Top critical review
15 people found this helpful
Good but lacking important illustration or a date of publication.
on 9 February 2013
An excellent book as a reference but it lacked 2 important things:
1. No maps. Very important to make sense of the detailed descriptions.
2.The date of publication. I spent a great deal of time trying to work out the historical perspective of the writer.Eventually I deduced that it must have been 1888. This had a significant importance in understanding some of his comments.