4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
The "12" viewing certificate does not mean that there is material not suitable for younger audience, but clearly has to do with the more adult-oriented overall theme of the film, and their understanding / appreciation of it. The story of a young boy-robot programmed with emotion, as naive and simple as it may seem, proves a most complex and demanding affair. Yet, it makes for a riveting tale of how the feeling of love is overpowering his robotic programming. Not coincidentally, just like Antoine de Saint-Exupery's "The little prince", "A.I." is also a universal piece of art, with the youngest, yet, most wise protagonist. "The little prince" taught us that the essential things in life are seen not with the eyes, but with the heart. "A.I.", respectively, tells us that children give us the truthful wisdom we seek. This impressive Bluray presentation is most satisfying with the often massive audio and visual improvements (the much talked-about grain issue is finally put to rest), contributing to the movie's conceptual and executional excellence. Only let-down is the absence of any new extras, as those featured on here are the exact DVD bonus material with nothing new added. Still, a must-have item. Incredibly inspired, immaculately executed, spectacularly entertaining, utterly sublime, "A.I." is Steven Spielberg's (and Stanley Kubrick's) hidden masterpiece, a breathtaking contemporary fairytale.
26 of 29 people found the following review helpful
on 27 July 2011
Okay, let's get this out of the way, this is a grainy film, one of the grainiest I have bought in fact. Now let's get something else out of the way, it's supposed to look like this. Spielberg shot an at times washed out, dreamy and soft looking film, and it is shown here, warts an' all. It is not a bad transfer as some may think, a bad print wasn't used, nor could any "remastering" have been done to improve it. Applying DNR to "smooth" out the level of grain here would have probably created one of the worst Bluray releases so far. It would have removed every detail and texture and left us with a very bland picture. As it is the grain does dampen things a little, such is the speckly nature of it, but there is still far more detail shown here than on any previous release.
However, intentional or not, it is very grainy, this is more noticable at the start of the movie where it's mostly daytime scenes. It can be a bit distracting, but it also adds to the feel of the film. When things go a bit darker, in tone as well as in lighting, things do improve. The Flesh fair looks very good, the special effects hold up well, and that continues for the rest of the feature as they venture into the city and beyond. By the halfway mark the grain for me wasn't a problem, my eyes had adjusted, the grain had settled due to the darker scenes and more often than not, it looks very good. If I was to compare it to another bluray release, it would be Minority Report. If you were happy with the look of that film on Bluray then you should be fine here, if you thought it was too much then maybe pass on A.I.
We have a nice supply of extras on the disc. They cover many aspects of the movie from AI's creation, design, lighting, special effects, the robots, the actors, the soundtrack etc. Plenty to get your teeth into really.
Finally, if you can overlook/don't mind the level of grain here, then this is a good release and definitely a step up from the DVD. I saw A.I at the cinema and remember it well, it was never going to look silky smooth, and what we have here is a faithful representation of the Directors vision. It won't be for everyone but hopefully this review helps a few people in their decision.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
I loved this movie. It may be not as magnificent as other Spielberg and Kubrick works, but it is still a great moment of cinema. I watched it with a great emotion and I was afraid for the little hero (or rather two little heroes - let's not forget Teddy...) from the beginning to the end. It made me cry twice, no matter how much I tried not to. It really reached deep into my heart as no other movie managed to do in years... So, there is no other possibility - five stars.
I agree however that AI is clearly a patchwork of ideas rather than one project. It is because this story was worked in all successively by four very talented but very different men. It began as a short story ("Supertoys last all summer") by Brian Aldiss, a great name of British SF, known mostly for his magnificent "Hothouse" novel. As most of SF writers from 60s and 70s Aldiss was very pesimistic and his writings are usually rather sad and gloomy. His mark is clearly visible in the movie.
The short story was rewritten in a scenario by another great name of SF, Ian Watson, who of course left his own personal inprint. The person who had the idea of making a movie about a modern SF version of "Pinocchio" was the great Stanley Kubrick. He never realised it however and when he died, according to his last will, the project went to Steven Spielberg.
Spielberg inherited a very sad, depressing and dark tale of suffering and despair and he simply couldn't realise it like it was. He changed the story, mainly removing the "horrible bad ending" and replaced it with a kinder "not so happy end" which so many reviewers didn't like. Well, me for one I think he was right because ending AI differently would give a movie that only a really bad person (and by saying this I really mean "a sadistic sociopath") could like...
