32 of 32 people found the following review helpful
on 7 January 2004
I bought this album on vinyl when I was about 15 (in 1982 or so) - having already exhausted the Beatles back catalogue, I set about moving onto the solo releases - but isn't that what everyone does? - and I absolutely loved it.
Twenty or so years later, I still think it's a great little record. If you like Paul McCartney, then you'll love this album - every song exemplifies the man, and his capacity to write superb pieces of music, the occasional wonderful lyric, but more than any of that, this record presents Paul as a soon to be solo Beatle, proving to himself, and everyone else, that he COULD do it on his own, no matter how terrifying that prospect was at the time.
Other reviews will cite the classic songs such as 'Maybe I'm Amazed' as the reason for buying this, but for me 'Junk' and 'Every Night' are comparable, and certainly Junk is one of the most poignant songs that has EVER been written. Even tracks like 'The Lovely Linda' - throwaways to some - offer a quirky insight into McCartney's mindset at that time, and the strength of the relationship he had with Linda was defined forever.
Yes, there are elements of home 'doodling' on some tracks, but so what? It isn't indulgence, it's called 'talent', and he was more than capable of playing whatever instrument he needed (and had done so on a number of occasions within the Beatles - listen to his demo of 'Come And Get It' as an example). But this was the first time that he didn't have to answer to anyone other than himself, and this collection of songs demonstrates the excitement and fun that he generated by playing and recording everything himself. It's mostly a very upbeat record, with the odd nervous glance at the future thrown in for good measure.
But regardless of what anyone else has said about McCartney's 'form' at this time, this was a man very much on top of his game. He'd done his best to drag the Beatles through the mire that was the Get Back sessions (and pick up the Day By Day series of Nagra tape rolls if you can), saw the Abbey Road project through to completion, and now he took time out to relax and think about the future. Place yourself in his shoes... you're in the biggest band in the world... a band that has been your life for 13 years? And then it's over... how frightening is that?
That the public were probably expecting more supposedly Beatlesy material is not McCartney's fault nor problem. But none of these tracks are out of kilter with what he wrote for Abbey Road and Let It Be, and many of these songs were presented to the Beatles during those sessions, but held back/rejected.
To sum up, this is a wonderfully warm and intimate record, made by a music genius... one of the few that we have left. If you've never heard it, buy it and cherish it.
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Paul McCartney's first solo release after leaving The Beatles is a simple, charming, homemade album, with some tracks emitting an unfinished demo-like aura which, strangely enough, is the appeal of this real gem in Paul's back catalogue. I bought this album for the first time nearly 20 years ago and it has been a regular visitor to my CD player ever since. There are many things about this release which make it so likeable - there are classic McCartney compositions such as the gorgeous "Every Night", the beautiful "Junk" and the timeless, impeccable "Maybe I'm Amazed", which remains one of the greatest love songs ever written by any artist. There are also tracks which are the sound of McCartney letting go, jamming and making music for music's sake, such as the fantastic "Momma Miss America" and the catchy, bluesy "Oo You".
Paul raids a couple of his previously written or unfinished compositions such as "Hot As Sun", an instrumental written in the late `50s, and "Teddy Boy" which was written in 1968 but never appeared on a Beatles release (apart from the "Anthology"). The rest are experimental, enjoyable glimpses into Paul's newly found creativity as a solo artist. The whole album is an interesting statement from somebody who has found a new, unwanted artistic license to do anything he pleases - and "McCartney" is his response. I readily admit that I love this album, despite the flaws and the indulgences, but the warmth and playfulness Paul's 1970 release radiates more than compensates for the one or two moments which don't quite work.
This album is probably one of the greatest responses to the people who criticise Paul's post-Beatles output without knowing the depth of his catalogue. Some of the tracks gained exposure thanks to Cameron Crowe's great film, "Jerry Maguire", which featured "Singalong Junk" and "Momma Miss America" but this fantastic slice of McCartney remains one of the best kept secrets in Paul's closet. If you want a real treat, then invest in this album, but be warned - it may make you want to buy everything that Paul has ever released. I know I did - and I didn`t regret it.
