Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop Cyber Monday Deals Week in Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now DIYED Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen in Prime Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars19
4.4 out of 5 stars
Format: Kindle EditionChange
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
TOP 500 REVIEWERon 19 August 2011
"On Liberty" is ideally suited to the Kindle format as it is quite short. The introduction gives some interesting backgound information rather than analysis or insight.

This essay is also one of the most important books on political thought of the nineteenth century. Fortunately for the 21st century reader it is also one of the most accessible. Mill was a libertarian who chose not to base his defence of liberty on natural rights but on his own revised version of utilitarianism:
"I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions...grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being."
This enables Mill to argue that freedom is needed if man is to be able to explore all the avenues of human development that allow the human race to progress. Total freedom is impossible so what determines the legitimate boundaries of freedom? Mill distinguishes between self-regarding and other-regarding actions. The former should never be interfered with and the latter subject to limitation only if they harm the legitimate rights of others.

For Mill free thought is a self-regarding action which should not be curtailed, and free thought is virtually useless without free speech. He was opposed not only to legal curtailment but also to social conformity, for he feared a "tyanny of the majority". Mill then proceeds to add a utilitarian argument in favour of free speech: if an opinion is silenced then mankind is necessarily the loser whether the opinion is true or false. He advances a number of arguments to support this, concluding with the claim that a climate of freedom is essential for "great thinkers" and "it is as much, and even more indispensable to enable average human beings to attain the mental stature they are capable of." He has no truck with paternalists seeking to guide people's thoughts in the "right" direction. He was equally hostile to the idea that people had the right not to be offended; hence he opposed the blasphemy law. The single case Mill gives of an acceptable limitation of free speech is the case of corn-dealers and an excited mob. An opinion expressed in a newspaper that corn-dealers are "starvers of the poor" is legitimate, but the same view stated to an angry mob outside the corn-dealer's home may be limited if it "is a positive instigation to a mischievous act."

Mill concedes that actions cannot be as free as speech and seeks to establish the proper limits of freedom of action. Mill proposes that "the sole end for which mankind are interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number is self-protection." Because he rejects paternalism he opposes all interference with self-regarding actions. Mill would not have prevented people from taking drugs and he would have led the opposition to seat belt legislation. Mill even rejects state interference with liberty for the sake of crime prevention, e.g. poisons can be used for criminal purposes. Mill was willing to accept a register of their sale but not the banning of them. Mill believes we must not interfere with the "rights"of others but these are narrowly circumscribed and Mill makes it clear that "rights" are not the same as "interests". Hence cut-throat laissez-faire is legitimate. As for moral decency arguments Mill does say that sexual intercourse in public is unacceptable, and though fornication and gambling are acceptable he is in two minds about whether pimps and casino-owners should be allowed to operate. Mill says it is a difficult case that is on the borderline, but adds that in general we must resist attempts to limit behaviour for "moral" reasons because any such action is likely to be the thin end of the wedge.

Though Mill is a very determined anti-paternalist he makes three exceptions: children, primitive societies and the disabled. Children must be guided until they reach maturity and they must be given compulsory education - something not given legislative force until 1871. As for primitive societies we must resist the notion that Mill was a typical Victorian believing in the "white man's burden" or inherent differences between races. He simply observed the reality of the world in the mid-nineteenth century but made it very clear any intervention in backward societies must be temporary with the aim to bring about self-government as soon as possible.

Hence Mill was a much more determined libertarian than most modern writers on the subject. There is just one example where, at first sight, Mill may seem reactionary to modern readers. He wished to restrict the right to have children to those who could prove that they could support them. However, those who today wish others to be allowed to procreate at will do so on the grounds of human rights. Mill based his theories on utilitarianism, and not on rights. There was no welfare state when Mill wrote "On Liberty" and he was concerned with the well-being of children born to people without the means to support them.

In view of the growing restrictions on freedom in Britain this is a book well worth reading again. In particular I like Mill's argument that every restriction on freedom is the thin end of the wedge, providing a justification for further restrictions.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 5 July 2013
How often in life dies one get the opportunity to take inboard a dose of wonderfully erudite information completely free? Well if one belongs to a good library and selects wisely, ALL the time, but with Kindle now many of the best known, and most thought-provoking, tomes can be delivered to you without even having to find the bus fare or the shoe leather required to hit the library trail.

I took this opportunity, having just vaguely heard io John Stuart Mills and, as a direct result, have had my mind opened and my my ideas shaken up sharply. I strongly recommend this publication to all those who feel jaded and worn out, it will amaze you if you open yourself up to the possibilities offered by it for self development and personal extension.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 September 2015
Mill does tend to adopt a fairly waffling prose, however if you want the basics of what it means to have individual liberty and in what ways that can be associated and lived in within a democracy than this is your book.

The chapters are laid out well but themes and thoughts are often repeated throughout, so have patience to find things that are new. In fact to get a broad overview of a chapter you can do this by reading the first and last paragraphs. This will miss several examples and illustrations in which he cements these ideas within history and in a way that may be useful to understand.

Having said this this is a pretty easy book to read, so if you are a beginner in philosophy or the subject of liberty and utilitarianism then this is perfect. What is especially good is the last chapter (5) which is just of applications which uses his theories and thoughts and applies them to practical instances. This is useful to get to grips the theory, and if you study philosophy a perfect thing to draw on when trying to explain and discuss Mill.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 9 May 2013
This is the ultimate work on Liberty and Freedom by one of the ultimate free and critical thinkers.
It should be required reading in every secondary school and university.
It shows why people should be free to choose their own way, with as little outside interference as possible.
It is very readable and understandable.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 13 April 2014
Justifications of persons' liberty and boundaries of that liberty in both of narrow personal and broad state perspectives.
It is strongly recommended for every lawyer or a any other social active person.
The problem of the book I found is the complexity of the language. One may easily get lost among parts of a single sentence.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 23 January 2013
easy to read on my kindle, its also easy to navigate chapters, which not all ebooks are. Came in very useful for one of my modules for my degree, I had to read loads of different thinkers so the fact that this was free was just great and instant delivery to my kindle was good too.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 November 2013
I really think this is an inspiring book. I wish that everyone would read it. Mill argues for liberty with skill and with, what for him, might be classed as passion. He takes every one of the democratic freedoms, of speech, of association, of movement and argues for each one. he shows the forms of tyranny and the more subtle ones as well such as that of mass public opinion against the deviant or the independant. His "If all the World but one,were of one opinion argument is well known but not well known enough.
To read Kill is to understand the value of argument and discussion as opposed to squabbling and fighting.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 8 June 2014
A Classic. Nothing else need be said but for the imposition that there need to be a least a certain umber of words in a review. Now that I've reached said number I can end review here.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 July 2015
Given the recent attacks of charlie hebdo I felt like i needed some schooling in the importance of free speech and free expression. Utterly brilliant essay that illustrates the importance of not silencing any opinion no matter how radical or 'offensive'. It also highlights the way in which even when censorship of some horrible words and opinions sounds like human decency and social responsibility, this power that no-one has the right to wield could bestow some one not so decent and it can turn ugly very quickly.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 6 May 2015
Nice ideas on the freedom of speech and the foundations to modern society
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
Customers who viewed this item also viewed

On Liberty
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill

Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.