Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars The Circus (1928) blu-ray review
After being mistaken for a pickpocket & chased by the Police, Chaplin's tramp is offered a job in a circus where his clumsiness proves popular with audiences. Made in 1928 "The Circus" makes it's blu-ray debut courtesy of Park Circus for the UK running at 69 mins & is region B (locked) so will not be playable on US blu-ray players. This is a blu-ray/DVD set which includes...
Published on 25 Jun 2011 by AV1

versus
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Very poor quality
very poor quality picture, more like the quality of pirate copies , despite using on reasonable equipment, which reproduced other vhs well
Published 15 months ago by Bernie


Most Helpful First | Newest First

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars The Circus (1928) blu-ray review, 25 Jun 2011
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Circus - Dual Format Edition [Blu-ray + DVD] [1928] (Blu-ray)
After being mistaken for a pickpocket & chased by the Police, Chaplin's tramp is offered a job in a circus where his clumsiness proves popular with audiences. Made in 1928 "The Circus" makes it's blu-ray debut courtesy of Park Circus for the UK running at 69 mins & is region B (locked) so will not be playable on US blu-ray players. This is a blu-ray/DVD set which includes the film on both discs.

Obviously this silent comedy is not going to rival a 21st century blockbuster in terms of PQ but it actually holds up pretty well considering its age. There are occasional lines & pops but on the whole the image is fairly sharp in its original 4:3 ratio (black bars at the sides, remember widescreen never existed 80+ years ago!!).

Audio too is very clear, there's a mono track & HD track. As there is no dialogue in this film there is no need for subtitles, the film does have the English intertitles familiar with silent movies.

Extras are featured on the DVD version, they include an introduction, a documentary, outtakes & photo gallery.

The Circus is a decent & memorable film & whilst it's not Chaplin's best (that would be City Lights) it's definitely worth owning if you're a fan.

4/5.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars, 6 May 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Charlie Chaplin is wonderful, incredibly funny and poignant.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A formidable Greek maiden between two Norse gods, 30 Nov 2013
This review is from: The Circus - Dual Format Edition [Blu-ray + DVD] [1928] (Blu-ray)
Charlie Chaplin`s The Circus (1928) has long been considered something akin to Beethoven's 4th Symphony, which composer Robert Schumann referred to as "a Greek maiden between two Norse gods (the Eroica and the Fifth)." The Circus is the the maiden between two certifiable Chaplin masterpieces: The Gold Rush (1925) and City Lights (1931). Yet, Beethoven's Fourth, seen without Schumann's assessing lens, has, on occasion, proven to be a maiden unleashed, as in Carlos Kleiber's live, mercurial Munich version (on DVD) and Herbert Von Karajan's devastatingly sensuous 1963 performance with the BPO.

Like Beethoven's 4th, The Circus is an underrated opus. Seen without the preconceived assessment of historians, it is an interesting gem. Oddly, it is the one film of Chaplin's that was recognized for a "special" Academy Award. Despite that, it is an infrequently revived (and discussed) film.

The filmmaker himself did not help the cause for The Circus. Chaplin's autobiography is interesting primarily as a career autobiography. Private, painful details are omitted. Quite tellingly, Chaplin never once mentioned this film in that autobiography. Clearly, he avoided it because this film was made while he was going through a highly embarrassing divorce from one of his child brides (Lita Grey) at the time. Intimate details from Chaplin's sex life were exposed to the public. According to Kenneth Anger`s "Hollywood Babylon," Chaplin went through such an ordeal that during the divorce trial, the star's hair literally turned prematurely white.

Often, assessment of Chaplin's films include the biographical. A good example of this is Roger Ebert's review of The Circus. Ebert takes the often-traveled road of comparing Chaplin to Buster Keaton:

Chaplin was a considerable artist, brave and gifted, but I am in a minority in placing him second to Keaton among the silent clowns. My reasons for that are admittedly impulsive: I sense Keaton was the better man. Chaplin was so famous, so rich, so powerful when so young that there is a kind of conceit in the Tramp, a reverse noblesse oblige. Yes, he had a miserable childhood, and in his films, he often plays the friend of waifs, but there's an air of back-patting about it. The Buster Keaton character has his feet on the ground. He would be embarrassed to parade his goodness. He uses ingenuity rather than divinity. Chaplin's untidy love life suggests he felt he deserved whomever he wanted; Keaton in private life seems to have been melancholic because of alcoholism, but a decent enough sort with women.