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
on 2 September 2011
The music: shows the inventiveness of Paul McCartney at a high in 1970; and while these are the offcuts of his work - not really finished as they could have been by the band - the quality is such that they give great enjoyment still.
The sound quality: is clearly stronger than the 1993 remaster, particularly the quality of the vocals.
The extras: include two out-takes (less finished than the tracks that made the cut) and alternative version of Oo You and 4 live tracks, including two versions of Maybe I'm Amazed one from 1974 and one from 1979. The most surprising extra is probably the 1979 Hot as Sun - a surprise that he is still playing this 9 years later and a surprise that it sounds so strong.The extras disc, then, is also well worth having.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on 16 February 2012
Paul McCartney doesn't seem to view his work in the same way his peers in the pop world view theirs. Perhaps it's a hangover from those two-albums-a-year Beatles days. He doesn't make two albums a year these days, for which we should probably be grateful. But he isn't seeking to make masterpieces either. His post-Beatles albums can mostly be summed up as: these are the songs I've got knocking about at the moment and if you don't like this one, you might like that one; and if you don't like any of them, you might like something on the next album. He doesn't always finish everything off, or make the best of every idea. Quite a lot of half-baked ideas get through the net - if there is a net.
I'm not saying that's necessarily a good way to create a body of work. It isn't the way most pop stars work, certainly. However it is the way a lot of very credible and mostly obscure artists work. And they get away with it because they were never in The Beatles and the genius evident in a proportion of their work has never received the recognition it deserved. And it never will do, because they were never in The Beatles and their albums only contain glimpses of genius amongst a lot of half-baked and probably bad ideas.
McCartney has made some "proper" pop albums (Tug Of War springs to mind). This isn't one of them. Other reviews here outline the story behind this - his first solo album. Suffice to say that not every track is finished, not every track has a great idea behind it, and some tracks probably don't have any idea behind them at all.
But two of the tracks are Maybe I'm Amazed and Every Night. And if that doesn't mean anything to you then you should buy at least the cheaper version of this album. Because they're two of the finest pop songs anyone has ever written. (It's a testament to McCartney's talent that playing every instrument on Maybe I'm Amazed, he conjures up what you'd imagine a Beatles version would have sounded like.) And there's enough other decent stuff here to merit the purchase.
What comes between those tracks is a mixed bag. This isn't an album so much as a scrapbook. It's music made for McCartney's own amusement. When The Lovely Linda breaks down after 40 seconds, his laugh suggests he made it up on the spot to get her attention - and got it. Maybe it's self-indulgent. But it's charmingly self-indulgent. And oddly, the Liverpudlian with the London house and the Scottish farm somehow made a record with a remarkably Americana feel.
This isn't a proper album. This is mostly Macca mucking about. It isn't the best record ever made. And that isn't the end of the world. There's some fun to be had here. If you want it, here it is, come and get it. And if you don't like this one, there'll be another one along in a bit. He's not the Messiah; he's a talented boy making music for the hell of it.
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful
on 16 July 2011
If you don't have this album, why buy it? This is not your typical polished Macca album. It was recorded pretty much at home (plus some sessions in Abbey Road and Morgan Studios) - more like a series of demos than 'the final product' - in the wake of the Beatles' split. All the more fascinating for that; it includes McCartney's final take on Teddy Boy (demoed for the Beatles, never used) and the raw, soulful Maybe I'm Amazed. If the songs here were taken forward to a 'produced' album, which would have been included? McCartney has recently (MOJO mag, Aug 2011) cited tracks Junk and Maybe I'm Amazed as "woulds" and That Would Be Something as a "maybe".
If you already have a copy: is it worth replacing it with this remaster? YES. Mastered by the same team that remastered the Beatles' catalogue, the result is clear, 'close-to-mic' and - appropriately for this intimate 'DIY' album - as literal as it could be. The sound quality is amazing...
