Top critical review
3 people found this helpful
Too much weak evidence spoils what could have been a thought provoking book.
on 10 March 2013
I think the author would be a "good" politician, he is very good at emphasising the "evidence" that suits his argument and ignoring other evidence. I think he destroys his credibility by using too many examples and not researching more thoroughly. A quick internet search shoots down several of his examples.