Customer Reviews


8 Reviews
5 star:
 (5)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars It Rocks!
The cover puff for this book claims that it is 'intended for browsing and arguments - but also as a highly practical guide to rock music' And for once, this is a very accurate description of this 1000 plus page work. The Rough Guide to Rock is excellent on two levels; both as a guide to bands and their discographies, but also as a general repository of trivia which...
Published on 8 Nov 1999

versus
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars I'm Not Convinced That Less Is More
I'm really somewhat disappointed by the editorial direction that this third edition of the 'Rough Guide to Rock' has taken, though arguably, in this shift, it has actually moved closer to its remit than that pursued by previous editions. For this edition, the editor has narrowed the definition of 'rock' considerably, which has meant the jettisoning of many of the bands...
Published on 13 Jan 2004 by Pen Name


Most Helpful First | Newest First

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars It Rocks!, 8 Nov 1999
By A Customer
The cover puff for this book claims that it is 'intended for browsing and arguments - but also as a highly practical guide to rock music' And for once, this is a very accurate description of this 1000 plus page work. The Rough Guide to Rock is excellent on two levels; both as a guide to bands and their discographies, but also as a general repository of trivia which bears many hours of dipping in and out. Whether you open the Guide to find a specific piece of information, simply fancy a casual browse, or are trying to settle some esoteric dispute about some long-forgotten band or song, the chances are you will start off by looking up one entry, then find yourself drawn by cross references to other entries, which in turn will lead to further browsing until, by the time you have put the Guide down, you find you have revisited a substantial portion of your musical history.
Those of us who should get out more are inevitably drawn into an exercise of trying to find bands that have been omitted; ultimately a fairly unrewarding exercise, so comprehensive is the Guide. In any case, such efforts usually end fairly abruptly as the eye is drawn to yet another entry you want to read up on.
The Rough Guide to Rock is written by fans, and it is the enthusiasm of the fans which makes this such a rewarding book. Inevitably the entries are a bit uneven in terms of length and detail, but the editors have done an excellent job of achieving a good degree of consistency overall. The entries are grouped alphabetically by band rather than chronologically or by record, which makes the Guide very easy to navigate around, and it should be commended to anyone who has ever had an interest in rock and pop music which went beyond a vague awareness of who was top of the charts.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Buy it where you see it!, 16 Jan 2009
By 
Jim O'Donoghue (UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
The third and, presumably, final edition of The Rough Guide to Rock is already a little dated. But then why would you need another description of Duffy's album or Amy Winehouse's hairdo? The Guide is an excellent place to stumble across records that have been forgotten or were always obscure. I had never realised that David McComb made a solo album, for example - and who or what were Danielle Dax or Eg and Alice? When you look these things up you find an entry written by a fan, someone who has not just done his research by forcing himself to listen to all the albums of Judas Priest while doing the washing up but genuinely loves Judas Priest and wants you to love them, too! That said, he will still tell you honestly when he thinks Judas Priest underachieved. There are times, of course, when you find yourself disagreeing violently with an opinion. Can anyone really think that Springsteen's The River is full of 'weak ballads'? But because it is written by people who have some personal involvement in the material and not by some weary and embittered old hack, the tone of this Guide never descends to that of the dreadful Time Out film guides, for example, with all their supercilious snarliness.

