Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Thoughtful but sometimes overly dogmatic
Sandifer's analysis of this key period of Doctor Who is smart and challenging, treating the stories as serious texts and subjecting them to appropriately rigorous analysis. However, he clearly has a number of bugbears that recur through the book, most obviously his allegations of racism with regard to The Talons of Weng Chiang. Now, I agree that some aspects of Talons...
Published 10 months ago by Alan Hansen

versus
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Infuriating and challenging
Sandifer provides some interesting and thought provoking observations on the first part of Tom Baker's time as the Doctor, showing a commendable independence of thought. This is spoilt however by some ugly prose, which makes reading the book jarring and tiresome. Additionally he is prone to tedious hyperbole, especially when dealing with views that differ from his own...
Published 10 months ago by M. J. Stead


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Infuriating and challenging, 4 Feb 2014
By 
M. J. Stead "Michael Stead" (Bournemouth, UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Sandifer provides some interesting and thought provoking observations on the first part of Tom Baker's time as the Doctor, showing a commendable independence of thought. This is spoilt however by some ugly prose, which makes reading the book jarring and tiresome. Additionally he is prone to tedious hyperbole, especially when dealing with views that differ from his own. The tone is closer to bullying diatribe than objective analysis. Useful, but not enjoyable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Thoughtful but sometimes overly dogmatic, 5 Feb 2014
By 
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: TARDIS Eruditorum: An Unofficial Critical History of Doctor Who Volume 4: Tom Baker and the Hinchcliffe Years (Kindle Edition)
Sandifer's analysis of this key period of Doctor Who is smart and challenging, treating the stories as serious texts and subjecting them to appropriately rigorous analysis. However, he clearly has a number of bugbears that recur through the book, most obviously his allegations of racism with regard to The Talons of Weng Chiang. Now, I agree that some aspects of Talons make for uncomfortable viewing today and this should not be glossed over. But those parts are surely forgiveable in the context of the time in which the story was made, not least the yellowface performance of John Bennett as Li H'sen Chang. Sure, discuss these issues, point fingers where it matters, but Sandifer pretty much dismisses this hugely popular story entirely because it doesn't fit with his 21st-century sensitivities. And immediately afterwards he dismisses Mary Whitehouse as "a sanctimonious prude of the worst sort". Which is probably a pretty accurate summary of the ghastly woman but it could also fairly be directed at him.

It's a pity because, as I said, I'd recommend this book highly for any serious fan of the original series (or Proper Who as it's known in my house). I know Sandifer's intentions are good – yes, racism is A Bad Thing – but a more nuanced response might have helped his cause better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2.0 out of 5 stars TARDIS Obtuseorum, 26 Dec 2014
By 
Greystone (Lancashire, England) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Haven't much time for this guy really. He's a Moffat Muppet of the first order with very little appreciation for what I would consider to be true Doctor Who. One of these people who cry's blood because a certain person has been used as a racial stereotype judging everything by the bleeding heart culture we endure today. The type of chap who slags off 'Tomb of the Cybermen, (example) because it doesn't have Star Wars type special effects. News for you Sandifer, nothing from that period does have Star Wars effects. They didn't exist then. As for story content, yes, story - that's the bit between the special effects - I don't think you'd know one if it walked up and slapped you round the face. My only regret is I bought all the books before reading the first one. A stupid thing to do but I have paid the price. In conclusion unless you think the sun shines out of Moffat's rear end, don't waste your money.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Sandifer hits it out of the park again, 20 April 2014
By 
Martin L. Meenagh (London) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: TARDIS Eruditorum: An Unofficial Critical History of Doctor Who Volume 4: Tom Baker and the Hinchcliffe Years (Kindle Edition)
Superb stuff, written in with considerable style, summing up the glory years of Doctor Who and placing them in a uniquely persuasive cultural context. This or any slice of the eruditorum are perfect for a wet weekend or those moments on the bus or tube...just be prepared to miss a stop or forget a meal.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Only search this product's reviews