Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
7
4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
5
4 star
1
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
Format: Kindle Edition|Change
Price:£13.19
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

TOP 500 REVIEWERon 3 October 2012
While better than average and not a bad summary of the Plataea campaign, this Osprey Campaign title does have numerous problems that make it hard for me to rate it more than three stars. First, there are two pieces of hype which may be somewhat misleading, for want of a better word, although I do not know whether this is intentional or not.

The first, which is the book's subtitle, is not too important. The quotation - "the most glorious victory ever seen" - is rather overblown. A more accurate subtitle would have been something like "snatching victory from the jaws of defeat", given the way the campaign and battle happened. A related minor point is the title itself: the contents of the book also include the battle of Mycale, which took place around the same time, although very probably not of the exact same date.

The second is a bit more problematic. The author claims in his section on "further reading and bibliography" that "there was not a single book in English" before 2010 and since 1904 "on this enormous and very important battle". The claim is rather exaggerated and not quite true. While there were not any book that focused ONLY on MAINLY on this battle, there certainly are a number of books that describe it in at least as much detail, and sometimes more, that this book does. What makes things worse here is that the bibliography omits at least some of them from its list. The prime omission is the major work of Peter Green titled "The Greco-Persian Wars" which the Osprey book largely borrows from without mentioning it explicitly at any point.

Then there are a number of statements on which the author does not elaborate upon, possibly because of the usual space constraints that tend to limit the amount of explanations that can be provided. One example, among many others, is about the enormous strategic and economic importance of the island of Cyprus (page 11). While it is possible to guess why Cyprus was so important by looking at a map, there is no way for a customer that has no particular background in Ancient History to understand the island's economic importance (among other resources, it had large mines of copper, used for making bronze, and timber, for shipbuilding). Another example is the author's choice to emphasize, alongside the traditional bronze breastplate, the "linothorax" or "linen breastplate", and to describe it at a lighter, more flexible, more comfortable and much cheaper alternative to the bronze ones. The problem here is that linen needs both a hot climate and lots of water to grow so while it may have been cultivated in large quantities in the Nil Delta, it is doubtful that it was abundant or even grown in Greece, and, assuming it had to be imported, it would certainly not be cheap. What would have been a cheaper form of body armour, and almost as effective while still light, would have been leather cuirasses, but these are not even mentioned. Then there a problematic statement according to which slaves were rowing triremes alongside poor free citizens. While this may have occasionally have happened in times of emergency when there were not enough citizens to crew all available ships, the text make it sound that this was common practice. This does not seem to have been the case, on war-galleys at least, if only because rowers of triremes had to be highly trained and motivated to be able to react swiftly to command during naval engagements.

Then there is a problem with the numbers of the opposing forces, and this is one area where the author has not followed Peter Green. The Osprey volume assumes that the Persians at Plataea were 200 000 all told, including some 50000 "medizing" Greeks, with about half of these being hoplites. The numbers are rather excessive or even impossible, especially on the last case, and feeding such a mass would have been a huge challenge. Macedonia seems to have had few, if any, hoplites at the time, whereas hoplite numbers for Thebes and Beotia were probably around 12000 altogether, or roughly the same number as the Athenians and other allies that opposed them on the left wing. To a large extent, this discrepancy in numbers derives from the traditional assumption that most of the field army stayed in Greece whereas Xerxes marched back to Asia across Thessaly, Macedonia and Thrace with a smaller number of troops. Peter Green takes the exact opposite view, based on his analysis of the strategic context for the Persians after their defeat at Salamis.

The decisive battle was Salamis, rather than Plataea, with Persia losing its mastery of the sea and exposed to sea-borne attacks against Ionia in support of possible Asian Greek uprisings. Given this strategic context, which the Osprey book fails to provide, it is much plausible that Xerxes took the bulk of the Persian army back with him, leaving Mardonios with a smaller but hand-picked force (some 30000 according to Peter Green).

