Customer Reviews


33 Reviews
5 star:
 (15)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (9)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


85 of 121 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars These dogmatists, they don't like it up 'em!
This is a small book, printed on thick paper with big margins - which sounds like a criticism, but, since it makes its case succintly, stylishly and, for the most part, carefully, really functions as a dig at Richard Dawkins' big book, The God Delusion, which brims with ideas apparently cribbed from stage 1 philosophy notes - the implication being that a more careful and...
Published on 25 Sep 2007 by Olly Buxton

versus
79 of 111 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Darwin's Angel gives Dawkins a pasting?
I approached this book with some glee; it has generally had good reviews and I had high hopes of it. There have been several previous books, attempting serious criticisms of Richard Dawkins's highly popular (currently 51 weeks on the US `Bestseller list') The God Delusion. These earlier books disappointed me; they either failed to rebut Dawkins, they misrepresented him...
Published on 16 Sep 2007 by John Anderson


Most Helpful First | Newest First

18 of 45 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Angel Delight, 5 Sep 2007
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
This is a gem of a book and a must-read, especially for those God Delusion readers who love intelligent debate and who don't take themselves too seriously - as Dawkins perhaps - on the subject of religious belief or non-belief. The book's arguments are sharp, stimulating and sincere; in more ways than one this slim volume is less pompous and h-e-a-v-y than God Delusion: its lively and entertaining 168 pages could be enjoyed in a weekend or on the train, providing a fascinating range of ideas, history and points of order. The weakness of the foundations and structures of many of Dawkins' arguments are exposed by Cornwell in prose which for all its lightness of touch and elegance is none the less devastating, and whose conclusions are profound, accessible and readable.

Darwin's Angel is an important book - for believers and unbelievers alike: in providing us a defence of religious belief Cornwell does not set out to preach to the converted; neither does the author seek to convert wavering agnostics or the certainty of unbelievers. Instead Darwin's Angel will be enjoyed by readers in both camps who value intellectual honesty and the accommodation in society of a range of beliefs and non-beliefs. One of the criticisms thrown at Dawkins is the smug certainty accompanying his dismissal of all those blind enough not to join him and other atheists (ideally getting them to stand up to be counted); in an age where fundamentalist and absolutist views abound - both religious and atheist - Darwin's Angel's message of tolerance and humanity is a salutary one and the book succeeds in stirring further and improving the quality of this great debate.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


19 of 49 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Best response to Dawkins I have read, 10 Sep 2007
By 
Roger Steer (Devon, England) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
I thoroughly recommend John Cornwell's riposte to Dawkins' "The God Delusion" and have bought additional copies for my sons who, to my dismay as a Christian, are Dawkins fans. Although much of Cornwell's book is written in gentle tone as a contribution to the debate, he does at one point venture the cutting observation to Dawkins that "your book is as innocent of heavy scholarship as it is free of false modesty" adding that he has "no clear sense of you discriminating between history and theory, empirical evidence and intuition, statistical data and hunch".

Cornwell justly accuses Dawkins of being "dismissive of theology" and rightly reminds us that "theologians draw on an impressive range of academic disciplines - including history, philosophy, anthropology, literature and scriptural criticism - and they bring together dynamic intellectual capacities - of the imagination".

In suggesting that Dawkins is disturbed by the dimensions of imagination, Cornwell writes "It sounds as though you would substitute a set of case-notes on senile dementia for Shakespeare's King Lear; or a horticultural fact sheet for Wordsworth's `Daffodils'." What does the imagination do? It "enables human beings to contemplate and model their past and their future, their origins and their destiny, their meaning and their nature: to make choices; to think scientifically and religiously too. Scientific imagination is different from religious imagination - but both find connections in at least the capacity common to both to make metaphors". At the end of his early famous book "The Selfish Gene", Dawkins allowed that humans were able to rebel against and rise above the determinism of their genetic makeup to be creative and imaginative. But, says Cornwell, "you appear in this new book to have definitely retreated from a trust in the dynamic, protean power of imagination when it comes to religion." He asks: "Have you retreated because you no longer believe in the power of the imagination to impart literary, poetic, religious and moral truth either? Or because trust in the imagination threatens your militant atheism?"

