Customer Reviews

22 Reviews
5 star:
4 star:
3 star:
2 star:
1 star:
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review

120 of 126 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Superb!
This is the first Grayling book that I have read, and I'm very impressed. Although short, it is a classic example of quality rather than quantity - good points, well made, beautifully written, and attractively bound.

I won't compare it directly to "The God Delusion" (Dawkins) because it is a totally different kind of book (philosophical rather than scientific)...
Published on 17 April 2007 by Jack Richardson

67 of 71 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Not bad, but no new eye-openers
This is a small booklet about why we shouldn't respect religion a priori, about Intelligent Design, and morality; it explains why there's no such thing as a fundamentalist atheist, and what's the difference between the words atheist, secularist, and humanist. Grayling prefers the word "naturalist" instead of atheist (the contrary of "supernaturalist", being any religious...
Published on 26 May 2007 by M. de Boer

‹ Previous | 1 2 3 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

11 of 103 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Another Dawkins flea, 24 Nov 2007
David Robertson "The Wee Flea" (Dundee, Scotland) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Richard Dawkins complains about those who are like fleas on his back - seeking to make money out of his success. This book certainly falls into that category. Short (very short), it is nothing more than a collection of six small essays, put in nice packaging and sold to the faithful. I guess that this would not matter if the quality was good but this is by far the worst of the anti-God books currently riding on Dawkins back.

Right from the beginning Grayling uses straw man arguments "faith is a commitment to belief contrary to evidence an reason" being the first example on page 1. That is a definition of faith which no Christian theologian would share. The whole book is poorly written and inherently self contradictory.

Sometimes the arguments are just plain silly (and an embarassment for someone who claims to be a leading philosopher). For example the statement that no wars have been fought over rival theories of biology. Does this include creationsist theories? Does it include Hitlers belief that the Germans were biologically a better race than the Jews? Is he seriously saying that atheism has never motivated anyone to violence (try asking Stalin)?

His attempt to equate all religious people with suicide bombers, to claim that all religious people are de facto child abusers and his complete lack of understanding of religion (and his glorification in his own ignorance) means that this book is a cheap (although financially expensive) and nasty piece of propoganda. It will only appeal to those who already share Graylings faith. Fundamentalist atheists will love it (not least because it reassures them that they cannot be fundamentalists!), intelligent Christians will be bemused that someone can be so full of ignorance and hatred, and the majority of people will be bemused and wonder why such an insubstanial work got published at all. Perhaps Dawkins is right - there are those who are seeking to fleece the gullible and make money out of their beliefs?!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

15 of 209 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Not another one!, 5 Jun 2007
Whoops, another God bashing book is released and AC Grayling jumps neatly on the Dawkins bandwagon and into the laps of eager atheists and amused believers.

The notion that religion is in decline is a recurring piece of wishful thinking on the part of the world's atheist minority. Whereas many in the UK are, indeed, spiritually bankrupt, belief is very much on the resurgence in other parts of the world, particularly in areas formerly labouring under communist (or other) repressions.

Is atheism a form of religion? It's certainly a lifestyle. Take a look at for an example of just how rabid atheist thought can be. Links there will also take you to atheist personals, atheist dating, atheist merchandise and atheist clothing. What next, an atheist theme park?

Likening belief in God to a belief in the tooth fairy or magic goblins merely invites derision from the religious community, and justifiably so. The continual atheist bleat about the lack of scientific proof for the existence of God merely overlooks the notion that current science may simply not be up to the job. Until someone develops a `Godometer' we are in the position of stone age men trying to detect and measure microwave radiation.

Talking about this book in a national newspaper prior to its release, Grayling suggests that the time has come to pick sides. I'm entirely with him on that one. The various weaknesses of the established church have, quite rightly, been under public scrutiny for some years. It's only fair that atheism (naturalism, secularism, humanism or whatever else you want to call it) and its many absurdities should share the spotlight.

Grayling also talks about the importance of reason (There's that loaded word trundled out yet again!), reflection and sympathy. To see any published atheist use the word `sympathy' is refreshing in itself and is a credit to his background as a philosopher. However if Grayling believes that his existence is a fluke of nature in a blind, uncaring universe then he must reflect on the knowledge that his life, by definition, can enjoy little in the way of real meaning, purpose or future. That is the real tragedy of the non-believer.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

‹ Previous | 1 2 3 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Only search this product's reviews