The card packaging for this reissue is good: a booklet with all the shots from the original album, and more. The second CD is basically a selection of live tracks (Glasgow, '79) and some out-takes. But the value is in the remaster of the original album; that's well worth the asking price.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
on 20 October 2011
This re-released edition of the 1970 album MCCARTNEY is certainly worth purchasing to hear what I think is an enjoyable album and sounds like it's just come from the "Let It Be" Beatle Sessions.
The instrumentals might not be that special, but tracks like "Man We Was Lonely" and "That Would Be Something" are catchy tunes. The highlights of the album though are "Every Night" and the wonderful "Maybe I'm Amazed".
This edition also features a 2nd CD with material from some live performances and unreleased songs in the studio.
Overall I find this a must buy for any Beatle/McCartney fan and I hope you find like me that it is a good album, and possibly one of Macca's best post-Beatle ones too!
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 24 September 2013
So this was it: the end of the Beatles. Although Ringo Starr had released his Sentimental Journey a month earlier, nothing on it actively suggested the band was finished. Meanwhile, McCartney casually told the world (via a press release bundled in with the album) the Beatles were splitting up. It's not surprising that it met with some hostility, particularly from the other Beatles. Paul had not been the first to leave the band, yet he pulled the ripcord in public. (He did this a month before the release of Let It Be, which put a lot of extra pressure on the band's unintended swansong.)
Given its turbulent back-story and place in the group's dissolution, it seems sensible to expect a grand statement from McCartney musically as well as historically. But it's not like that. McCartney is a deliberately low-key record, largely composed of instrumentals and sweet songs knocking around for years beforehand. It's self-produced, played and sung by McCartney entirely solo, and lyrically offers no grand statements on the Beatles, life, or anything. At first glance it's an album Paul could just as easily have put out years earlier, with the Beatles still going beside it. If you think of it as the album Paul decided to make at the expense of the Beatles, it may well disappoint.
If you can cut through the history and expectation, there is much to like. "Junk" is a beautiful tune, lilting and sad. Though it's tempting to read into the lyrics ("bye bye, says the sign in the shop window, why, why says the junk in the yard") as end-of-the-band melancholy, the song pre-dates the break-up. However, the mood is appropriate. It's reprised as a more haunting instrumental later on, which serves to suggest "Junk" (no pun intended) as the album's theme, if there is one.
Elsewhere, the music is entirely jolly and laidback. "The Lovely Linda" seems cloying and dopey, the sort of thing other Beatles would veto; without them, here it stays. Similar goes for "Teddy Boy", a very Paul-ish narrative ejected from Let It Be. "Man We Was Lonely" has such a pleasant bounce you wouldn't know it was hurriedly "given lyrics one day after lunch", and "That Would Be Something" seems cheerfully improvised, with Paul muttering in place of drum fills.
More important thematically, "Every Night" describes Linda McCartney's importance to Paul, and works as a gentle domestic counterpart to the album's one raucous moment (and probable highlight), "Maybe I'm Amazed". Less momentous, the various instrumentals barely register after they're finished, pleasant though they are.
Without the instrumentation of George, the biting wit of John or the production of anybody, the songs on McCartney can seem maddeningly slight. That's presumably the point: here is an album that won't try to conquer worlds or change music the way Abbey Road or Sgt. Pepper's did. It's an unfortunate irony that it's still expected to do so, with Paul's sense of timing (and choice of press release) partly to blame. It seems even worse in hindsight, with All Things Must Pass and John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band making more direct efforts to tackle the end-of-the-Beatles hype, leaving McCartney in an almost irrelevant place. However, that's all hype and history: this is just Paul making music, and on those terms it's a sweet, honest effort.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Paul McCartney's debut solo album is refreshingly lo-fi, a collection of do-it-yourself stripped back home recordings that for the most part sound more like demo's than fully-worked up songs, and therein lies it's charm. Admiteddly not all of these songs hold up so well in isolation, and some feel more like fragmented sketches than complete works, but taken as a whole this works brilliantly at stripping away the then overbearing myth of the Beatles and getting close to an artist enjoying the process of writing and recording music. With Paul performing all the instruments and fully half of the album consisting of instrumentals this is as far away from commercial considerations as you can get: 'McCartney' is a ramshackle and uneven record, but also a very charming and honest one. A great debut.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 4 March 2004
Announced, somewhat controversially, before the official breakup of The Beatles, McCartney was given to the press along with a release that made the band's death apparent.