In a well-put section on faith and the credibility of the Bible, Cornwell writes: "Although the Gospels are not history in the modern sense, they can be read in the reasonable confidence that Jesus Christ actually lived and walked the earth 2,000 years ago; that he chose followers, preached a striking message about love, told parables, and was crucified. Accepting that Christ was the Son of God, performed miracles, rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven certainly requires something more than routine credibility: it requires faith. But is this comparable to requiring that to `enjoy' Wuthering Heights, a reader must believe that its characters actually existed? Surely not. A willing suspension of belief such as one adopts when reading plays, novels and poetry is not at all the same as faith; and your insinuation that people are incapable of making such a distinction betrays a poor regard for the reading public."

Dawkins complains that theologians (in Cornwell's words) "pick and choose which bits of scripture to believe, which bits to write off as symbols or allegories". In response, Cornwell tells him: "Your impatience with the general untidiness of the Scriptures and the different way in which theologians, and indeed most believers, read them betrays your neglect of even minimal enquiry into the nature of scriptural scholarship. The collection of texts known as the Bible contains a variety of different literary forms, including homily, allegory, meditation, parable, chronicle, poetry, legend, folk memory, ironic aphorisms, prophecy, prayer... Scholars don't so much pick and choose which bits to believe and which bits they decide to write off: they read critically on many different levels, and from many points of view, and not with the reductive aim you have in mind. The task of reading scripture critically - a task that requires a formidable array of skills and disciplines - has gone on in every era." Cornwell rebukes Dawkins for paying scant attention to new insights in literary criticism which have deepened our understanding of biblical stories and in the process enhanced rather than diminished the Bible's credibility.

Cornwell takes Dawkins up on his use of the word "supernatural" which he uses constantly as applied to religion and God. Cornwell argues that the concept of supernatural was originally developed to describe behaviour that outstrips the natural capacities of any creature and quotes the Cambridge theologian, Nicholas Lash, who would tell his students: "If you were to come across a rabbit playing Mozart on the violin you could bet your bottom dollar you have witnessed a supernatural phenomenon, for rabbits don't have it in them to play the violin." So Cornwell suggests to Dawkins that the phenomenon he calls God is the one being who cannot act supernaturally, for how could God outperform His natural abilities?

I have said nothing about Cornwell's final two chapters headed "Does God Exist?" and "Being Religious". These are splendid examples of very fine writing and I urge you to buy a copy of the book so that you can read them for yourself.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


15 of 40 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars knowing what you talk about, 17 Sep 2007
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
John Cornwell has written a book on religion knowing what he talks about. That is not the case of many authors that, no matter whether they are in favour or against religion, have not really understood what the question is. This is also the case of Richard Dawkins and his book "The God Delusion". Cornwell tries to challenge Dawkins' arguments mainly by showing how little they have to do with a serious understanding of religious phenomena in mankind, how little research he has done and how little information he has collected about such a difficult matter.

Cornwell's book is clear, kind and humoristic, in addition to its dialectic efficiency. If Dawkins wants to make the (little) effort of understanding it, sure he will be happy and grateful to his opponent, because he will have learnt much more about the true importance of the subject than he would have never imagined.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 38 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars An honest response to positivist intolerance, 12 Sep 2007
By 
T. Aspray (UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
The critic always has the advantage over his subject: However, in his brief review, John Cornwell avoids focusing on easy targets such as Dawkins' pompous style and irritating self-reference, to which he has become increasingly prone over the years. Nor does he bleat paranoia about anti-religious bigotry.