You probably already know what this story is about - a robot child, who was programmed to love his foster parents and who wants just to be their child, nothing else... but even that little will prove to be too much to ask... No other spoilers. Haley Joel Osment gives here a performance as brilliant as the one he gave in "Sixth sense". Jude Law and William Hurt are good in second roles. A great "star" of this movie is Teddy, a little teddy-bear robot, once a very expensive and cool toy, now obsolescent and falling in pieces... The scenes in which he is fixing himself with a needle and some yarn will probably touch the coldest hearts.
This is NOT a movie for children! I strongly warn you against watching it with them, unless they are at least 12. Some of the scenes are very disturbing (like the execution of "strays", robots which were abandoned or chased away by the owners) and even after the little Spielberg touch, this movie is still terribly sad.
All in all, I believe you should watch this movie, at least once - you will not regret it. And you can also use "A.I." as a medical test - if the final scene doesn't have any effect on you, you should see a doctor...
42 of 49 people found the following review helpful
on 8 March 2005
This has to be a contender for one of the most disturbing films of all time. This is because it addresses a central question of existence - what is love? Can it be created? Does it have to be earned? Is it it always unquestioning? The answers it comes up with are painful and incredibly sad. Ironically, I don't believe this film is about 'what happens if we make machines too human?' just as pinnochio wasn't about how we would feel if wood could talk. The main subject was that of belonging and identity. How far would one go to be approved of? Would you change yourself completely to be loved? (in the case of David from a robot to a boy - and it wasn't his fault he was a robot). What if the changes and sacrifices you made were not enough? Some have said that the ending to this film was too fairy tale like. I disagree; it also was profoundly sad. It highlighted that despite the lengths to which we might go for love/approval, it is all still impermenant. Tragedy in the extreme, but thought provoking and moving.
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful
on 10 October 2007
Stanley Kubrick was right to identify his long-gestating A.I. project as being more aligned to Steven Spielberg's sensibilities. But it's a double-edged sword: the result is a muddled concoction of the latter director's tautest emotional drama, his most sumptuous visual excesses, and his most turgid sentimental stargazing. In that order.
The film is inspired by the short story Super-Toys Last All Summer Long by Brian Aldiss. The first reel of the film - an eerie family drama with an undercurrent of creeping techno-horror - bears most resemblance to the original text. In spite of key questions going unanswered - literally, what will a robot child become? - it's also the most successful section of the film, with effective performances from Frances O'Connor (as Monica Swinton) and Sam Robards (as Henry Swinton) and a chilling one from Haley Joel Osment as their adopted robot son, David. When Monica and Henry's real son wakes from his coma, Monica cannot face the idea of David being destroyed, and so she dumps him in the woods with his companion Teddy (probably the cutest CG creation ever).
And so A.I. broadens its horizons and loses its focus. David and Teddy find themselves at a 'Flesh Fair', where human hicks go to trash their robot counterparts. Here they meet love machine Gigolo Joe (Jude Law) - he's fun, although it's somewhat tan of Spielberg to present him so sexlessly. The fair itself is the one of those slightly cringeworthy depictions of futuristic hedonism where people listen to obnoxious electroclash music and dress in luminous armour. The ensuing adventure takes the robo trio to the sumptuous Rouge City and beyond, to the soggy New York City of the future.
From the above it may sound like I loathe the film, but that's not the case. It's themes are expansive and are presented via a fiercely intelligent script. Spielberg not only nails concepts arguably too large to be nailed down - love, loneliness, and mortality - but he also wraps them up in a satisfying five-part narrative structure. The fifth part is as bold as can be - Kubrick would have approved of the 2,000 year leap into the next age, just as he would have appreciated Ben Kingsley's determinably old fashioned opening and closing narration. (There are further cameos from Robin Williams, Meryl Streep, and Chris Rock - keep an ear out.)
