Shop now Shop now Shop Clothing clo_fly_aw15_NA_shoes Shop All Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop Amazon Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Voyage Shop Now Shop now

Customer Reviews

186
4.3 out of 5 stars
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 30 November 2012
Like many people, I kind of 'knew' the Congo: Heart of Darkness, and the horrors of the Belgian Congo, right? What I hadn't realised was what a mess it still was, and to get a sense of the scale of the potential and the waste. I'm not a big fan of travel writing, and this suffers from some of the usual cliches and ticks of the genre: the fact that a lot of travel is essential dull (how much more can you say about travelling huge distances by canoe/motorbike?), punctuated by humbling moments of epiphany. What saves this book is the history that interweaves the travel, the context, and the sense of perspective it gives. I hadn't realised that the Congo itself was so unnavigable at the moment: this made me aware of the shocking chaos - which can only get worse before it gets better, with the recent news...
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
81 of 91 people found the following review helpful
As a fan of writers like Jonathan Raban and Simon Winchester, who weave historical narrative into their own personal quests and journeys, I sent for Blood River after catching the tail end of a radio interview in which Tim Butcher described the various strands which run in parallel through his book.

I found it a compelling and satisfying read. There is the central account of the author's apparently impulsive decision to travel, against all advice, through the Republic of Congo in the first place, while it is in an on/off state of civil war; the lives of the equally intrepid Victorian adventurers who went before him; and as backdrop, the grindingly bleak and heartbreaking history of colonial, post colonial and present-day Congo. Three stories for the price of one - four if you count the heavy-hearted journey through the Congo in the late 1950's, after disappointment in love, of the author's mother.

Butcher's prose style, as you'd expect from a seasoned journalist, is crisp, economical and forward-flowing; but he is not afraid to share his vulnerabilities and his (abundantly justified) fear of what might easily have lain ahead at any point on the journey - `objective dangers', as he calls them, over which he had little control. I warmed to him for that, and for his empathy towards the ordinary Congolese he encounters: for me, they are the heroes of the story, helpless victims of an endless cycle of exploitation, violence and political bankruptcy.

Blood River is a gripping story well told; but beyond that, unlike some have-the-adventure-to-write-the-book yarns, it is highly relevant and by rights should tweak the conscience of those of us in the developed world who looked the other way.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 7 August 2013
If you are interested in the Congo and would like to read a book that offers some okay feedback, then by all means read Blood River. If, however, you've been daydreaming about heading off to the Congo (or similar) and need a push, you'll need to look elsewhere. I mean, here we are, in the heart of the tropics, in the Congo, yet not once did I feel any great sense of adventure. This is in part due to Butcher's matter-of-fact style of writing -- a novelist he will never be. I won't say it's drab, but it just doesn't ever get the juices flowing, and I'm shocked to read that some people think it's "gripping" and that it "moves along at a rollocking pace" (are these people friends of Tim, hoping to help boost the ratings?). Even if you're not particularly bothered about a so-called adventure book having a strong narrative, it's clear that Butcher didn't want to be there in the first place (the second half of the journey he covers by helicopter, and gives the most lame excuse for doing so -- I once read someone else's account of that section and they explained it as the easiest bit). Interesting: reasonably. Adventurous: not at all. A combination of the two would have been ideal.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 1 January 2014
I very much liked the style of the book, mixing historical facts, cultural observation and social commentary with the author's personal experience and emotional reactions to what he experienced on his mammoth task. It is very well written, not at all patronising or superior, and expert without being alienating.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICEon 9 February 2015
Tim Butcher attempts to retrace Stanley's exploration trip down the Congo river. He uses this opportunity to inform the reader about what conditions are like in Congo today (or about 10 years ago when he made the trip).

The author's first issue was getting permission to be in Congo at all. "Pleasure" trips such as these are discouraged and the country is a war zone. He spends some considerable time getting permission and continually reports back that people are amazed that he wants to visit this country just to retrace the steps of a Victorian explorer - it doesn't seem like a good enough reason. Actually, I agree with the officials concerned. I never really understood why Butcher needed to make this trip at all. It seemed like a publicity exercise - a trip designed to be written about afterwards and to make money for the writer. That seems very egotistical but I cannot really come to any other conclusion after all the effort that he makes to get into the country in the first place.

Having got permission to make the trip the author doesn't seem to be quite sure how he will do it. He goes from one place to another with very sketchy ideas about who may be able to take him on the next leg of his journey. He is depending very much on the goodwill of other people and there are a couple of occasions where he seems potentially to put someone's life in danger because of his desire. Most of the time he is not helped by people for whom the Congo is their home - mostly it is UN and other aid workers. This means that on his journey he can tell the reader a lot about what the landscape is like, a lot about his own privations and something about the history of the country but very little about how ordinary people live - to be fair, I am not sure that this was a purpose of the book but it does leave a noticeable gap.

