’s brass balls and an A-grade cast’s turbulent improvisations to emerge as an epic, boldly broad screwball comedy about the state of America, then and now.

Despite the US censors trimming back the screwing and swearing, this is an audacious, riotous epic. Scorsese and DiCaprio’s fifth and best pairing, it’s liable to give the Academy a heart attack.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 30 July 2015
Everyone I'd spoken to raved about this film but I just don't see the appeal. I suppose if you like the fantasy of working somewhere that routinely brings in prostitutes and strippers, where men engage in laddish behaviour that would make an 18 year old in Magaluf blush, and take a ridiculous amount of drugs then this film is for you. I don't even mind that content as it's something I'd expect to see if the film is based around the lavish lifestyle these men enjoyed. However there didn't seem to be an awful lot of actual film around this aspect of it.

Leo Di Caprio is a fantastic actor, no question about it. However his character moves between sex with random women, taking drugs, and shouting down a microphone at his staff, and that was about it. I thought it was starting to get interesting when the FBI were introduced but all it showed initally was an agent placing his targets' photographs onto a board. Then we're straight back into an American college movie type party scene of beautiful women who are all topless.... ah now I see the appeal of this film for the men...! ;)

In all seriousness, I'm no prude but I did expect this film to have a bit more substance. My favourite scene in this film was when Patrick Denham (Kyle Chandler) the FBI agent was chatting with Belfort on his yacht. It was then I thought oooh here we go. They're sniffing about each other and now we get some authority vs scoundrel type action (and I was thinking a sort of Catch Me If You Can type scenario), but nope. Shame, because Kyle Chandler is a great actor but he's under used in this film. I'd even say Di Caprio is under used. I know he won awards for his performance, but his character is so shallow the script doesn't really give these actors a lot of opportunity to add some depth.

Maybe it's a grower and I should watch it again. I tend to find that if I'm checking my phone during a film/TV show that's usually a sign that it's not holding my interest and that was the case here. At nearly three hours of very little actually happening, this film can't afford to be lazy with the story but it is. I just don't see the appeal.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 25 June 2015
Greed and lust. There’s the plot in two words. Want some more words? Lies, drugs, sex, swearing, and of course, money. This is the terrifyingly true story of the rise and fall of stockbroker Jordan Belfort, a man in the late 80’s went from conning the working-class to opening Stratton Oakmont, where his illegal dealings went mass market. Belfort is a hedonist; snorting coke, popping Qualuudes, and sleeping his way through New York. But his biggest addiction lies at the heart of the film: money.

The Wolf of Wall Street is mesmerising and unyielding. You are sucked into an incomprehensible world, where there’s a hooker every day and throwing dwarves is a reasonable thing to do. And that’s just in the office. It’s sleazy, it’s immoral, but you can’t tear your eyes away.

A mixture of hilarity, vulgarity, and violence; it engaged every emotion from laugh-out-loud laughter, to jaw-dropping surprise, to pure horror. At three hours long, the film was pushing it, but considering the amount of excess lavished in the film, what are minutes alongside everything else?

Credit where credit’s due (which is something the stockbrokers did not say), the film is genuinely funny. DiCaprio has once again proved himself by playing a despicable character, and his versatility is shown as he slips from smooth salesman to drugged-up crack-head. Belford is utterly unlikeable, yet completely watchable. He has no morals, no guilt, which is important because as much as we enjoy watching him, we never empathise with him.

Whilst watching, we’re all Jordan Belfort. The film is like one of his Qualuudes dropped in water, fizzing and ready to explode as we start to swig it in. It takes us on a high; we’re drawn into a dysmorphic world that is nothing is like the reality we live in, and we can’t get enough of it. But the crash is hard and painful, and only on exiting the cinema do the thoughts creep in. Why are we so obsessed with greed? Why were no victims shown? And is it okay that Belford is profiting with his new-found celebrity?
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Golden Globe winner Leonardo DiCaprio stars in the title role of Jordan Belfort. Belfort works his way up the ladder making money in penny stocks, i.e. "selling garbage to garbage men." His scheme is to sell these garbage stocks to rich investors due to the high commissions. Along the way he does some illegal transactions as he runs his corporation like a frat party in "Animal House." Having not known money, he and his crew are ill equipped to handle it.