Expectations were obviously high considering Paul's sterling contributions to Abbey Road. The lush closing medley especially seemed to promise something of ornate beauty.
What Paul delivered however, was something very different.
McCartney is a minimalist, even lo-fi, masterpiece. Far from being the saccharine songsmith that he has for so long been presented as (Though this opinion finally appears to be changing) Paul is often equally as dark.
There are several types of song on display:
1. The conventionally Beatlesque (Every Night, Junk, Teddy Boy, Maybe I'm Amazed). These songs, if taken out of the context of the rest of the album, are the most typically Paul. Maybe I'm Amazed is an immediate standout track, a powerful ballad in the same vein as Let it Be, whilst the others have a closer feel to 'Mother Nature's Son' and 'Two of Us'from Paul's Beatles work. It is too easy to see the rest of the album as 'filler' around these tracks.
Lovely Linda is a cross between the above style and...
2. 'Open form' tracks, often based around a simple motif (That Would Be Something, Man we was Lonely, Oo You). That Would Be Something carries a strong groove, as does Oo You, both of which are strong tracks and ulimately very rewarding on repeat listens. Man we was Lonely hints at the harmonised style of the sublime Ram album, but is less successful than its peers.
3. Instrumentals (Valentine Day, Hot as Sun/Glasses, Momma Miss America, Singalong Junk, Kreen-Akrore). These are the most experimental of McCartney's tracks. Valentine Day and Momma Miss America are both very strong pieces of music, with an almost dance beat. Singalong Junk is an instrumental in the more usual sense, whilst Hot as Sun/Glasses and Kreen-Akrore are the strangest and least accesible tracks on the album. The glasses section is a beautiful piece of ambient sound and reminds me strongly of the feel that Brian Wilson was trying to achieve with Wind Chimes on Smile. The final track, Kreen-Akore, is a drum solo with heavy breathing, closing McCartney with the sound of someone who has nothing left to give, collapsing with exhaustion.
The whole experience is so unexpectedly strange, stark and awkward, that you are left wondering what you have just heard. At least within the context of the album it followed.
Listening to it today, it still sounds fresh. It would be followed by Ram, a return to a more conventional sound, but the wistful spirit it unlocked would permeate that album also.
The remastering is clear, especially for '93. It would be interesting to see if any out-takes or demos exist that could compliment McCartney in any future release. These would be welcomed.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 31 January 2001
This McCartneys first tentitive step into a world without the company of his former bandmates is a gentle home spun affair that is more like a work in progress demo than a finished album.Not that this is any less an album of say 'Ram' or 'Band on the Run', just something that gives the listener an insight into the embroyonic development of Pauls music of that time.Recorded in his home in St Johns Wood during the heady breakdown of the Beatles affairs Paul was very much going it alone with a trial and error process of recording and overdubbing that gives the album its sparse and sometimes lonley feel. The opening track 'The Lovely Linda' was an experimental sound check that made it to the final cut, songs like 'Teddy Boy' and 'Junk' uncompleted ideas from the 1968 India trip that are classic McCartney whimsy showcasing his skill to create alluring melodys and in the case of 'Teddy Boy' a song that is tender a touchingly retrospective of love lost. While 'Man we was lonley' and 'Oo You' were very much free falling tracks the album is nicely balanced with the inclusion of 'Maybey i'm Amazed', the only studio recorded track that could have been on 'Abbey Road' if fate had not dictated otherwise. Try 'McCartney' out with an open mind and you'll enjoy its company.