The history element is interesting - although you could have got that somewhere else without the journey. Some of his "facts" about Stanley are different from those contained in Tim Jeal's excellent biography of the traveller which must have been published after this book. If you want a history of the area and early exploration then that might be a better book to read.

My overwhelming impression of this book is that the author made the journey so that he could say that he has done it and write and lecture after the event to make some money. I got some understanding of the history of the country but little about how ordinary people lived because he didn't interact much with them - in fact, he does a large chunk of the trip by helicopter. Because I didn't have a lot of sympathy with the author (or even like him very much judged by what he reveals of himself in this book) I was left with a feeling of "so what ?" by the end of the narrative.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 14 January 2014
This book was well written, as one would expect from a journalist. However, I felt, regardless of the severe discomfort and bureaucratic difficulties Mr Butcher faced, his journey was a bit of a fraud! He castigates Stanley for helping the Belgians colonise the Congo, accuses him of treating the 'natives' cruelly and lambasts him in places for being carried in a litter for some of his epic journey lasting over 2 years. Yet Mr Butcher's journey, lasting a mere 42 days, did nowhere near follow in Stanley's footsteps and he was a passenger on motor-bike, canoe ( paddled by natives ), a UN ship, a UN helicopter and finally a chauffeur driven car! At no point did he appear to be threatened with serious danger and his only hardships were tiredness, a sore arse and feeling ill on the UN ship.
On one hand he slates the Belgians for cruel colonialism, yet frequently berates the Congolese for barbaric behaviour and their yearning for some form of law and order ( as supplied by the Belgian colonists ). He also mentions, casually, at the end, that Stanley looked after his team well on reaching their destination. Mr Butcher's experience shows how much tougher and determined the 19th century explorers ( and colonists ) were in comparison to present day 'adventurers'.
The book did provide a well researched history of the region, but my overriding view is that his 'opinions' on the subject were irritatingly hypocritical and contradictory. In other words the book was more about the writing than the 'doing'.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
This book is about Tim Butcher's daring 2500 kilometre trip westward down the Congo in 2004, retracing Stanley's epic journey in 1874-1876. One might call it foolhardy, but I was inspired by his willingness to risk everything, viewed against our Western safety and aversion to danger. Without repeating details covered in other reviews, I found the book well constructed, with a journalist's precision, juxtaposing the day's events against Stanley's adventures, the backdrop of colonial exploitation, and poignant mentions of his mother's time in the Congo. The book also rings true for me personally,growing up ten miles form the Congo border, and witnessing the flow of white refugees in 1960, and the fear and dread of collapse.

I entitle my review "apocalypse" because that's what it has been for the Congo, and Butcher amply brings this out in his description of villages with no vestiges of Western products, the discovery of a railway line reclaimed by the forest, redolent of Planet of the Apes, and disappeared highways. You are back with elemental man, exploited by those in power under a cynical government, rampant corruption, and within this, a range of responses, from tribesmen making macabre thoat cutting gestures, to human kindness and honour. Butcher's reportage is powerful and real,he describes his fears, and his respect and care for individual Africans.

The carnage, the biggest war measured in deaths since World War 2,(given scant attention by the world at large, begs for explanation, and Butcher does not shirk this; savage colonial expoitation, cynical manipilation by the USA and Belgium after independence leading to the murder of Lumumba,a kleptocracy under Mobuto with the support of Western mining interests,invasion and exploitation by local African countries. I agree with Butcher when he speaks of "sovereignty" taken from African people by colonialists, and that this needs to be returned, through democracy and respect. I do not fully agree with his emphasis when he extends his conclusions about the Congo to the rest of Africa, wondering how Malaysia has done well while "the people of Africa have not been capable of working together to reign in the excesses of dictators". I think we would need a more careful analysis of this, including the fact that most African states were patched together with disparate peoples, and conversely the hopeful sighs that democracy and economic activity in Africa are both growing.

An excellent book by a brave man.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 5 August 2013
Whilst perhaps unsure about the validity of Butcher's motives to visit the Congo, this is still an entertaining introduction to the problems of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the wider Central Africa region.
The breadth of travel within the Congo by Butcher, retracing Stanley's footsteps, enables him to seamlessly merge the fascinating and often brutal history of the region through which he is passing with his own observations. This, coupled with the nature of the place he is visiting, makes the book a very interesting, if not riveting, account of his adventures.

However, far too much of the book is wasted on Butcher pondering over his own thoughts, though given that he describes the trip as 'ordeal travel', this is perhaps understandable.

This by no means a light-hearted read, and I believe Butcher's time as a journalist may have created a slightly forced writing style that errs on the side of overly-analytical as opposed to entertaining, but then again, it could be argued that this is perfect for the subject matter- the greatest untamed land in the world.