I thought that Jonah Hill gave one of his best performances. The production is awfully long, not wanting to miss out on any details. The film goes into detail to explain to the audience things like IPO and the history and effects of quaaludes. If you note the ludes he took early in the film were crumbly. Those were non-prescription ludes made from a pill press in uncle Vinnie's garage and not too potent. Later they score some real ludes. Having taken the fake ones for so long, they didn't know how to handle them causing them to crash, like the money it was too much too fast.

The main criticism of the film is that it featured over 500 F-bombs. It really didn't seem like that many due to the length of the production. Besides you get numb to it after the first few hundred or so.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Very enjoyable movie but with some loose ends. It is all about the dark art of selling. Closer to Glengarry Glen Ross than Oliver Stone's Wall Street. I like the way 'fault' can easily be attributed to all those who bought from the Wolf and his staff as much as to their sales technique. They sell something which does not exist.

Powering these salesmen is sex and drugs. This insulates them from stress or conscience. Alcohol works the same way for the general population. One of the loose ends is not making it clear, not showing how prevalent the Wolf's behaviour is throughout the Wall Street banking area. Only one speech alludes to this.

Time lines are also difficult to sniff, I mean follow. But Spielberg's Catch Me If You Can has a much better movie style. I bought the blu ray version with chicken and veg. at my local supermarket. I think the dvd would have been just as effective. I thought it would have been as marvellous to watch as The Aviator or another open plan office flick the brilliant All the President's Men. But it fell short of those marks.

My review title is my main concern. Did the big banks behave in exactly the same manner on the run up to 2008 crash? But the movie's success does prove how fond we are of excess. More is good. Stability is too elusive.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful
on 27 July 2014
"The Wolf of Wall Street" is an overly long black comedy about a crooked Wall Street broker who makes his fortune in the 1990's. The lead role is played with gusto by Leonardo DiCaprio who seems to have subscribed to the Jack Nicholson school of acting.

The whole movie is so completely over the top with a large amount of foul language, sexual depravity, drug abuse and general bad behaviour that it is hard to believe that it is supposedly based on a true story. Its this outrageous behaviour that gives the movie its best moments though as you can't help but laugh at the hedonism on display.

Unfortunately though for most people with any sense of morality the characters portrayed in the movie are a group of the most unlikeable, unethical, greedy and dispicable people you can possibly imagine. If you consider that people like these were responsible for the worlds financial difficulties in the new millenium you wonder who it is you are supposed to empathise with. There are many similar movies dealing with the rise and fall of drug dealers, and it seems that anti-heroes are popular with cinema audiences at the moment. I found it difficult though to sit through a three hour long movie where all the main characters were scumbags and there seemed to be little moral judgement of their behaviour.

"The Wolf of Wall Street" has its moments, but it is far from being a classic Scorsese movie. The film never convincingly feels like it is set in the 80's and 90's and while they obviously had fun filming it I noticed a large number of continuity errors between shots which was surprising for such an experienced director. You can't help but compare this movie to the old Michael Douglas film "Wall Street" of which it seems to be an updated, more exagerrated version but one with a lot less charm.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 5 June 2014
I think this film is a respectable exemple of who wants something eventually he manages to get the thing he wants. Naturally, when you become so powerfull, you also become so crazy and so obsessed by what you want and I think Leonardo Di Caprio has perfectly managed to send us this message. The Wolf Of Wall Street is kind of a funny comedy but with an important message: never back down.

This film is very long but also very gripping still because it's a bit fast-moving and so believable.
It's a very realistic film but I'm surprised that this kind of film, only in this case I think, it's even hilarious.
If you have never seen this film, you can't judge it or underrate it.

In a few words The Wolf Of Wall Street talks about a man who doesn't want to give up because he wants the best for himself so I would recommend this film anyone who has interest maybe in economy but primarily at all the young guys who are enterring the workplace for the first time in their life but ultimately, I think this film must be seen by everyone.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
     
 
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
American Hustle [Blu-ray] [2013]
American Hustle [Blu-ray] [2013] by Christian Bale (Blu-ray - 2014)
£3.99

Django Unchained (Blu-ray) [2013]
Django Unchained (Blu-ray) [2013] by Jamie Foxx (Blu-ray - 2013)
£6.85

Dallas Buyers Club [Blu-ray]
Dallas Buyers Club [Blu-ray] by Matthew McConaughey (Blu-ray - 2014)
£6.00
 
     

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.