Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop All Amazon Fashion Summer Savings Up to 25% Off Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Oasis Learn more Shop now Learn more

Customer Reviews

4.9 out of 5 stars15
4.9 out of 5 stars
5 star
13
4 star
2
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 15 September 2013
If I'm honest, I'm not a great fan of Debussy, but La Mer is beatifully done. Mussorgsky/Ravel Pictures at an Exhibition is just stunning and Ravel's Bolero is majestic.

Too many music recordings these days take the tempo far too fast (submitting to commercial pressure to get as much down as possible on a CD), so the whole thing gets blurred. If orchestral pieces are played too fast, then individual sections of the orchestra cannot keep it together and the rest of the orchestra rapidly loses the plot as well. As a result, a listener's brain rapidly tires of trying to resolve the timing issues. Not so with this recording, clearly, as it was done in the heady days of "vinyl". I'm not going to get into a discussion of whether vinyl is better than CD, but it's simply a matter of the amount of music you could get onto two sides of an LP compared with the extra 15 minutes or so you can get onto a CD - there's a strong temptation to add another piece that won't quite fit unless you rush everything, but at least you can appeal to a wider audience when putting together a medley and you also save on production costs (fewer CDs in a boxed set, for example). Each note on this recording is audible and the perfomance is tight, without being wooden, a result of (a) von Karajan's firm direction and (b) not taking things too fast, so the orchestra members could LISTEN to each other and stay together as the tempo was accelerated and decelerated for dramatic effect.

As an example of what I'm talking about with tempo... Maurice Ravel originally wrote 76 bpm on his score for Bolero. Later, he crossed that out and wrote 66 bpm instead. His first recording in 1930 lasted 15 min 50 sec. At 76 bpm, the piece lasts a little under 14 min and the majority of modern recordings are in this ball-park. The majority of "old" recordings are nearer the 15:30 - 16:00 mark (although Stokovsky holds the speed record with his 1940 recording in about 12 min). Toscanini annoyed Ravel intensely with his 1930 recording at 13:25 and the two did not speak for some months afterwards.

This album also, thankfully, lacks that bane of modern recordings... over-compression... which means that you get the full dynamic range of the pieces, with none of the drop-outs in volume every time someone in the percussion section crashes his cymbals, for example. Compression is used far too much in modern recordings (and, sadly, in so-called "digitally re-mastered" older recordings as well). Again, this is due to commercial pressures to maximise bandwidth usage, but there's really no need for it - it's just lazy. And frustrating to listen to.

Taking the tempo far too fast and/or compressing the bejayzus out of it is an insult not only to the composer but also to the ears.

</rant>

Anyroadup, this is a fantastic recording of some sublime music, played beautifully by a top-flight orchestra, conducted by one of the great masters of his art and it hasn't been messed with by one of the jeune ecole of sound engineers. Get it.
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
TOP 50 REVIEWERon 13 October 2014
Apart from a couple of reviews from way back around the turn of the century, whose authors hear flaws in this recording that I do not, nearly everyone concurs that ever since their recording fifty years ago, these performances have remained unequalled and unassailable. Of course there are are other excellent recordings of all three pieces (Giulini's "Pictures" with the Chicago SO and his "La mer" with the Philharmonia, for example) but as a collection this is a testament to both the sonority of the Berlin Philharmonic at its peak under Karajan and to that conductor's chameleon ability to empathise with and elucidate music from outside the late German Romantic tradition in which he excelled. His brief dalliance with the Orchestre de Paris confirms his attachment to French music and his ability to pace and colour both the Debussy and the Ravel emerges as a thing of wonder.

There is of course a neat link in the programming here between the Mussorgsky and "Boléro" as the composer of the latter orchestrated the "Pictures" brilliantly; originally these recordings, made between 1964 and 1966 in the warm ambiance of the Jesus-Christus-Kirche, were issued on two separate LPs, one of French music by Debussy and Ravel and the other with just the Mussorgsky and "Boléro". Any attempt at musical criticism of such seminal recordings would be superfluous after such a long time; it is sufficient to note that the delicacy and nuance of Karajan's evocation of the sea remain extraordinary, and the peroration of the "Pictures" in "The Great Gate of Kiev" remains one of the greatest expositions of the symphony orchestra in full flight ever committed to disc.
88 comments|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 July 2014
Listen to it loud and somewhat inebriated and you'll be skating around your home in your stocking soles, knocking nicknacks asunder by the time Boléro reaches its pinnacle. Wonderful.
0Comment|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 15 July 2013
Probably their three best known works. It's taken quite a while to become used to Debussy's music which has been likened to Impressionist art in music. I am gradually beginning to appreciate him more with the help of this CD. The Ravel Bolero is so well known that it requires no comment other than to say that is wonderfully hypnotic. The Mussorgsky work is a series of little vignettes that may be enjoyed en masse or individually.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 April 2016
ITEM ARRIVED IN GOOD TIME AND AS DESCRIBED. BY FAR THE BEST RENDITION OF BOLERO I HAVE HEARD AS WAS MUSSORGSKY. THE DEBUSSY WAS A FIRST TIME BONUS FOR ME.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 April 2010
brilliant recording and a good pairing of composers bought this to replace a record and its blow me away by far the best recording of this i have heard
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 February 2016
A lovely CD that I really enjoy, prompt delivery and well packaged
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 April 2016
Superb 'pictures' - a top recommendation
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 May 2015
Torvill and Dean only better
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 March 2010
I originall purchased this albumn on vinyl then as a cassette tape and now as a CD. I purchesed the albumn for the performance of Bolero.

Recorded before Torvill & Dean turned this great composition into a 3 minute pop instrumental this version has the tension, power and emotion to bring tears to my eyes.

It is a full 16 minutes of superb instrumentation and arrangement and leaves one feeling uplifted.
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)