Cornwell's précis of The God Delusion is excellent, including a summary of the God hypothesis and Dawkins' development of the theme. He complements this with ideas, which can evade positivist thinking (imagination, beauty, religion) and fills in some historical gaps on the origins of anti-religious thought, independent of science. I particularly liked this book when it touched on description of how it feels to be religious, avoiding use of all artificial sweeteners; while Cornwell is most raw, when we see his irritation at Dawkins' intolerance.

However, I am glad to come away from this book with a sense that reasoned debate can be balanced, if folks listen to each other. I see that Cornwell's acuity is good. I fear that Dawkins' intolerance prevents his engagement, which is a shame as, if nothing else, he might learn something about pruning text and avoiding unnecessary offence. Overall an excellent read!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 39 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A divine read.., 16 Sep 2007
By 
Amanda (London, England) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
Beautifully written, gently wise and laugh-out-loud funny in parts, Darwin's Angel is a wonderful and heavenly voice which invites our deepest thoughts to take flight as John Cornwell questions the basis of some of Richard Dawkins' most radical and dangerous arguments about religion. A truly inspired book and divine read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 39 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Wit, Truth and Imagination, 11 Sep 2007
By 
N. Beale (London, England) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
This is a superb debunking of "The brilliant popular expositor of zoology, Professor Richard Dawkins, whom I endeavour to take as seriously as he does himself", done with wit, truth and imagination. Not for nothing is the author director of the Science and the Human Dimension project at Camrbidge - poor Dawkins misses the Human Dimension completely - nor does he understand that the greatest living scientists appreciate (eg Marin Rees, Stephen Hawking) that there can never be a scientific Theory of Everything. Read, enjoy and open your minds. And laugh at the arrogant pretentiousness that it gently but firmly puts in its place.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 37 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars forensic logic, 10 Sep 2007
By 
Vicky (London, UK) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
Darwin's Angel will have intelligent believing Christians breathing a sigh of relief - Cornwell calmly and very elegantly douses Dawkins' angry tirade against religion with a precisely targeted jet of forensic logic. For such an erudite riposte, it's also readable and even amusing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 14 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars well crafted, but no answers, 5 Mar 2008
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
Cornwell's style is disarming, and he succeeds in taking the moral high ground, if only in tone. He rightly pokes fun at Dawkins's self-referencing, and takes him to task effectively over some of his more hysterical or baseless claims. But be careful what you wish for... I read this on an atheists quest to find faith - even reasonable doubt. And here this book is crushingly disappointing; indeed, towards the end it appeared to me to dismantle and trivialise religion as effectively as Dawkins himself. This book would frustrate Dawkins I imagine, as Cornwell often misses the point; it may even embarrass him a little with its deliberate style and composure. That said, I still see Dawkins closing the book with a wry smile... And I remain an atheist with little more food for thought.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


15 of 44 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars religious imagination, 5 Sep 2007
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
Cornwell's angel is an image for the imagination shared by art, science and religion; this extraordinary book makes crucial connections between all those human efforts to understand our origins, and destiny, through the different discourses of the mind and the heart set free from the constrains of time and space. Dawkins book is a denial of imagination, whereas Cornwell confirms its essential capacity in seeking transcendence. This is an elegant, beautifully reasoned, and eloquent book that confirms the dignity of human identity.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 46 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars the perfect Christmas present, 10 Sep 2007
This review is from: Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" (Hardcover)
I read this gem of a book in one sitting. John Cornwell's sentences flow like few others' making this serious but lively read a real page-turner. He lets Dawkins get away with nothing. Yet Darwin's Angel stands on its own, too, and could be enjoyed whether or not you have ploughed your way through The God Delusion. Stuck for a Christmas present? Give this and you won't go wrong.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion"
Darwin's Angel: An Angelic Riposte to "The God Delusion" by John Cornwell (Hardcover - 6 Sep 2007)
Used & New from: 0.01
Add to wishlist See buying options
Only search this product's reviews