The description of the battle itself also has a few problems. The three main phases are well presented, but the intentions, plans and tricks used by each of the two commanders are sometimes a bit confusing. For instance, the story about the Spartan battalion commander disputing his King's orders of the battlefield just as the Persian cavalry was about to attack is utterly ludicrous and out of character but the author does not seem able to make up his mind as to whether to give it credit or not. Another point omitted by the author is to explain how the Persian infantry after crossing the Aesopus attacked immediately, although disorganized. Here again, the author seems to have relied on Peter Green, but borrowed only part of the story and did not include the interesting thesis that the Persian attack might have gone badly wrong and not at all according to plan.

Then there are the casualties. The author is very discreet on Persian losses, since he would have to come up with some huge and impossible number, given his estimate of the initial force. He does accept the figure of around a thousand hoplites killed on the Greek side (Peter Green mentions about 1300 for the Greeks and some 10000 for the Persians out of an initial total fighting force of 50000 for the latter - numbers which are much more plausible) of which 600 belonged to the centre and were cut to pieces by Beotian and Theban cavalry.

Finally, the maps, diagrams, pictures and illustrations are mostly good. One illustration showing the fight between Mardonios' wing and the Spartans of Pausanias could be a bit problematic. The bottom left of the illustration shows a Spartan hoplite who has reversed his broken lance and continues to fight with the butt end. His heavy shield covered in a layer of bronze is transfixed with two Persian arrows. This could be hard to reconcile with the main text which states that Persian arrows were light and made of cane.
44 comments| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
I love finding out about the past and whilst I did get history lessons at school, it never really dealt with the sort of things that I was interested in, that of the battles and troops that shaped the past. For me, perhaps none more so than the battle of Plataea which kept Europe out of the hands of the most powerful Empire of the time, the Persians.

This title released by Osprey takes the reader by the hand and leads them through the events that led to the battle, the troop movements, the forces arrayed on both sides as well as the social and political aspects of the day. Its wonderfully detailed, the artwork within beautiful and the whole thing is explained in fine detail for the reader.

Add to this the fact that this is not just for the military history buffs but is a great tool for writers to utilise as well to help get the flavours correct and it's a title that fulfils a lot of different angles for all readers in general. A great addition to the Osprey publishing house and one that I really recommend to others.
22 comments| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
This is a well-written and superbly illustrated account of the campaign. It is the successor campaign to that of Thermopylae and Salamis in 480 BC, and following the victories of Plataea and Mycale the war was carried into the Persian territories.

The Contents are -
P05: Origins of the Campaign
P17: Chronology
P18: Opposing Commanders
.Persian; Greek
P22: Opposing Forces
.Persian forces, weapons and tactics; Greek forces, weapons and tactics; Numbers
P38: opposing Plans
.Greek; Persian
P42: The Campaign to Plataea and Mycale
P50: Plataea
.Opening action; Middle phase (10-11 days); Final phase: the last 24 hours and `the most glorious victory ever known'
P79: Mycale
.Amphibious operations
P86: After the Battle
P90: The Battlefield Today
.Plataea; Mycale
P93: Further Reading and Bibliography
P95: Index

