Most helpful critical review
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Please don't buy.
on 11 January 2014
An absolutely terrible load of drivel which could have been better written by a 12 year old. I can't imagine how this 'author' can be classed as an historian. A list of dates and places, sensationalised titbits, obviously about 5 minutes of research. How this garbage has been published I can't imagine. No analysis, no real effort to even make a story out of a list of 'facts'. Assumptions, conjecture and poor writing style made even worse by the fact that when you scroll a page, the rest of the paragraph is missing or the previous page's second half is repeated. Also only took 20 minutes to read the entire thing - I have honestly never read anything so poor. Would like to give it a negative score.