Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop All Amazon Fashion Up to 70% off Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Shop Amazon Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

17
4.2 out of 5 stars
5 star
6
4 star
9
3 star
2
2 star
0
1 star
0
A Dandy in Aspic [DVD] [1968] [2007]
Format: DVDChange
Price:£3.77+£1.26shipping
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
on 8 January 2011
So much of the '60s spy genre is campy, and I love that, but this is an exception. If for no other reason to recommend this film, the art direction and cinematography is outstanding with well-considered shot after shot getting the most out of the impressive locations. The colour of the film jumped out at me too, not the expected '60s Eastman colours, but more of a Douglas Sirk '50s kind of style. But, there's more. Not wanting to give too much away, the lead character is a dislikable creation who only grows on you a little as the film progresses, but is fascinating to watch throughout; he reminded me of Jason King with all traces of campery banished. Mia Farrow is a complete delight every moment she appears on screen, and there's an impressive cast of actors you will recognise from, well, everything, popping up, most of them I didn't know by name but knew by sight. Peter Cook's performance is effectievly the comic relief, however he plays it the right side of funny to blend in with the general seriousness of the proceedings and gives his role depth when called for. Richard O'Sullivan (Man About the House) even appears in a small role as the (implied gay) best friend to Mia Farrow's character. Most enjoyable for anyone who appreciates '60s Spy cinema, and after watching this I even more so wish there was a way I could visit late '60s London and Berlin!
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 5 December 2009
Well, it is true I had high expectations of this movie, but I could never have believed to be this impressed. Anybody interested in watching a really good British spy thriller from the sixties should be recommended "A Dandy in Aspic" (1968) by Anthony Mann, starring Laurence Harvey, Tom Courtenay, Mia Farrow, Harry Andrews, Lionel Stander, and many others. When I read the plot synopsis in advance, I thought it would be too complicated to be watchable. I realized convoluted plots are inherent to the genre, but this seemed to be pushing it too far. Not so, or rather it does, but it is so well directed, with such a nice flow to the events that it just doesn't show. The sequence of events is so elegant and transparent that the understanding of the viewer is never hampered. And on the way, we get lovely views of London and West-Berlin. This time it is clear that no studio shots were used (which is also mentioned in the final credits). "A Dandy in Aspic" is British is the proper sense: it does have the agreeable sides (European sightseeing, men in bowler hats and umbrellas, posh British accents with matching insufferable attitudes), but lacks the drawbacks (no cheapish décor, no overtly hostile view of the Russians - after all, we are to sympathize with a double agent). Other positive elements: Mia Farrow as an adorable sixties style icon (though relevant to the story), cleverly constructed dialogue with lots of witty puns and repartee elements (innumerous examples), good use of music (cheerfully contemporary, but ominous whenever needed), the intro with the puppet on a string getting entangled in the end (great symbolism), the denouement and the final scene attached to it. The final shot is both graphically intriguing and insightful - it wraps everything up very smoothly, without the viewer being alerted in advance. I could easily elaborate on the plot, but it would spoil it at the same time. If I have understood the title correctly, even that deserves a compliment (= a secret agent is like a chic gentleman, living in elegant circumstances that do however feel oppressive from time to time - one can feel trapped like in luxury jelly, like one would in a golden cage - the main character is anxious to get out of it all, even before he becomes a potential suspect). This movie is a great achievement and a credit to British cinematic history.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
20 of 22 people found the following review helpful
on 12 March 2007
A rarely seen film from the Sixties, when every other film was about spies, A Dandy In Aspic gets a surprising though not undeserved DVD release, looking very good but totally devoid of extras.

As an espionage caper, this one falls somewhere in between the fantasy world of Ian Fleming and the gritty reality of John Le Carre. The central character is a Russian double agent and occasional assassin who has had enough and wants to go home - just as British Intelligence seem to be on the brink of uncovering him. Of course, the Russians don't really want him back - he's too valuable where he is. At least, so they keep saying. But it's hard to see why. He seems rather amateurish and everyone appears to suspect him. Still, the thing about Sixties spy movies is that they didn't necessarily have to make sense, and this one seldom does. But it has a nice style and some interesting performances from an eclectic cast.

In the lead role, Laurence Harvey draws on his Baltic background to conviningly show both sides of his two-faced character - English dandy and Russian agent. A very under-rated actor, he holds the film together with his cool underplaying and world-weary expressions. Tom Courtenay plays a ruthless British agent in much the same way as he played Strelnikov in Dr Zhivago a few years earlier. Swedish actor Per Oscarson drops by for a nicely realised cameo and dependable character actors such as Harry Andrews and John Bird put in their usual solid performances. The one member of the cast who seems to be genuinely enjoying himself is Lionel Stander who easily steals every scene he's in as a Russian spy chief with a twisted sense of humour. To provide the obligatory love interest, Mia Farrow plays an English photographer who doesn't know how to hold a camera let alone use one. She is as much set decoration as leading lady although she redeems herself with a couple of quite amusing throwaway lines (she couldn't be a model, she says, because she's "too voluptuous").

The film is set and filmed in London and Berlin and it's certainly interesting to see Berlin as it was during the cold war. But the only hint we get of Swinging London is in the Twiggy-esque outfits worn by Miss Farrow and in the rather bizarre appearance and performance of Peter Cook as yet another British agent. The music by Quincy Jones also does little to set the scene but the camerawork is typically Sixties style, if a tad uneven.