Like Professor Hobby's (William Hurt) lifelong ambition to manufacture a child capable of love, perhaps the film's ambitions are out of its reach. It will always be the runt in Spielbergs litter. For while films such as War of the Worlds and Hook were of depressingly low quality, both achieved a level of global popularity on which Spielberg has always thrived but which would apply to A.I. How could it? It's too baffling, beautiful, and ambiguous. It's art.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 14 December 2013
As Kubrick bought the rights to A.I. based on Brian Aldiss's short story "Super-Toys Last All Summer Long" it became a problem for him as he realised that with all the complexities of the story and his vision of putting it on screen the SPFX of his day could not do it justice especially in creating the main human-like android of the original story, and so he sat on it.
When he met Steven Spielberg and saw Jurassic Park he realised that the industry SPFX were right to achieve his goal he handed the reigns of production in 1995 to the young filmmaker. Ironically it was in 2001 that Speilburg made the film and I'm certain that Kubick would have approved.
on 1 April 2012
What a great movie. Teaming with special effects and a fantastic cast. It follows the tale of a `mecca' child created to replace lost children either through illness or death. Hayley Joel Osman is believable in the role of `David' the mecca child created to out do all other mecca creations. He has intuitive functions and is built to `love'. When his family's own child comes back home he is plagued by this child and his friends, it becomes obvious he can't stay there as it isn't safe for him or the family. Rather than return him for destruction as is the rule for mecca children because they are `imprinted' to only love one family, his `mother' sets him free in the woods and tells him to run. He meets a lover mecca, Jude Law, who also ends up on the wrong side of the law after being framed for the death of a woman he was supposed to meet. They travel to find `the blue fairy' who in the story of Pinocchio made him a real boy. David is convinced that his mother would love him and have him again if he was real. He does not know that his whole development is being closely monitored by the company that created him. The heartache and pain they gave him force him to develop and seek out help. He finds his way back to them but rather than being faced with the reality of being a robot he goes to the depths of the ocean where there is a submerged fairground, there is a beautiful statue there of a fairy with blue gown and furled wings. The ending is a bit of a let down. He sits under the ocean for millennia begging the blue fairy to make him real and gets discovered by aliens who are visiting what is then a planet covered with ice and no trace of humanity left. He becomes the last survivor of our race.
Very long film but worth watching.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on 17 October 2011
Surely this must be one of the most beautiful films ever made. The robot boy simply wants his adopted mother to love him. The ending is so sad, a real tearjerker. And this from someone whose other favourites are usually bloodthirsty or action films.
Technically I didn't find any of the defects mentioned in other reviews, but I only have a 37inch 720 Plasma, although at the beginning I was not aware that I was watching a Blu-Ray disk. However later on in the film, in the night sequences, the Blu-Ray showed much of the detail, previously hidden.
In my top ten films, looked good to me on Blu-Ray, glad I bought it, while still available.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
on 8 October 2003
I will start with the usual criticism problem, as most critics betray their own insecurities with the usual interrogative and criticizing writing style,which will keep potential lovers of a film away from good cinema. When one REVIEWS a film, you forget about yourself and your personal preferences and dislikes. One looks at the film in an objective and proffesional manner.
Now about A.I. A wonderful piece of cinema created by one of the masters of modern cinema. As film is a collaborative art form, I am delighted to see Spielberg and the late Kubrick's work combined in the film, as it is balanced between cynicism and optimism.
Film is about stories, and A.I. based on the classic tale of Pinocchio is a story that grips and pulls through to the end.
It also consists of thought provoking elements, which Isaac Asimov and Phillip Dick touched in their writing. Who are we as humans to say that we are the most important beings on the planet or Universe? Are we the only beings that feel love and experience emotional hardship?
Haley Joel Osmond (starring as David) is brilliant, portraying the protagonist role of the robot boy which feels real love. Osmond plays the part completely selfless and convincing.
Excellent cinematography (kaminski) and production design (carter), but falls correctly to the background as so many recent hollywood films have all TECH but very little story.
About the ending, of which so many 'critcs' have bad mouthed, it's all but a 'happy ending' in so many ways. Human's have seized to exist, and our creations (the super 'evolved' android beings) have taken over, being much better and kind hearted than we could ever be. Remember the words of Gigolo Joe "They fear us, because in the end all that will remain, is us".
Also, as humans we only have one chance to do the right thing. A single pathway.
To finish, my rating lacks one star because I found the pacing in the second act to be a bit slow. Otherwise I found it a very pleasing and satisfying film. Highly recomended.