The problem with Ebert's assessment of Chaplin is his objection to Chaplin's enormous success and his bullet point details of Chaplin's post-stardom biography. This view reduces Chaplin's films to the anecdotal. While remnants of personal history cannot be completely excluded in approaching Chaplin's art, his films, inevitably, transcend biography.

To be fair, Ebert is certainly correct in his comparison of the contrasting silent clown screen personas; Keaton's Stone Face never asked for audience sympathy in the obvious way that Chaplin's Tramp did. However, nor can Keaton identify with the everyman on Chaplin's level. The Tramp's poverty, which has nothing to do with the success of the actor playing the character, imbues him with an intimate personality that Keaton lacked. Out of all Chaplin's contemporaries, only Harry Langdon emerged with a comparable persona.

Ebert also makes a comparative notation regarding the amorous nature of the two clowns. To me, both Chaplin and Keaton are sexless, at least when filtered through a contemporary perspective. Chaplin's celibacy is that of the adolescent, as a people's priest. Keaton's character, while more intelligent and ambitious, is too phlegmatic for us to imagine him as anything other than chaste.

That Keaton was the more original filmmaker cannot be denied. His sense of aesthetic exploration is a model for early cinema. However, Chaplin proved more cunning in his business dealings. He never lost control of his films the way Keaton naively did. (Before he fatally lost artistic control to MGM, Keaton etched a celluloid character who embodied an admirable sense of detachment without resorting to overt populism).

The Circus finds Chaplin closest to Keaton territory, both in it's organic, innovative composition and its existential arc. The Circus emerges as a flawed, unique work of art, with the bleakest ending of all Chaplin's features. Desperation, contrasting with carnivalesque tinsel, evolves from the world of music hall pantomime and Max Linder, echoes Picasso's canvases of harlequins, and prefigures Fellini.

The Circus iris-ins on Merna (Merna Kennedy), riding bareback, bursting through a large star. Her ringmaster father (Al Garcia) becomes enraged when she misses the hoop on a second attempt. This misstep elicits a thrashing and period of starvation. Merna's act is followed by an ensemble of flabby, geriatric clowns. Al desperately needs a saving act.

Enter the Tramp, in an elaborate, virtuoso introduction. Starving, the Tramp is not above stealing food from a baby before he becomes the unwitting victim and pawn of a pickpocket. Wrongly accused, the Tramp runs for his life. He surrealistically mimics an animatronic prop in an amusement ride. Once discovered, he evades capture within a hall of mirrors (this scene surely influenced Orson Welles' Lady From Shanghai). This delightfully elongated vignette takes Charlie to the circus stage where he unknowingly becomes the hit of the show. The film's one conceit, which Chaplin could not resist, is in the audience crowning him as "the Funny Guy."

The Tramp is offered a job, as a prop man. The key to the Tramp's comic success is that his act is unintentional. Al shrewdly keeps his new employee in the dark, which, for awhile, isn't that hard to do. Charlie is the classic hobo, cooking his meager meal over an open fire, and sharing it with Merna, whom he is secretly in love with.

Naturally, several slapstick vignettes are in order. These involve the animal kingdom inhabitants of the circus. A jackass, a lion, a tiger, and monkeys on a high wire plague Charlie. While some of these bits are elaborately staged, none equal the freshness of the opening.

The Tramp discovers that he is the hit act, yet somehow this discovery does not dispel the performer's magic. However, the object of his affection is in love with trapeze artist Rex (Harry Crocker). The film ends with the Tramp exactly where he started. He accepts his fate without self-pity. Like us, he can understand his rejection, and the iris closes him off to us. Chaplin apparently hoped that iris would forever swallow up what he considered to be a best-forgotten opus. However, Chaplin cannot be trusted here as an objective judge or interpreter of his own work, which stands as a formidable maiden.

*my review originally appeared at 366 weird movies.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 4 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Very poor quality, 2 Sep 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
very poor quality picture, more like the quality of pirate copies , despite using on reasonable equipment, which reproduced other vhs well
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

The Circus - Dual Format Edition [Blu-ray + DVD] [1928]
£8.85
In stock
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Only search this product's reviews