The story seldom makes sense. For example, the Russians keep saying how valuable Laurence Harvey is to them. But, after 18 years, he doesn't seem to have advanced very far in British Intelligence. And why would the Russians risk him by having him carry out assassinations instead of bringing in a professional hitman? Nothing is really answered and the film finishes with a typical Sixties ending. All in all, it's rather stylish but don't think about it too much. It's intertesting to see A Dandy In Aspic again after all these years. We can only hope that more such seldom-seen films will soon be released on DVD to satisfy the cravings of dedicated film fans.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 20 September 2013
This is a stunning film - taut and strange and mesmeric - Harvey never better. Slight falling off towards end (perhaps - only perhaps) as Harvey took over direction from the dead director, but the London scenes are a shock of Abstract Expressionism. I just wasn't expecting this degree of high control. Oblique touches of comedy add to the eerie geometry. Then there's the layered psychology of multiple identity with a distressing algebra all its own. British films are rarely this ruthless - was Antonioni moonlighting?
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 6 March 2013
This film captures the claustrophobia of the era and the cold war. It's a good film, with varied locations, and a number of unexpected actors popping up here and there. Lawrence Harvey was a very good actor, and his death at an early age robbed us of a massive talent. Read the entries elsewhere on the making of the film, I am not sufficiently skilled as a critic or commentator to give all the details, but this film is well paced, the story is engaging, and it's well worth watching.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 27 February 2013
I saw this one back in the day. It is a good example of the genre of UK thrillers of the era. One could be high-browed and and talk about the nuances of the storyline and the excellent use of the location shots but really all one needs to say is that this gem keeps one guessing to the end. The story progresses at a nice pace, niether dragging nor mired in unwanted detail. All in all, a good spy thriller that doesn't rely on gimmicks.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 1 October 2009
There's intensity, there's suspens, a very gripping story beautifully filmed. Probably, a film cannot be bad if there's Laurence Harvey in it .
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
I confess. I needed to check Aspic in the dic., and I still don't really get the title. Anyway - what a pleasant surprise awaited my wife and I as we sat down with our lovely bottle of Merlot. If I have ever seen this before it would have been on it's cinema release in '68, and I don't think ever since. Where has it been? There are an awful lot of good (and not so good) films that for various (copyright?) reasons have just vanished, and it's really nice to see this one appear on a really good Scope transfer with excellent colour and sound. The locations (and most of it is location) are filmed well and are very interesting. The plot is relatively straightforward, for a spy thriller, and we followed it easily, even if it doesn't always make sense, but what spy film in the 60's always did? As for the acting...well, I'm tempted to say it is completely miscast from star to support, and maybe it is, but...I still enjoyed it. Harvey is just Harvey (as other reviewers say - when was he ever "likeable") but you do need to at least have some sympathy for his character, and I didn't. Mia Farrow is totally out of place, but if you fancy her, you won't be disapointed. Tom Courteney surprises with his perf., sadly someone else has pre emted me by referring to his "Zhivago" perf! Bird and Cook are awful. Stander is good, Harry Andrews raises his powerful voice, and Barbara Murray goes to bed with Harvey. (The things an actress has to do!). I don't know how much of this helps a prospective viewer, but I would definitely go for this. Relax, enjoy, and don't analyse it too much. I promise you, you will have seen much much worse.
33 commentsWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
TOP 1000 REVIEWERon 12 February 2010
I wasn't expecting much from this film. I acquired it hard on the heels of reading a biography of Peter Cook which made mention of it. My others reasons for purchase 1] Big Lawrence Harvey afficionado 2] Never seen it before despite a great interest in 60s/70s cinema.
I was pleasantly surprised. I did think it could have been a better whole but parts of it - including the conceit and introspection of the key protagonist, a double agent played by Harvey - seemed near contemporary in theme. You sense Harvey's character - Eberlin/Krasnevin - is doomed from the start, a characterisation not helped by his half-hearted dalliance through the course of the film with an exasperating Mia Farrow, thrown a bum role if ever there was one, as a pretty but shallow token of Swinging London. Still Harvey manages to preserve the integrity of his character. To me, his acting is spare, naturalistic and very modern. Deeply underrated in his day, I reckon Harvey outperforms Tom Courteney, widely regarded as the better actor, in this vehicle because it suits him so well. Of East European extraction himself, the duality of the film's central character mirrors Harvey's own duality to spasmodic powerful effect.
This is by no means a 'great' movie. But it is as close as you may get to revealing flashes of Harvey's true potential in a role far removed from variations on a theme of 'matinee idol'. If you enjoy Cold War espionage thrillers, spotting 60s character actors or just a film that 'looks good', worth dipping your toe in 'Aspic'.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
on 16 December 2008
Other reviews highlight the minor shortcomings of this film,which are the main characters implausible role,and the resultant lack of real tension created. The mood falls between sixties stylishness and cold war grittiness,without ever convincing in either.
None of the characters are sympathetic (when has Harvey ever been likeable?),and more use could have been made of Tom Courtenay's excellent performance and his battle with Harvey.
Nevertheless,the film has an interesting premise for a plot,although the twists are underdeveloped,and it is wonderfully and stylishly photographed in crisp colour. The location shots,particularly of Berlin, are very atmospheric,and the sequence at AVUS is fascinating.
For spy-film fans,it is an extremely interesting example of the genre,and for lovers of Berlin it is especially rewarding.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
     
 
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The Deadly Affair [1966] [DVD] [2006]
The Deadly Affair [1966] [DVD] [2006] by James Mason (DVD - 2006)
£4.10

Ring of Spies [DVD]
Ring of Spies [DVD] by Bernard Lee (DVD - 2014)
£4.99

The Quiller Memorandum [1966] [DVD]
The Quiller Memorandum [1966] [DVD] by Senta Berger (DVD - 2006)
£6.00
 
     

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.