His comments about the wildlife he saw (or rather didn't see) is a great insight into the bush-meat trade and ecological issues faced by the Congo basin, however more detail on this would have rounded off an excellent book.

Ultimately, however, this is a very good book about a sensitive area of the world that never sways of its course. As an introduction to the Congo it is invaluable, and the conclusion is superb, illustrating perfectly the issues faced by the Congo.

A worthy and excellent read, authored by a brave man.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 4 July 2010
I visited the DRC six times between 2001-2004, half my visits were to the rebel held east. I didn't spend the night out of town, except for a few days on the island of Idjwi in Lake Kivu. Rebel activity, robbery, and murder were too high a risk.
Tim Butcher spends several weeks in very dangerous country in eastern DRC in 2004, he travels pillion on a motor bike, by UN boat, dugout canoe.... The book has a good brief history of the Congo as the journey progresses, and also gives an insight into the parlous state of the country nowadays. Well written, exciting, bleak, witty and full of nice portraits of Congolese he meets- and who help him make the journey possible.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful
I didn't like the sound of this book at first, thinking it was an example of macho adventure tourism but I am pleased to say that I was mistaken.

It's true that the author at the outset is driven by a seemingly hubristic ambition: to be the first man (or white man at any rate) to traverse the length of the Congo River since the Victorian explorer Henry Morton Stanley's 1876-77 expedition, which sounds like the sort of thing only a egomaniac with a death wish would undertake. But Butcher is a sober character who carefully assessed and measured the risks beforehand. He could not ultimately have accomplished his feat without the assistance of Congolese on the ground and he accords them the credit due. The snide uttered by one reviewer that the author used dollars the way Stanley used brute force to secure compliance from the locals is ridiculous. Apart from the fact that the author never carried any weapons during the trip, the remark omits to mention that his motorcycle drivers who assisted the author with the first leg refused payment, out of professional pride. Otherwise he did what all journalists do if they want to get close to the ground, using local guides and fixers, entirely legitimate means to go about their trade. There is nothing amiss about that.

By Butcher's own admission, this was an example of ordeal rather than adventure travel but the details of the hardship he experienced are not overdone. They offer you a vivid sense of what it was actually like to do the trip. We don't just get a lucid impression of the hardships of the journey but also the land in which he travels and of the people he meets there. The DRC is the heart of Africa and the Congo River is at the heart of the DRC. And what the river could do for the DRC - stimulating trade commerce and wealth creation - the rest of the DRC could likewise do for Africa. The DRC however is not the beating heart of Africa because the river is the DRC's lifeless heart. This is more than just figurative. Much of the fauna along the river's route has been killed and eaten by desperate locals. There is an eerie silence along the many tracks and paths near the river on which humans travel.

What the author discovers along his travels on the river is the baleful legacy of decades of colonialism, followed by the misrule of corrupt, violent and rapacious local elites since independence in 1960, with the interference of outsiders thrown in for good measure. The author writes, on discovering a railway track that has almost been engulfed by the jungle, that he realised that he was travelling in a country with more of a past than a future, `a place where the hands of the clock spin not forwards, but backwards' (p. 249). The DRC is in free fall to year zero.

There is no light pollution among the Congolese villages. No coke cans or plastic bags litter the banks of the Congo's shore. But this is no idyll. Life is not just hard but hellish. It is hellish not because of the lack of basic facilities but the absence of a proper functioning state. This is what anarchy looks like. Not so much the war of all against all but the war of the strong against the weak, a one-sided conflict if there ever was one. The DRC is for all intents and purposes a country in name only. It is an arena for various warlords and strongmen and their armed retinues to kill, rob and loot. Not only are the people of Congo helpless before their own predatory compatriots, they are also helpless to withstand the assaults of neighboring countries. Until the underlying problems of a lack of accountability and the rule of law are resolved, no amount of money can solve the country's problems. This does not mean that the human spirit is extinguished in the DRC. He salutes the numerous examples of people he meets who have to undertake extraordinary feats just to survive. But they cannot thrive in such circumstances. Those in rich countries who gripe about government ought to read this book and see what the alternative looks like.

But why have such institutions failed to take root? Colonialism cannot be the full answer. It is true that Congo suffered particularly badly from an especially rapacious form of colonial asset stripping in the first decades of Belgian rule. Perhaps 3 million died in conditions of slave labour during the time the then Congo was the personal property of King Leopold. But Asian nations such as South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, India, Malaysia and Vietnam have managed to thrive or at least progress in the decades since throwing off colonial rule. But Africa by and large has regressed.

This is a disturbing truth for which there is no easy answer - it is in part the essence of the mystery that is the dark heart of the continent. Butcher offers no easy answers either but this book, combining travelogue with political and social analysis, is to be commended for bringing the reality of tens of millions of Congolese to the attention of a broad readership, a reality that we in the West, at least in part, have helped to create.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.