The Guide gives no indepth study of punk or heavy metal, of course - that is why it has been discontinued in favour of the individual genre guides. But for someone who listens to music without thinking too much of genre boundaries, who is as likely to put on a Stevie Wonder lp as something by the Go-Betweens, this is a great book to have in your shelves. Keep scanning the thrift shops!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars I'm Not Convinced That Less Is More, 13 Jan 2004
I'm really somewhat disappointed by the editorial direction that this third edition of the 'Rough Guide to Rock' has taken, though arguably, in this shift, it has actually moved closer to its remit than that pursued by previous editions. For this edition, the editor has narrowed the definition of 'rock' considerably, which has meant the jettisoning of many of the bands and artists who were included in previous editions, but who were really only 'rock' in the sense that 'rock' is sometimes used to denote 'popular music' as opposed to a guitar-based stream of music within popular music. This shift makes this third edition perhaps more authentic to its title, but also means that it is a much more one-dimensional read. I used to happily browse previous editions of the 'Rough Guide to Rock', intrigued by what leafing through those pages offered. Now, because of its lack of diversity, I fear I'll be using this edition in a rather dry fashion simply as a reference book to answer enquiries.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Marvellous though inconsistent tome., 20 Jan 2000
By 
Peter Fenelon - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Rough Guide to Rock (Paperback)
A comprehensive encyclopedia of rock that, despite being written by fans, is literate, amusing and generally tasteful. Takes the core Rough Guides values of involvement and honesty and applies them to the rock world, so isn't afraid to admit when artists made awful albums, or tried ludicrous projects. Covers over 1000 bands in about as many pages, so is far from being the last word on any of them (most entries are about half a page, with some more significant acts getting up to 2 or 3 pages). No full discographies -- the recommendations cherrypick carefully and are usually pretty much spot on.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Adequate but lacking in informed detail in some places, 30 Jun 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
I bought this on the strength of some reviews. I have been buying and listening to rock music since I bought my 1st record Not Fade Away by The Rolling Stones and I have an LP collection spanning that year until now, though the bulk is from the 60's & 70's. This book lacks detail on several levels.It's as if the contributors do not have an in - depth knowledge.
There is no mention, for example, of Manfred Mann who were as significant as The Small Faces, who are included. Thus, no mention either of Manfred Man Chapter Three, who made 2 important jazz - rock LPs. The T. T.Rex/Marc Bolan does not recommend any of the Tyrannosaurus Rex LPs despite the fact that both Beard Of Stars and Unicorn are classic LPs of their era.
Jerry Gracia of The Grateful Dead is mentioned but no mention of Bob Weir's solo
work - his 1st LP is better than anything Garcia produced as was his 1st LP with
Kingfish. The same is true of Jack Bruce from Cream (his Songs For A Tailor LP is better than almost all of Clapton's output) and Ginger Baker who was important in promoting African music and made one decent LP with Airforce.Likewise Dennis Wilson's Pacific Ocean Blue is not properly acknowledged (The Beach Boys). Many significant "underground" bands from the UK late 60s/early 70s period are ignored at the expense of decidely "iffy" US bands who made one half good LP then disappeared. No Spooky Tooth/Third Ear Band/Quintessence/Principal Edwards Magic Theatre/Comus/Titus Groan/Touch/Gracious/Audience references who all made better music than a significant number of the acts mentioned. Some significant sole artists are omitted who came under the rock umbrella such as Mike Cooper. One can only assume many of the people who emailed in have not even heard of them ?
Patch is the adjective I would use. There are better books of this type such as the 1001 Albums You Must Hear.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars As good as the Rough Guide to Jazz, 29 Jan 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Very very useful as a research resource. Well-written and -researched. Needs updating (a re-edition) and makes what some would say are surprising omissions (though these are explained to some extent in the Intro). But still a very good buy if you take it on its own terms.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Why did they stop producing it? Good up to ca 2003, 3 Nov 2011
By 
Doccox "ian_cox9" (UK) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)   
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
I have been a fan of the Rough music guides ever since I used the Rough Guide to Opera as a basis for selecting key performance CD's.
NOTE This item was discontinued in 2003 and , as with any rare item , now commands high prices for new or even used versions.
Whilst I usually buy books new , given the cut off date of 2003 , I got my copy as an ex library book through Amazon - condition acceptable .
My objective was to compare it with the All Music Guide to Rock 3rd Edition - 2000 - there is a 2003 edition I believe) - see my earlier review of this 3rd Edition .

The key negatives of the AMG review were that any band / group that did not make it significantly in the US eg Van Der Graaf Generator didn't get a full mention AND most of the CD's suggested / rated 1 - 5 stars were the US track lists - not surprising but worth being aware of if using as a basis for seeking out key examples of a particular band / music style

The Rough Guide is more UK/Europe orientated although covers key US bands and singers pretty well. The singer / band histories appear to be accurate and allow one to trace developments as band members shifted between different groups or became solo artists

The recommended CD's no vinyl mentioned obviously predate 2003 so a lot of the recent (2004 - 2009) digital remasters are not covered .
Whilst several CD's are suggested they are a fairly personal selection and have no star ratings too personal??).This contrasts to the AMG selection where definitive CD's are starred and highlighted
One could easily get into major "discussions" as to the Rough Guide reviewers recommended selections although , in the history section most of the bands output / albums are critically discussed .As in any book of this size there are selections and omissions. If you are looking specifically UK and one book only , this might be one to choose.

If you can get a good quality / reasonable price version, it is worth getting it to compare with the AMG "definitive" guide .

Any suggestions as to what new tome now covers the market - or is Rock new developments) dead? Or is there just a lack of a decent summary?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 5 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Anglo-centric and myopic, devoid of any mention of Robbie Clark, 1 Jun 2009
By 
Crazyfingers (Music City, USA) - See all my reviews
While full of bands and some great history, the emphasis is definitely on British Invasion and a penchant for witty photo captions in a style borrowed from The Economist.

Glaring American band omissions, like the Robbie Clark Trio and Billy Joel (?)(!) clearly efface any objectivity when it comes to Rock's country of origin.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

The Rough Guide to Rock
The Rough Guide to Rock by Mark Ellingham (Paperback - 4 Nov 1999)
Used & New from: £0.01
Add to wishlist See buying options
Only search this product's reviews