The Colour Plates -
P12: Map - Clashes and confrontations [Greece, the Aegean and the coast of Asia Minor]
P43: Map - Movement of forces
P46: Map - Attica and Boeotia
P51: Map - The Battlefield of Plataea
P52-53: Colour Plate - "The Athenian archers hold the line". This is a spectacular painting, with `a cast of thousands'. In the foreground, with their backs to us are about 17 Athenian figures, hoplites and archers, who are firing into the flank of the attacking Persian cavalry, who are wearing down the Megaran contingent, visible in the distance on the right of the picture, with hordes of Persian in the centre of the picture, in the angle between the two Greek forces.
P58-59: Colour Plate - The Persian Cavalry cut off the Greek Supply Column. This is another crowded scene, as Persian cavalry sweep in from both sides of the pages to envelop a Greek wagon train. I counted 40 distinct cavalry figures in the middle distance, with more, shadowy figures, behind, and 3 in the left-foreground, with 5 Greeks in the foreground with ox-carts, and more Greeks, cards and donkeys in the middle distance.
P63: map - The middle phase of the battle
P66-67: ¾-view plan: Plataea 479 BC - the final 24 hours of the battle
P70-71: Colour Plate - "The most famous victory ever known". This is a superb melee scene, as the Greeks surge across the left and foreground into the Persians. I counted about 30 figures in the immediate foreground, with many more in the middle distance, with hordes more disappearing into the dust clouds in the background.
P79: ½-page map - Cape Mycale
P82-83: Colour Plate - The Greek left storming the Persian camp at Mycale. I didn't even try to count the figures depicted here. This is a ¾ view of the Greek army pouring up against the palisade of the Persian camp. I have seen smaller wargaming armies deployed (and I don't mean DBA).

All the colour plates come with terrain and suitable details in the backgrounds. No expense is spared by the artist in this volume.

There is a superb collection of colour photographs supporting the text, including Greek vase paintings, surviving artefacts, such as armour and weapons, and photographs of the terrain.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 17 June 2012
One of the best osprey I have read.

Everything is there, not too much militaristic jargon, beautiful plates and maps and a good amount of picture showing the battlefield as it is today.

The historical context is also very well presented. The author refers to previous battles such as Salamis but keep it short without overlaping the other ospreys that deal with these already.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 June 2013
This scholarly book is both comprehensive in terms of the context of the battle and convincing in terms of the battle narrative. The author tells an historically plausible version of the plataea story and I for one am totally satisfied.

But the revelation for me, getting back to the context, is the chapter outlining how the Persians had fought and beaten Greek hoplites before Marathon and Plataea. The author also concisely describes how the Persians invade Europe several times, Xerxes campaign being the culmination.

So the army that faces the Greeks at Plataea is entirely capable of destroying the the Hellenes. The Persian commander succeeds in splitting the Greek army and in concentrating his forces against the Spartans and Tegeans. It is at this moment that the Spartan army shows its quality and, quite literally, snatches victory from the jaws of defeat.

This is the great strength of the book - the entire campaign narrative shows that the Persians should have won but for the peculiarly professional nature (for this ancient era) of the Spartan army.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
TOP 500 REVIEWERon 5 September 2012
I liked this book a lot. It is very well written and well "organized", which means it uses efficiently the limited space available (at 96 pages Osprey Campaign books are short). The origins of the 479 BC campaign, both distant and recent, are well explained. The organization, the equipement, the plans and the commanders of both armies are clearly described. The campaign and the battle itself are also very well covered, with good maps which allow the reader to easily follow the developments. The book describes also very briefly the destruction of Persian fleet (beached and surrounded by fortifications) at Mycale, the same day the Persian army was defeated at Platea.

I learned a lot from this book, including - to my surprise - that in this battle both armies seriously blundered and both commanders (Pausanias for the Greeks and Mardonius for the Persians) lost control over the largest parts of their forces. However the Greek superiority in close quarters fighting meant that Mardonius absolutely needed to secure an overhelming superiority in numbers on the most crucial spot - something that the loss of cohesion of his advancing army denied him. It cost him both the battle and his life.

I was also quite surprised by the importance of Greek "medizing" contingents in Persian army, with the city of Thebes offering a particularly strong contribution. There are also other things to be learned from this book, but you deserve to discover them yourself.

Illustrations are good and the FOUR color plates by Peter Dennis are simply gorgeous! This title finally broke the ancient "curse" of almost all previous Osprey publications on Greek-Persians Wars - for some reason the color plates were always in some way messed up. Well, not this time!

Bottom line, this is a very good Osprey title and I recommend it warmly.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 May 2016
Very well written and informative for anyone interested in this period of history
Delivery was first class
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)